Desth Of A Naturalist (Seamus Heaney) Flashcards

1
Q

“All year the flax-dam festered in the heart / Of the townland;”

A

verb “festered” = semantic field of disease, corruption

• plosive “f” sounds = harsh, violent tone → nature = repulsive

• irony in “heart” = centrality of decay not life

• juxtaposition of setting + verb = tension between natural + unnatural

Heaney opens with an anti-idyllic portrayal of rural life, foreshadowing the loss of innocence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bubbles gargled delicately”

A

oxymoron = contrasts harsh “gargled” w/ gentle “delicately” → sensory confusion

• onomatopoeia “gargled” = physical immersion, fascination

• lexical tension = beauty misread in violence

• innocence = speaker finds charm in repulsion

Heaney explores the blurred boundary between attraction and disgust in the child’s naive perception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Miss Walls would tell us how / The daddy frog was called a bullfrog”

A

reported speech = adult knowledge = authority figure

• “daddy” / “bullfrog” = masculine imagery → latent aggression

• enjambment = mimics child’s excitement + recall

• foreshadowing = innocence undercut by coded violence

Heaney shows how facts from adults are filtered through a child’s lens, charged with hidden tension.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

And how he croaked and how the mammy frog / Laid hundreds of little eggs”

A

repetition “how…how” = breathless tone, childlike fascination

• simplistic diction “mammy” = emotional closeness, youth

• natural fertility seen as magical → not yet understood

• list-like structure = awe-driven accumulation

Heaney captures the childhood wonder of nature’s reproductive power before knowledge brings fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

“Then one hot day when fields were rank”

A

temporal shift “then” = pivotal tonal change

• “rank” = double meaning: lush/overgrown + disgusting → symbolic rot

• sensory saturation = overwhelming tension rising

• shift from curiosity → confrontation

Heaney marks the irreversible loss of innocence with this tonal and sensory shift into disgust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“Angry frogs invaded the flax-dam;”

A

anthropomorphism = “angry” → frogs become threatening

• military verb “invaded” = semantic field of war, violence

• contrast to passive frogs before = new perception

• power dynamic reversed → speaker now the victim

Heaney recasts nature as aggressive and hostile, mirroring the speaker’s emotional disturbance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Gross-bellied frogs were cocked / On sods;”

A

grotesque compound “gross-bellied” = repulsive, bodily horror

• violent metaphor “cocked” = loaded gun → readiness to attack

• enjambment creates sense of unstable movement

• nature = grotesque and threatening

Heaney uses violent, bodily imagery to express the speaker’s fear and physical revulsion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Poised like mud grenades”

A

simile = explicit war imagery → frogs = weapons

• “poised” = potential violence, suspense

• semantic field of conflict = emotional explosion building

• metaphor escalates fear into battlefield trauma

Heaney shows nature transformed into a war zone, mirroring the psychological rupture of adolescence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

“I sickened, turned, and ran.”

A

triadic list = physical, instinctive flight response

• monosyllables = blunt, raw, unfiltered

• caesura between each verb = fragmented fear

• nature = no longer wonder, but trauma

Heaney ends with emotional breakdown and total rejection of nature, symbolising childhood’s end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Title: Death of a Naturalist

A

ironic title → “death” not literal, but spiritual/emotional

• “Naturalist” = child fascinated by nature → identity shift

• suggests loss of innocence or worldview collapse

• foreshadows speaker’s transformation from wonder to fear

Heaney uses the title to signal a metaphorical death—the child’s wonder replaced by anxiety and disgust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Structure & Form

A

• 2 stanza structure = clear tonal shift (wonder → horror)

• enjambment = mimics child’s flowing thoughts → later disrupted

• volta between stanzas = emotional rupture, new perception

• irregular rhythm = speaker’s unease, especially in 2nd stanza

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Context

A

autobiographical → Heaney’s own rural upbringing in Northern Ireland

• interest in nature + Catholic background = tension between body, guilt, and beauty

• reflects childhood experiences + adult reflection

• published in 1966 → part of first collection exploring identity, growth, Irish landscape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Themes

A

Innocence → experience

• Nature: beauty vs brutality

• Fear, transformation, maturity

• Disgust + loss of control

• Conflict between past perception and new awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly