Design Argument Flashcards
Who said ‘With such signs of forethought in the design of living creatures, can you doubt that they are the work of choice or design?’
Socrates
The design argument is also called
The teleological argument
The basic argument for design goes something like
- The universe has order, regularity and a sense of purpose to it.
- The complexity of the universe shows evidence for design.
- Such design could only have been designed by a designer.
- The designer of the universe is God.
What is Design Qua Regularity?
The order and regularity that is evident in the universe is evidence for a designer.
Example of order and regularity in the universe.
A formal garden shows evidence of a designer because of lack of order (weeds) and regularity (arrangement of flowers). It came about through the work of a gardener, not by chance.
What is Thomas Aquinas’s fifth way?
He stated that everything is directed towards an end and as inanimate objects have no rational powers then they must be directed to this purpose by some external power.
What does Aquinas argue from in his fifth way?
Design qua regularity.
Why didn’t Aquinas believe the existence of God is self evident?
Because no human being could hear, touch, feel, smell or taste God. Our natural senses did not help us discover God.
Which two things in nature, taken together, does Aquinas think imply design?
The first is order (‘things act always, or nearly always, in the same way’).
The second is that the order in nature seems to be beneficial.
What is Design qua purpose?
This aspect of the design argument looks at design in relation to the ways in which the parts of the universe appear to fit together for some greater purpose.
What part of design does Paley argue in his watch analogy?
Design qua purpose.
What was Paley’s analogy about the watch?
That someone would know a pocket watch had been designed by a watch maker or designer, just from looking at the watch.
The universe is even more complex and there is even more order in the universe than a watch so there’s even more chance of a designer.
What was Paley’s analogy about the eye?
It is designed for the purpose of seeing, the various parts function in complex ways to produce sight.
What does Paley’s second argument argue from design?
Design qua regularity.
What was Paley’s second argument?
He used evidence from astronomy and Newton’s laws to say that the planets obeying th same universal laws couldn’t have happened by chance and an external agent must have imposed order.
Slight irregularities would have resulted in chaos.
What did Arthur Brown argue?
The ozone layer’s purpose, to filter out ultra-violet rays to protect life, couldn’t have happened by chance. ‘A wall which prevents death to every living thing’.
What does David Hume say the universe could have been designed by, rather than the classical theistic God?
- Several lesser gods.
- An apprentice god who has moved on to create better worlds.
- An evil god.
How did Hume criticise the design argument? (quote)
‘The world is very faulty and imperfect, compared to a superior standard’
Hume’s challenges to design.
- Human’s don’t have enough knowledge of creation to know there’s only one designer.
- It’s not a good analogy to compare the universe to a vast machine - the universe is something that grows of its own accord not made by hand and suggests many gods.
- Creation can’t be discussed in human terms because God transcends human understanding
Hume’s challenges from design.
- Even if the world was designed it can’t be proven the designer is God.
- If the world is ordered it could be because of chance - Epicurean analysis
What is the Epicurean analysis?
- The initial state of the universe was chaotic but gradually formed an ordered system.
- The universe is eternal so in unlimited time it was inevitable that order would develop.
John Mill’s challenge to the design argument
- Argued that the Design Argument points to God not existing.
- Evil and suffering do not point to an all-loving, powerful, knowing God.
- At least one of the attributes must be missing so it goes against the theistic God.
‘But pain insists upon being attended to. God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pains: it is His megaphone to rouse our deaf world’
C.S. Lewis’ response to John Mill’s challenge.