Descriptive Methods, Qualitative Methods & Sampling Flashcards
Hey Sam
Just here to remind you that you are incredibly amazing, I love you heaps and you make me very happy. You’re a truly good person and it’s impossible not to smile when you’re around
Non-experimental design
These methods allow you to describe a situation but don’t allow predictions or establish cause-and-effect.
Observational method
The basic form is observing human or animal behaviour. Not used often in psychology because we usually want to do more than ‘describe’ but it is a useful starting point. Also, some behaviours can’t be studied experimentally such as illegal behaviours.
The two types of observational studies
- Naturalistic / Field
2. Laboratory / Systematic
Naturalistic Observation
Good for observing “natural” or true behaviours. Such as eavesdropping. Observe people/animals in their natural habitat which increases ecological validity (the extent to which research can be generalised to real-life situations.
The options of Naturalistic Observation
- Undisguised observation: Participants aware they’re being watched
- Disguised observation: Ps unaware they’re being watched
- Participant observation: Researcher does participate in situation
- Nonparticipant observation: Researcher doesn’t participate in situation in which Ps are involved
Laboratory Observation
Good for observing behaviour in a “contrived” setting such as the Strange Situation Test. It focuses on fewer behaviours, the participants often know they will be observed but there are exceptions such as the Strange Situation. Experimenters can be participant or nonparticipant, disguised or undisguised. For example the Strange Situation Test is undisguised for mothers, but disguised for children, nonparticipant observation.
Potential problems of Laboratory observation
Undisguised observations may have a reactivity problem where they may simply react to being in a lab setting.
There are expectancy effects (is the researcher just paying attention to behaviours that support hypotheses).
Advantages of laboratory observation
Reduces time needed to conduct the study
Reduces cost
What are the means of data collection in observational studies
Narrative records
Checklists
Narrative records
Can be hand-written notes or video-tape (& notes taken later). Purpose is to capture everything a participant said or did during specified time period. Can be subjective (e.g., expectancy effects). Data must be coded in order to be analysed (time-consuming). Should be coded by more than one person (inter-rater reliability).
Checklists
A tally sheet where the researcher records P’s attributes or whether behaviours were observed. There are static attributes which do not change and action attributes that change based on the participants behaviour. Researchers must be clear on operational definitions of behaviours they plan to observe
Qualitative Methods
Social research uses observations / unstructured interviews in natural settings. Qualitative data is analysed / interpreted without statistics. Qualitative researchers are interested in the subjective experiences of people. Quantitative researchers begin with an aim / hypothesis and then make observations. Qualitative researchers make observations and, in the course of doing so, may develop hypotheses
Characteristics of Qualitative researchers
Expect unknowns
Flexible skill set
Resourceful
Natural environments
Interested in quality measurement
Characteristics of quantitative researchers
Maintain detachment
Value experimental controls and hypothesis testing
Interested in quantity measurement
“4 R’s criteria” for assessing quality, validity and value of qualitative research:
Rigour
Relevance
Resonance
Reflexivity
Rigour
Has the research been carried out competently?
Are the interpretations suitably justified and plausible?
Relevance
What contribution does the research make to the existing body of knowledge?
Resonance
Do the findings of their search ‘speak’ to the reader?
Does it resonate with many people’s experiences?
Reflexivity
Adopting an attitude of self-awareness & active reflection throughout the project > How do you influence the process?
Case Study Method
Comprises an “in-depth” study of one or a few individuals, groups, social settings or events. Provides foundation for future studies (i.e., hypothesis generating). Provides a method to study rare phenomena (e.g., split-brain patients).
Problems with the case study method
External validity: Individuals observed may be atypical (i.e., unrepresentative of population). Generalisations to population could be erroneous
Expectancy effects: Biased interpretation of observations or data collection
Archival method
Describing data that already exists. E.g. using case reports from welfare agencies to understand family violence. Many sources can be used such as the ABS.
Benefits of archival method
Low cost
No need to recruit/observe participants
Minimises reactivity
Less time consuming (because data already exist)
Problems of archival method
Low control
Hard to assess whether data are reliable/valid
Does archive provide ALL data that was collected?
Interviews
Typically involves asking questions in a face-to-face manner. They can be conducted anywhere.