Describe The Purposive Approach To Statutory Interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What is the purposive approach to statutory interpretation?

A

The purposive approach is a modern, broad approach that considers what Parliament intended to achieve when passing the Act, reflecting the whole purpose and spirit of the Act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who suggested a two-tier test for the purposive approach?

A

Lord Simons in Maunsell v Ollins suggested a two-tier test: first, look at the purpose of the legislation, and second, interpret the words to reflect that purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When did the purposive approach become more common?

A

The purposive approach became more common after the UK joined the European Union in 1973 and remains common even after leaving the EU.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case confirmed that EU law was supreme to UK law?

A

The case of Factortame confirmed that EU law was supreme to UK law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What broader context must judges consider in the purposive approach?

A

Judges must consider the broader context, including the concerns of the Government at the time the Act was created.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Hansard and how is it used in the purposive approach?

A

Hansard can be used to find out the purpose of the legislation, as established in Pepper v Hart.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the outcome of Registrar General ex parte Smith regarding the Adoption Act 1976?

A

The court held that Mr. Smith was not entitled to his birth certificate, as it was not Parliament’s intention to promote serious crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did the purposive approach apply in Jones v Tower Boot?

A

The court held that Parliament’s intention was to remove racism in the workplace, thus the victim was entitled to compensation despite the employer’s argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does S3 of the Human Rights Act state about legislation interpretation?

A

S3 states that legislation should be interpreted in a way that is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the significance of Godin-Mendoza v Ghaidan?

A

The case resulted in the interpretation of ‘living with the original tenant as his or her wife or husband’ to include same-sex partners, granting them the same rights as heterosexual couples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly