Describe The Golden Rule Of Statutory Interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What is the golden rule of statutory interpretation?

A

The golden rule is a modification of the literal rule, defined as avoiding absurdity produced by the literal rule if Parliament did not intend such an absurdity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two approaches a judge can take under the golden rule?

A

The judge can take a narrow approach or a broad approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the narrow approach in the golden rule?

A

The narrow approach involves choosing between different meanings of a word or phrase.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the broad approach in the golden rule?

A

The broad approach involves altering the one meaning of a word or phrase to avoid absurdity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case exemplifies the narrow approach?

A

Adler v George exemplifies the narrow approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the issue in Adler v George?

A

The court interpreted the Official Secrets Act 1920 regarding obstructing soldiers ‘in the vicinity’ of a prohibited place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the outcome of Adler v George?

A

The court held that a man who obstructed a soldier inside a prohibited place was guilty of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case exemplifies the broad approach?

A

Re Sigsworth exemplifies the broad approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the issue in Re Sigsworth?

A

The court used abroad approach to interpret the administration of justice act 1925 under which the issue of a person would inherit their state or a person who died without making a will in this case a mother had died without making a will but had been murdered by her sonThe literal rule was not followed as it would have been an injustice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does S53 of the Human Rights Act state?

A

As far as is possible, legislation should be interpreted in a way which is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the outcome of the case Godin-Mendoza v Ghaidan?

A

The phrase ‘living with the original tenant as his or her wife or husband’ was interpreted as ‘AS IF they were his or her wife or husband’, giving same-sex partners the same rights as heterosexual couples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly