Depth - The loss of the American colonies 1770-83 Flashcards
Tensions between Britain and American Colonists - Townshend Duties -
What were they?
Colonists had argued against the Stamp Act 1765 by saying that the British had no right to tax internally but had conceded parliament’s right to regulate trade - removed in 1766
1767-1770 - duties on the imports of glass, wine, china, lead, paint, paper and tea - light.
Assemblies went further than they had ever done in presenting formal protests against the new duties e.g. the Massachusetts Assembly published a denunciation of the Townshend Duties for violating the principle of ‘no taxation without representation’ and 7 other colonial assemblies quickly endorsed this letter
Boycotts were organised, which were well organised and violent protests in Boston. British military presence, both naval and military, increased in Boston from 1768 to ensure the collection of duties and the protection of the American Board of Customs Commissioners
Boston resistance was led by the Sons of Liberty, a well organised paramilitary organisation founded in 1765 in opposition to the British attempts at taxation
Tensions between Britain and American Colonists - tax deadlock
1770
Britain wanted the colonies money for the cost of defence – 1760s attempt to get money from duties under the Navigation Acts
To the colonies Britain was trying to extend their power by collecting duties and was tyrannical as the only proper way to raise money was by colonial assemblies and spent locally not for the empire
NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
Tensions between Britain and American Colonists - Other Reasons
Most white men had a sense of independence which was new to them – they had the same status as landowners and voters in Europe – loyalties lie to their community and churches not so much Britain or America
Colonist were highly involved in their own self –government and practiced a form of democracy – they were better off in American than in Britain for voting rights
The legislative assemblies were at the heart of opposition to British taxes and provided a forum for debate and coherent response to new laws – they had the means to say no to Britain
Opposition came from each individual colony so when they joined together it went a lot smoother as they had been making separate and unsuccessful protests for 10 years
Boston Massacre
1770
Street fight between a ‘patriot’ mob, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed, and 9 British soldiers shot
Isolated event as there was, no communication, so failed to spark the revolution
Why was the Boston Massacre not the start of the American War of Independence? - British repeal of the hated Townshend Duties
The pause on hostility was due to the repeal of Townshend duties in 1770 except on tea. The tax still represented continued tyranny and limited legal duties were ever paid resulting in tea smuggling
Despite the British being prepared to repeal them, they did not changed their stance on America paying taxes, the existence of loyalists in the colonies and a lack of unity between colonists
But, the Colonists remained alert for new infringements on liberties – without a new approach to taxation of America confrontation was inevitable
Years of Calm 1770-73 represent a dampening down of tensions but no resolution to them
Why was the Boston Massacre not the start of the American War of Independence? - existence of a significant number of loyalists in the colonies
Loyalists represented around 20% of the population
Patriot support a its highest was 40-45%
The rest of the population were neutrals
Loyalists tended to be on the margins of colonial society and made up of smaller groups with varying interest and a wide geographical spread.
On the whole the wealthier members of colonial society did not support the British
Loyalists included minority groups like the South back-country farmers, Anglicans in New England, the Germans and Dutch of New York and some of the more recent Scots immigrants to the colonies
When the conflict began, far more slaves fought for the British in the exchange for their freedom but the British were unwilling to destablise society by promising wholesale freedom for slaves and there was no large-scale recruitment for Black Americans, who made 1/6 of the population
Why was the Boston Massacre not the start of the American War of Independence? - lack of unity between the colonists.
If the British wished to win the neutrals over during the years of clam they needed to be more active than they were in promoting the benefits of British rule
Divisions in American society hampered the patriots - As well as the ethnic and religious subdivisions in American society, there was a gulf between the rich and the poor, and in Virginia and California, between those in the more extensivley settled Tidewater areas and those fighting to establish claims in the back coutnry
The early 1770s was a period of relative civil war in the Carolinas when the Regualtor movement made up of small armers rose up against the corrupt Tidewater officals
The patriots used the years of calm more effectivley to promote unity than the British - in 1771 Sam Adams proposed establishing the Committee of Correspondence whose role was to communicate in writing colonial grievances to all the towns in Massachusetts and by mid-1773, 50 other tows in Massachusetts had their own committee established.
By 1774 every colony expect North Carolina and Pensylvannia had its own committee. This new system the British could not control, meaning the patriots had a powerful tool ready to use to convert neutrals into patriots if neccessary
What was The Tea Act
1773
The Townshend duties were repealed in 1770 but the duty on tea remained and was enforced through this act
Under the act the British EIC was granted a monopoly on the American tea trade in an attempt to shore up the EIC as Britain had been squeezing money out of it to pay off some national debt
The EIC was exempt on tariffs and allowed to ship tea directly to the colonies as it was hoped to increase the profits for the EIC, saving them from bankruptcy
The Colonists were then taxed through the Tea Act which upset Americans as it would prevent them from making profit on this trade likely making them feel as though the British had stunted their freedom
Impact of the Tea Act
Increase in smuggling- American colonists brought 410,000 kg of foreign tea- mostly from the Dutch
Revolutionary feeling rose - The Sons of Liberty started to encourage people to disregard British laws and buy illegal tea
Merchants who had been acting as middlemen in legally importing tea stood to lose their business to the EIC agents. Merchants dealing with the illegal Dutch tea trade would be undercut by the Company’s lowered prices. Directly impacted shopkeepers who would only be allowed to purchase tea from merchants selected by the EIC and their monopoly. Only ships owned by the EIC could carry tea- American ships would be redundant
Favouritism- Consignees who were to receive the tea and arrange for its local resale were generally favourites of the local governor. The Governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson, was a part-owner of the business hired by the East India Company to receive tea shipped to Boston.
Boston Tea Party
1773 the Dartmouth sailed into Boston with EIC tea with other ships following
Patriots were determined that Boston should set an example to other colonies
After discussions with the governor and patriots, 60 Sons of Liberty boarded the 3 ships and threw about £10k worth of tea into the sea
British response was outrage- faced a fundamental challenge and the colonies should be taught a lesson. Tried to isolate Boston and Massachusetts (lockdown the city and the state under effectively military control). Intended to punish the colony, but underestimated the extent of intercolonial links and the level to which patriot support already existed in the other colonies
Coercive Acts
1774-1775
The Boston Port Act - closed the port of Boston until the EIC was paid for the lost tea which created a hardship for people whose livelihood depended on trade
Massachusetts Government Act - took away many self-governing rights with the aim of punishing Boston and forcing the end of resistance. Almost all positions in the colonial gov were to be appointed by the governor or King with freedom of assembly being limited
Administration of Justice Acts - British officials accused of committing crimes in colonies may be taken to England for trial which meant witnesses would be forced to travel with the thought the officials would escape justice
The Quartering Act - Allowed the British to quarter British soldiers in colonial buildings at the expense of the colonists, including colonists’ homes, if there was insufficient space elsewhere
The Quebec Act - extended the boundaries of the province of Quebec. Quebec didn’t have representative assemblies and there was a limits to trial by jury. Many saw this as an attempt to further erode the liberties of Americans and establish tyrannical rule
Continental Congress (result of Coercive Act)
The Coercive Acts did not succeed in isolating Boston
Colonial assembly after assembly had to be dissolved by their governors but continued to meet in defiance of British law.
Met for the 1st time in 1774 - 1st de facto gov:
Supported the views of the radicals despite moderates like Joseph Galloway arguing that Britain had the right to regulate trade within its empire. Called upon Massachusetts to arm for defence. Proclaimed the right of each colony to determine its own need for troops. The day-to-day running largely passed into the hands of the committees by early 1775. Not the case in Boston where General Gage maintained control with the troops he had to hand, while writing distractedly to London for more and more men
Britain declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion in 1775.
Some members of the English establishment saw the danger and the Earl of Chatham proposed the removal of all duties from the Americas, recognising the power of the Continental Congress
Rejected by the House of Lords and Britain began to prepare for war
Issues with starting military escalations
The British under General Gage had only 4,000 troops available
Became apparent after the 1st military action Britain might control Boston, but would be unable to hold down Massachusetts, let alone the other 12 colonies.
General Gage, the commander in chief at the outbreak of the conflict, did not act decisively in the early stages of the rebellion, and his replacement, Howe, was slow to act in 1776
Military Action Escalations - Lexington and Concord
1775 General Gage unsuccessfully seized munitions from Salem
Attempted a secret mission in April 1775 to Concord to seize and destroy a military store but were met by 75 volunteers at Lexington and the 1st shots rang out
The British pushed onto Concord and destroyed the stores, but were fired on all the way back to Boston - saved from total disaster by the arrival of relief soldiers.
Total British casualties were 273, and 73 were killed
Shortly after, Boston was besieged and surrounded by 20,000 colonial militia.
Military Action Escalations - Bunker Hill
Reinforcements arrived in Boston with Generals Howe, Clinton and Burgoyne in May 1775 with a few thousand more troops- sparked the bloodiest engagement of the war
The British attempted a full frontal assault against the rebels in June.
Over 1,000 of the 2,500 British engaged in the battle became casualties.
The Americans lost fewer than half that number
The British carried the position, but ⅛ of British officers who were killed in the entire conflict died in the engagement so it cannot be called a victory, especially as the British were shortly besieged frequently by the new colonial army under Washington
George III then issued a Proclamation in August 1775 declaring all colonies in a state of open rebellion.
In 1776 the British were forced to evacuate Boston for Nova Scotia.