Depth - the British in India 1829-58 Flashcards
Role of the East India Company
Had three private armies on the field, one for each of the company presidencies (Bengal, Madras and Bombay), to protect its trading interests and to support its local collaborators
Nabobs earned large private fortunes, but poor management and corruption meant gov took over EIC’s structure and Acts were passed in 1773, 1784 and 1786 to establish the relationship between the East India Company and parliament.
Relationship between EIC and gov was altered by free trade – while the charter renewed in 1813 and 1833, they reduced and then ended the trade monopoly which hastened the evolving function of the Company.
Changes in Company functions from the Charter Acts caused Company reps to think about the way the territory should be controlled, administered and ‘improved” and now British reps now saw themselves as rulers, rather engaging and protecting commercial interests.
Instead of concentrating on trade, they were now more than ever involved in local administration and tax collection. They had been tax collecting for local princes for many years, but as only one aspect of their commercial activities.
However, the EIC could put private armies equal or stronger than the locals, central to their growing tax role and locals allied for protection from others and tax collection. Company civil servants oversaw tax collection, supported by Company’s armies.
Role of the Governor Generals
From 1773 the Governor was appointed was by a council of four (Crown appointed) bringing the governor under Crown control. Warren Hastings served as first governor under this system from 1774 to 1785. Other presidents of EIC territory, in Madras, Bombay and Bencoolen, could not make war or accept a peace from an Indian prince without the approval of the governor in Bengal.
1784 India Act – strengthened governor’s executive power and stipulated other presidencies couldn’t make war or peace unless told by Bengal, giving foreign policy control to Benga governor + 1736 Act enabled governors to override their council if deemed necessary
1st governor with increased powers was Lord Cornwallis (fresh from Yorktown defeat) appointed as commander-in-chief of Indian forces
Due to legislation between 1774 and 1784, government regulation was extended over EIC, especially over political activities and over this era there was power centralisation within the presidencies, giving the Bengali governor power over the other two presidencies.
In 1833, due to the Government of India Act, the governor general became the coexisting governor general of India and filled by the Board of Directors of EIC, but subject to the Crown but due to slow communications they used huge powers and autonomy comparable to other governors in British colonies – Sir William Bentinck (new GovGen) was responsible for territory foreign policy and administration but had legislative control over all Company territory
Importance of the Company Army
1820 – troops numbered 200,000 with men of all ethnicities under European officers – ensured local rulers signed treaties for protection against other local rules or self-preservation from British military superiority and armies supported tax collection and admin roles. Strength meant that Company territory increased notably – Sir Wellesley (1798-1805) increase territory and stop French influence
Training of civil servants and military personnel reflected the change to civil administration in the 19th century, as it developed from a purely commercial company with hired mercs. Recruits shared the same sense of cultural superiority as Civil Service intake.
1829–1853 – EIC fought several campaigns in Afghanistan, Sind and the Punjab with varying success – successfully annexed Assam, Manipur and Cacher between 1823 and 1826 (costly)
British obsession was fuelled by fear of a Russian invasion, through Afghanistan or Sind through Persia. The First Afghan War from 1838 to 1842 was a disaster after the governor was foolish enough to be persuaded by his secretary to meddle in Afghan internal politics without support of the Punjab ruler – cost Britain 20,000 lives and over £15 million and the immediate impact made the Company determined to secure Sind and the Punjab in compensation.
Sind was formally annexed in 1843, following a decisive campaign, but the Punjab took the 1840s until 1849. The British admiration for the warlike Sikhs was repaid during the Indian Rebellion when the Sikhs supported the British against the rebellious local soldiers, partly as a result of long-held grievances relating to the Anglo-Sikh wars of annexation, which had been fought in part by sepoy regiments of different religions.
The bitterness which the Punjabi soldiers nursed towards the native sepoys of the Bengali Company army illustrates the complicated local tensions that the Company was so successfully able to exploit as it expanded its presence in the subcontinent
Importance of the Bengal Army
Most important presidency in the Company in the 19th century and its president was the governor general of all the territory controlled by the EIC after the Government of India Act 1833.
Administrative structure of Bengal was developed under the governor generalship of Lord Cornwallis (1786-93) and the system laid down in his Code of Regulations was the framework of Indian government for nearly two centuries.
Land put into districts under collectors and landholders settled with land rights for fixed tax liabilities. Collectors were supervised by the Board of Revenue at Calcutta. Legal administration was placed in the hands of local judges and magistrates, who were supervised by regional courts of appeal. Until 1911, Calcutta was the capital of British India and the building of the initial British trading factory of Fort William can still be seen in modern-day Kolkata.
The Bengal army was twice the size of the other armies. Traditionally recruited from among the higher castes who held privileges, which they guarded, and they were to sensitive caste pollution. Bengali sepoys were from provinces, like Awadh and played a pivotal role in Punjab annexation with resulting Sikh enmity to sepoys was part of British survival in rebellion (1857)
Importance of the British Army
The British Army had only one European regiment between Calcutta and Agra, which made asserting initial control difficult and played a part in encouraging the native soldiers to take action
Culture Clashes between India and Britain - Company operators
Becoming less tolerant of local customs and religions and increasingly seeking to change society
Sense of cultural superiority emerging in the Company staff resulting in the paternalistic desire to change and ‘improve’ Indians
Cultural clashes between India and Britain - Christianity
Racial harmony was challenged by a growth of evangelical Christinaity and the arrival of more British women in India
Committed Christians challenged inequality resulting in laudable campaigns e.g. the abolition of slavery.
They judged other religions and by extension societies to be inferior because they were not Christian.
Increasingly, missionaries attempted to convert the Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists whom they found on the subcontinent and this often destabilised local social systems
Cultural challenges between India and Britain - British women
Reinforced a sense of growing cultural division between the Company employees and Indians with British women increasingly coming to find themselves husbands.
Racial intermingling that had been commonplace in the 18th century was now socially taboo.
Mixed-race children were not accepted in the developing white ‘society’ in India and, while an English man could visit the home of another Englishman with an Indian wife or partner, no English woman would do so.
In 1780 ⅓ Company men left wills making provisions for native spouses or cohabitees and their children.
By 1950 the wills of Company men show that only a tiny proportion of men were involved in relationships with indian women
What is Thagi?
Thagi was most prevalent in northern India and was the legal assault which began in the 1830s.
They practiced highway robbery and ritual murder by strangling in service of a Hindu goddess. Bands of up to 400 Thagi existed acting in small groups preying on travelers by befriending and accompanying them, before stealing and strangling them
How did the British restrict Thagi?
1835 campaign- led by Colonel William Sleeman followed his capture of a thagi who described the practices. Led to Sleeman becoming devoted to its eradication.
1836-1848 a number of Acts were passed outlawing thagi and dacoity (a form of banditry) which became a justification for further ‘modernisation’ by the British
1835- the Thuggee and Dacoity Department was created with Sleeman as the superintendent with a vigorous and highly publicised campaign happening
Over 1,000 thagi were transported or hanged and around 3,000 tried and punished. Used their confessions to track and capture others.
The reaction to suppresing Thagi
Congratulation by the British as the thagi only attacked other Indians, so it was depicted as an unselfish act which led to him being identified as a true imperial hero in Britain.
Actual thagi activity seems to have been largely dealt with by Sleeman’s efforts. The suppression did not seem to have been widely resented at the time, unlike other campaigns resulting from the ‘modernising agenda.
What was Sati?
The tradition of self-immolation by Hindu widows on the funeral pyres of their husbands which reflected the Hindu belief that remarriage was not an option for widows- most common among higher castes
The caste involved suggests the motivation was primarily religion not economic
Occurred most commonly in the Bengal presidency and the Sikh Punjabi kingdom, which was outside British jurisdiction in 1829.
The British estimated that around 600 deaths a year in their territories was a result of the custom
The campaign to restrict Sati
In 1813 Wilberforce forced an amendment to the 1813 Charter Law to allow missionaries to preach against sati and other Hindu practices.
The Hindu religious philosopher, Ram Mohan Roy began to campaign against the practice in 1818, following the death of his sister-in-law, who was forced to commit sati.
British Company officials disliked the practice and had tried to discourage it for years but without Govenor Bentinck, it is unlikely abolition would have been implemented as early
Bentinck’s long and detailed minute- shows he even gave serious thought to the possible consequences of introducing the ban
How did the British suppress Sati?
The Company banned the practice in Calcutta in 1798
The Act of Abolition in 1829 abolished sati - anyone assisting was deemed to be guilty of culpable homicide and prosecuted accordingly
Roy counselled Bentinck against the ban in 1829, judging it to be too contentious but once the ban was in place he supported
Efforts were made to reverse the law, but Roy presented evidence to the Privy Council where Bentinck’s law was upheld in 1832.
The law only applied in territory under the control of the Company, although encouragement many of the princely states followed in the 1830s and 1840s.
The practice was outlawed in the entirety of India in 1861, although cases continued throughout the 19th century.
The reaction to suppressing Sati
Was not received positively by Indians
For higher caste Indians who practised sati, the interference by the British was a deliberate attack on caste purity and the presumption of cultural superiority inherent in the new law.
Represents a new departure in terms of gov intervention in Indian society, and in the case of sati of ritual religious practice
The intervention contributed to the rumbling discontent towards British rule which existed in the 1830s and 1840s.