Deception Flashcards

1
Q

definition of deception

A

an act INTENDED to foster in another, a belief than the deceiver considers false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

key

A

conscious delberate intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

deceptions dual nature

A

communication of specific info, and metacommunication about the truth value of the content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

deception v. leakage cues

A
  • deception cues: info that gives away the falsehood

- leakage cues: info that gives away the true info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cue competition

A

when verbal and nonverbal signs carry implications that are at odds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

*detection apprehension

A

fear of being caught at telling a lie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

*The Othello Error

A

occurs when a lie catcher fails to consider that a truthful person who is under stress may appear to be lying; truthful people may be afraid of being disbelieved (Ex: nervous even though not guilty, police example)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

underlying emotional factors in deception

A
  • fear (detection apprehension)
  • guilt (deception guilt)
  • excitement (duping delight, ex: Rope by Hitchcock, Tell Tale Heart, invited police over)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why do most lies fail?

A

-either inadequate preparation or the interference of emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

theoretical approaches to deception (4)

A
  • attempted control (lacking in spontaneoity)
  • arousal (lying makes people aroused, will amp up nonverbal behaviors)
  • affect (lots of emotions, especially when stakes are hight)
  • cognitive load (lying is difficult, easier to tell the truth, have to keep story straight)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

humans are poor lie detectors- Vrij, 2000 study

A
  • reviewed 40 studies
  • 67% accuracy for detecting truths
  • 44% for detecting lies
  • high accuracy for truth, low for lies= “truth bias”
  • we assume people tell us the truth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

humans as poor lie detectors- Bond and DePaulo, 2006

A
  • results from 206 reports and 24,483 judges
  • people achieve an average of 54% correct lie-truth judgments
  • correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as non deceptives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

human as poor lie detectors- 2008, Bond and DePaulo

A
  • reviewed 142 studies
  • 19,801 judges
  • mean accuracy of 54.05% in discriminating lies from truths
  • mean of 55.5% accuracy for truth judgements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusion of humans as poor lie detectors

A
  • people do not do much better than chance at detecting deception
  • people typically report extremely high confidence in their detection ability, this is misplaced confidence (bad, but think they are good)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How good are the pros?

A
  • students interviewed twice by police officers
  • in both interviews, denied having a pair of headphones, when in fact they really did in one of the interviews
  • 360 police watched the video taped interviews
  • accuracy rates low
  • in the BEST condition, police performed at 60%
  • their confidence was high
  • the correlation between their confidence and actual ability to detect deception was r=.04 (virtually 0, hardly any relationship whatsoever)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

1995 truth bias

A
  • people are especially likely to judge familiar vs. unfamiliar persons as truthful
  • “my partner has been honest in the past, therefore they are being truthful now”
17
Q

detecting deception in children

A
  • induced 3-7 year olds to lie
  • temptation resistance paradigm
  • college students watched video taped interrogation
  • 3-7 year olds have not fully developed their deception skills
  • however, judges could only accurately detect liars based on nonverbal cues
18
Q

is anyone good at detecting lies?

A
  • NO, no compelling evidence that some people are good and others not
  • the standard deviation of judges detection abilities is only 1%, someone at the 86th percentile of detection ability is only 1% better than someone at the 16th percentile
19
Q

why are humans poor lie detectors?

A
  • lack of motivation to catch liars (ostrich effect)
  • absence of Pinocchio’s nose (single cue that indicates lying)
  • countermeasures (deliberately attempt to conceal lies, appear credible)
  • embedded lies (embedded with truth-most truths)
  • no adequate feedback (not instant or immediate, may never know)
  • violation of conversational rules
  • good liars (sociopaths, pathological liars)
20
Q

common errors in lie detection

A
  • examining the wrong cues
  • overemphasis on nonverbals
  • the othello error
  • overconfidence in lie detection abilities
  • use of heuristics
  • neglect of interpersonal differences (naturally fidgety, eye contact, etc.)
21
Q

the following are significantly associated with deception

A
  • providing fewer details
  • making less sense
  • internal discrepancies
  • repetitions
  • less verbal/vocal involvement
  • fewer illustrators
  • less verbal immediacy
  • pupil dialation
  • increased vocal pitch (hardest to control)
  • THESE WILL BE ON TEST
22
Q

following NOT associated with deception

A
  • eye contact
  • speech disturbances
  • smiling
  • silent pauses
  • head nods
  • response latency
  • shrugs
  • posture shifts
  • speech rate
  • foot/leg movements
  • response duration
  • self-fidgeting
23
Q

detecting deceptive communication

A
  • 73 nurses watched video
  • they were interviewed and had to either tell a truth about the video or lie
  • liars: fewer illustrators and hand movements, more ah-speech disturbances, and longer response latencies than truth tellers
  • using these 4 NV behaviors, 71% of truth tellers and 85% of liars were correctly classified
24
Q

be attentive to microexpressions

A
  • momentary expressions of facial emotion
  • squelched almost immediately
  • insight into underlying emotion