cultural variations Flashcards
what are cultural variations in attachment?
differences in norms and values about childrearing and how parents are expected to behave.
what was Van Ijzendor’s and Kroonenberg’s aim ? (1988)
study to investigate the proportion of secure, insecure-avoidant, and insecure-resistant attachment across a range of countries.
What else did Van Ijzendor’s and Kroonenberg look at?
They also looked at the difference within the same country to get an idea of the variations within a culture.
what was the procedure for cultural variations?
- carried out a meta-analysis of the findings from 32 studies carried out in 8 different countries using the strange situation to measure attachment
-32 studies yielded results for 1,900 children.
-All studies at least 35 mother and infant pairs with infants below 2 years of age. The research included individualist cultures (e.g., US, Great Britain, Germany) and collectivist cultures (e.g. Japan, China, Israel):
What was the overall attachment?
Overall attachment was: secure 67%, insecure-avoidant 21% and insecure-resistant 12%.
what was the most common attachment type?
-Secure attachment
- proportion varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China.
What was the overall least common type of attachment?
• Insecure-resistant was overall the least common type although it was found more in Israel, Japan, and China.
Where were insecure attachments observed the most?
germany
Where were insecure avoidant attachments observed the most?
Israel and Japan (collectivist countries at the time)
what was an interesting finding?
-the variation within the same country was actually 1.5 times greater than those between countries.
-In the USA, for example, one study found only 46% securely attached compared to one sample as high as 90%.
what is the conclusion for cultural variations?
-the global pattern of attachment across cultures appears to be similar to that found in the U.S.
-supports the idea that secure attachment is ‘best’ for healthy social and emotional development.
-Secure attachment seems to be the norm in a wide range of cultures, confirming Bowlby’s idea that attachment is innate and universal.