cultural variations Flashcards
cultural variations
differences in the norms and values that exist between people in different groups
in attachment research we are concerned with the differences in the proportion of children of different attachment types
van ijzendoorn and kronenburg procedure
located 32 studies of attachment where strange situation used
8 different countries - 15 in US
1990 children
meta-analysis
van ijzendoorn and kroonenberg findings
wide variation
individualistic cultures - insecure-resistant similar to ainsworth - all under 14%
collectivist cultures - all above 25%
korean study
jin et al
study to compare proportions of attachment types in korea to other studies
87 babies
proportions of insecure and secure similar to those in most countries with most babies being secure
more found to be insecure resistant and only one baby insecure avoidant
similar to Japan
conclusions
secure attachment is norm across all cultures
- supports bowlby’s idea attachment is innate and universal and this type is universal norm
cultural practices have an influence on attachment type
indigenous researchers
P - strength is most of studies conducted by indigenous psychologists
E - same cultural background and participants
E - avoids potential problems of cross-cultural research such eg misinterpretations and bias
L - good change researchers and participants communicated successfully - enhances validity
P - not true for all cross-cultural attachment research
E - Morelli and Tronick were outsiders from america
E - datta might have been affected by difficulties in gathering data from participants
L - data from some countries might have been affected by bias and difficulty in cross-cultural communication
confounding variables
P - limited as cross-cultural research impacted by confounding variables on findings
E - research not usually matched for methodology - sample characteristics such as poverty, social class can confound results
E - environmental variables can confound eg size of room
L - looking at attachment behaviour in different non-matched studies conducted in different countries may not tell us about cross-cultural patterns of attachment
imposed etic
P - limited as trying to impose a test designed for one cultural context to another context
E - imposed etic occurs when we assume an idea or technique that works in one cultural context will work in another
E - eg britain and us - lack of affection on reunion - avoidant but in germany - independence rather than insecurity
L - behaviours measures may not have same meanings so comparison is meaningless