CRITICAL APPRAISAL AND STUDIES Flashcards
what are advantages of systematic reviews?
its a rigorous summary of all the research evidence that relates to a specific question
by bringing together all the relevant evidence, disadvantages of single studies can be gaurded against e.g. larger sample size, less false negative results and increases power
able to see if effects are consistent across different clinical populations
identifies all available evidence rather than cherry picking evidence
what makes a search strategy on a data base strong?
look at multiple data bases
look at publications in all languages
use grey literature
unpublished studies also included
no date or publication type restrictions applied
manual searches were done too by contacting the author
why is it important to assess the quality of a study in a systematic review?
studies with
weaker designs will be less valid and can overestimate effects.
why are RCTs less prone to bias?
groups are likely to be similar with respect tp known and unknown determinants of outcome so we can be confident that any observed differences in outcome are due to the intervention
randomisation of allocation of groups which means any observed differences in outcome are due t the intervention not baseline characteristic differences
what is a meta analysis?
a statistical technique for combining the results of multiple studies that measure the same outcome into a single summative estimate
what is a 95% confidence interval?
the range between two value within with it is 95% probable that the true value lies for the whole population of patients from which the study patients are selected
what is an odds ratio?
a ratio of the odds of an event in an exposed group to the odds of the same event in a group not exposed
why is random allocation important?
to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors in order to create a control group that is as similar as possible to the treatment group
why is it important that baseline characteristics are similar at the start of the study?
If the groups are different at the start of the study (i.e. baseline), then it will be unclear whether
any effect of the intervention was because of this original difference or because the actual
intervention had an effect.
what will make baseline characteristics similar?
if randomisation process worked and the trial is big enough
why is it important that groups are treated the same, other than the intervention?
If the groups were treated differently (e.g. one group had more consultations with a doctor, or
more tests) then it could be that it was the different treatment one group received that has
caused a differences in outcome, rather than the intervention itself. The strength of the RCT
design is the element of control (hence the name); that is, changing something about a patient’s
treatment while controlling other things
what should loss to follow up be?
<20%
what does loss to follow up mean?
not
providing follow-up data at a particular time point.
why is it important to use intention to treat analysis?
to preserve the value of randomisation
If the trial loses a lot of patients during the intervention, it reduces the sample size and weakens
the findings. If patients are lost from one group more than another in a trial, this can bias the
results
why is blinding important?
This is necessary to avoid the patient’s reporting of symptoms or the clinician’s interpretation of
them being affected by whether they know which group the patients is in, and whether or not
they think the treatment is effective
in what situation is blinding unimportant?
if the outcome is objective e.g death
what is relative risk?
how many times more likely it is that an event will occur in the treatment group relative to the control group.
how do you calculate relative risk?
risk of outcome in treatment group / risk of outcome in control group
what does a relative risk of <1 mean? what does a relative risk of >1 mean?
An RR <1 means that the treatment decreases the risk of an outcome. An RR >1 means that the treatment increased the risk of an outcome.
what is the absolute risk reduction/risk difference?
the difference between the risk of an outcome in the exposed group and the unexposed group.
how id absolute risk difference calculated?
risk of the outcome in control group - risk of outcome in treatment group
what is the relative risk reduction?
It tells us the reduction of the rate of the outcome in the treatment group relative to that in the control group.
how do we calculate relative risk reduction?
absolute risk reduction / risk of outcomes in control group
what is number needed to treat?
s the number of patients we need to treat with the experimental therapy (rather than the control group therapy) in order to prevent one bad outcome over a stated period of time
how do we calculate number needed to treat?
1/ absolute risk reduction
what is a point estimate?
the use of sample data to calculate a single value which is to serve as a “best guess” or “best estimate” of an unknown population parameter
what are some appropriate techniques to reduce confounding?
restriction, stratification, matching and multiple regression techniques
whats the issue with having a follow-up period that is too short?
risks missing a real association
whats the issue with having a follow-up period that is too long?
wastes money and is arguably unethical
how do you calculate an odds ratio>
dividing the odds of the first group by the odds in the second group
what is an odds ratio?
a measure of association between an exposure and an outcome.
how can you tell if evidence is precise?
small CI because of a large cohort
how do you know if a CI is statistically significant?
it doesnt include 1.0
what is a type 1 error?
when you mistakenly reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true (false positive)
what is a type 2 eror?
mistakenly accept the null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis is actually true (false negative)
whats the difference between a random and systematic error?
Random error mainly affects precision, which is how reproducible the same measurement is under equivalent circumstances. In contrast, systematic error affects the accuracy of a measurement, or how close the observed value is to the true value.
what is selection bias?
systematic error in creating intervention groups, such that they differ with respect to prognosis due to baseline characteristics and are not representative of the population
what is information bias?
the bias that occurs during data collection and causes a systematic error
whats an observational study?
where researchers observe the effect of a risk factor, diagnostic test, treatment or other intervention without trying to change who is or isn’t exposed to it.
what is risk?
the probability that an event will occur during a specific time
what is odds?
the probability that an event will or will not happen (likelihood or a particular outcome)
which studies use odds ratios?
case-control mostly
cohort and cross-sectional can too
which study uses relative risk?
cohort studies
what is prevalence and how do you calculate it?
proportion of persons who have a condition at or during a particular time period
number of individuals having the disease at a specific time/number of individuals in the population at the point in time
what is incidence and how do you calculate it?
proportion of persons who have a condition at or during a particular time period
sum of all new episodes of disease / total population in a specific time period
what are some problems with historical studies?
has the standard care changed?
are the groups of people you are comparing similar?
whats the main problem with before and after studies
regresson to the mean - the tendency of results that are extreme by chance on first measurement to move closer to the average when measured a second time
why do we randomise?
to eliminate systematic bias in allocation of interventions
to ensure balance across comparative groups for any confounding variables that could affect the outcome