Crime and deviance Flashcards
Strain theory - Merton
- society has major stress on being successful (goals)
- it is impossible for everyone to achieve success in socially acceptable way (means)
- stress on achieving goals promotes deviant behaviour
- there is a strain on what people want to achieve and what they can achieve
- responses to anomie: conformity, innovation (accepts goals, rejects means), ritualism (means accepted, lost sight of goals), retreatism (goals and means forgotten - drugs), rebellion (rejection of goals and mean, have alternative ones - terrorists)
evaluation of strain theory
- fails to explain why an individual chooses one deviant act over another
- only focuses on utilitarian crime - what about vandalism, fighting etc.
- ignores why some find it harder to achieve society’s goals than others - inequality, and why majority of people are law-abiding when many people feel the means is to hard
Control theory - Hirschi
- everyone is potentially deviant and law abiding behaviour is abnormal
- there is no cause of criminal behaviour
- the point is not to seek causes but to understand how social control is achieved
- criminal activity is when individual attachment to society is weakened
- Attachment - extent to which we’re concerned about needs of others
- commitment - how much we invested in our life
- involvement - how busy is our lifestyle
- belief - amount of conviction we have in terms of obeying rules of society
- Hirschi found a correlation between these factors - more attached to conventional people and activities, less likely to commit crime
- eg. boys doing well in school, close to fathers, less likely to have delinquent friends
evaluation of control theory
- feminists - ‘malestream’ sociology - although his conclusions rest on boys’ attitudes and beliefs, his theories are supposed to apply to adults and both sexes
- Marxists - people aren’t naturally inclined to commit crime - class and culture is more important factor, fails to recognise why some feel more marginalised
Cohen - status frustration
- most crime is committed in groups is not always utilitarian crime committed for material gain
- WC boys fail in MC school system as they face cultural deprivation and are left at bottom of status hierarchy
- unable to achieve by legitimate means - status frustration
- resolve frustration by rejecting MC values and joining delinquent subculture where norms are reverse of mainstream
- subcultures offer an alternative status hierarchy where status is achieved through delinquent means
evaluation of status frustration
+ explains non-utilitarian crime eg. vandalism
- assumes WC boys start off with MC goals and reject them when they fails, ignores that they may have never shared these goals and don’t see themselves as failures
- unlikely that delinquent subcultures consciously invert norms of mainstream culture
Cloward and Ohlin - 3 types of subcultures that lead to crime
Criminal (eg. mafia):
- in neighbourhoods with stable criminal culture and established hierarchy
- youth associate with adult criminals and are provided with opportunities to succeed in criminal career
Conflict:
- in areas with too high populations resulting in anomie preventing criminal network developing
- only illegitimate opportunity is in gangs
- violence is release for frustration and alternative source of status
Retreatist:
- unable to succeed in legitimate and illegitimate structures
- turn to retreatist subcultures usually based on drug use
evaluation of Cloward and Ohlin - 3 types of subcultures
- ignores crime of the wealthy and overestimates WC crime - doesn’t tackle issues related to gender or class - don’t question why WC struggle to succeed in legitimate structures
+ explanation for different TYPES of WC crime through subcultures
Miller - focal concerns
- subcultures don’t arise from inability to achieve success
- WC have different set of values (focal concerns): excitement, toughness, smartness, autonomy, fate
- focal concerns lead to crime and deviance in order to achieve status
- excitement - non-utilitarian crime
- autonomy - take matters into own hands rather than getting help from police etc
- fate - don’t consider consequences of actions as future already decided
evaluation of Miller - focal concerns
- generalises all WC people saying they’re bound to be gang members or delinquents
- WC having different norms and values contradicts functionalist view that everyone is socialised into value consensus
Matza - subterranean values and drift
- we all have delinquent values and criminal urges but we learn to keep them suppressed (young more likely to be criminal)
- we use neutralisation to justify crimes
- neutralisation techniques: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, appeal to higher loyalty (friends)
- the fact everyone uses attempts to neutralise their crimes shows everyone shares the same values otherwise they would believe their act was correct
- we drift between delinquency and conformity throughout life
evaluation of subterranean values and drift
- it is not easy to just ‘drift’ in and out of delinquent activity when there are consequences to the activities eg. prison, stigma
- not everyone attempts to neutralise or justify their crime, some show no remorse
- neutralisation techniques could be seen as excuses to avoid punishment rather than ‘drifting’ back into mainstream values
Carrabine - corporate crime
- we entrust high status professionals with our finances, health, security and personal info
- eg. GP Harold Shipman believed to have murdered over 200 patients by obtaining pethidine by forgery an deception and enough morphine to kill 360 people - only received a warning and continued to practise
ways that corporate crime is invisible
- little media coverage
- lack of political will - more interested in street crime
- crimes are complex
- de-labelling - offences labelled as civil not criminal, penalites are fines not jail
- under-reporting
classical marxist view on crime
- capitalism is criminogenic - corporate crime is inevitable because capitalism is based on greed
- whole system based on explotation of WC by RC - RC only get richer and WC increasing poverty
- not surprising that those who can’t afford basic necessities turn to crime
- non-utilitarian crimes explained by expressing frustration at their explotation
evaluation of marxist view on crime
- presents WC criminals as passive - puppets who can’t help but commit crime because of economic circumstances
- crime still exists in communist societies eg. Soviet Union in 20th century
reasons white collar crime is ‘invisible’ and justified
- often victimless
- company can afford to replace anything stolen
- lack of awareness
- institutional protection - company doesn’t want to look bad so won’t take case to court
example of a famous white collar crime in US
Enron
- energy supply company that made orders appear as profit before any money had actually been exchanged
- makes the company appear wealthier so people invest in it thinking the company was more successful than they were
- a prominent figure in the company was friends with George Bush and got him to refuse to investigate (deregulation)
Pearce - marxist view on corporate crime
- even laws that appear to help the working class really help the bourgeoisie
- eg. health and safety laws provide the ruling class with a healthy workforce to make more money off of
Chambliss - marxist view on crime
- most laws in US and UK protect people who own property
- did a study in Seattle and argued ruling class were part of a crime syndicate and used their wealth and status to bribe officials and avoid punishment
- he said the criminal justice system wasn’t there to catch the ruling class and was selectively applied to the working class
evaluation of Chambliss’s view on corporate crime
- there are some laws that protect working class eg. minimum wage
- powerful people do get criticised legally eg. Katie price tax evasions, Trump
- most people in contemporary society own property so doesn’t specifically protect RC
Graham - marxist view on crime
- investigated how government policed illegal trade of drugs, amphetamines in particular
- Even though there was a ‘war on drugs’, politicians decided not to restrict amphetamine production and distribution because most was made and sold by pharmaceutical companies - making profit for bourgeoisie
Hall - neo-marxist view on corporate crime
- there was a ‘crisis of capitalism’ and the resulting unemployment had a disproportionate impact of black people, some chose to enter the informal economy which sometimes involved crime
- this created a moral panic about black WC crime, taking attention away from crime committed by the ruling class
Taylor and Young ‘Fully social theory’
anti-deterministic, more volunteristic
When considering a deviant act marxists should consider:
1- structural origins
2- immediate cause of crime
3- the act itself and reason behind it
4- immediate social reaction to act
5- wider origins of social reaction
6- outcome of social reaction
evaluation of Taylor, Walton and Young’s fully social theory
- Rock (realist) - romanticises criminals into ‘Robin Hood figures’ when not all crime is politically motivated
- feminists - focuses only on male crime
- most crime committed by WC is against WC not RC
Young - left realism causes of crime
Crime is deep rooted in social conditions
Rise in living standards since WW2 has meant a rise in crime rate.
- relative deprivation - social media allows everyone access to messages of material wealth which is not attainable by most so people feel deprived in comparison
- subculture - a group’s solution to relative deprivation, want society’s goals but achieve them by illegitimate means
- marginalisation - powerless groups in society such as unemployed youths use violence and rioting as political action
left realism - solutions to crime
- police becoming more accountable to local communities and involve them in deciding policies and priorities
- crime control should involve a multi-agency approach involving schools and social services
- police shouldn’t have allowed their relationship with the public to break down
- reduce social inequalities
evaluation of left realist view on crime
- overlook importance of crimes of the powerful (corporate crime) and focus too much of inner-city crime making the problem appear worse
- deterministic - not all individuals who experience relative deprivation commit crime
- relies on quantitative data from official stats and victim surveys - not true picture and no in depth explanation
Matthews and Young - square of crime (left-realist)
4 methods to explain crime:
1. state and agencies - decide if an act is a crime and how to enforce it
2. offender and their actions - the crime they committed and why
3. informal social control - public react to crime in different ways
4. victim - decide whether to report a crime
Importance of different elements varies from crime to crime eg. corporate crime has different victim-offender relationship and is regulated differently by agencies of social control
Wilson and Herrnstein - right realist view on causes of crime
- Biosocial theory - some people have a more aggressive, risk-taking personality caused by biological differences
- This makes these certain people more likely to commit crime
Murray - right realist view o causes of crime
- New Victorians - those who are respectable, seek employment and are happy to be responsible marital parents
- New Rabble - form an increasing underclass and have distinct criminal tendencies and values falling outside wider held values
- single parents, dropping out of education/employment/family are major concern
- development of underclass is related to increases in crime
- communities become fragmented as response to crime is to withdraw into home - loss of informal social control
Wilson and Kelling - broken window theory
- communities should be prevented from deteriorating
- if a window is broken, rowdiness on the street will go unchallenged and problems will grow
- increase in vandalism and youths hanging around means law-abiding citizens are reluctant to come out
- if communities see measures are made to enforce law they’re more likely to report a crime
- resources will be wasted on those areas which have gone too far, they’re unable to be restored
Clarke - right realist rational choice theory
- crime is a choice
- most criminals are rational actors, if risk of getting caught is low or punishment isn’t severe they’re more likely to commit the crime
- they are rational in that they weigh up costs and benefits to assess whether a crime is worth committing
right realist view on solutions of crime
- Etzioni - communitarianism - building up a community of law-abiding citizens to make crime less likely
- Wilson - police should carry out ‘order maintenance’ rather than law enforcement - reduce the likelihood of them committing the crime low in the first place eg. repairing broken windows
- zero tolerance
- tough sentences
Matthews - criticism of right realist view on crime
- little evidence to support that broken windows actually lead to more crime
- incivility determined by crime not other way around
Jones - criticism of right realist view on crime
- decline in communities more likely related to lack of investment than the underclass