Crime and Deviance Flashcards
Define Crime
Actions / Behaviours that break the formal, written rules in society (laws).
Define Deviance
Behaviour that doesn’t conform to a society’s consensus norms and expectations (“unwritten rules”).
Newburn (2007)
Crime is a social construct
Downes and Rock (2007)
Ambiguity is a key feature of rule breaking.
Context also applies - something may be deviant within one group but not deviant within another.
Factors that affect deviance
- non-deviant crime
- time (historically)
- the society or culture
- the social group
- place or context
Functionalists on crime and deviance
the source of crime and deviance is located in the structure of society.
the agencies of social control protect the value consensus by controlling the threat of crime and deviance.
Durkheim
Crime in inevitable and is a normal part of society
Durkheim’s functions of crime
Boundary maintenance
Adaptation and change
Safety valve
Warning device
Erikson (1966)
society purposefully promotes crime in order to keep a healthy balance of crime.
agencies of control (such as the police) aim to maintain the levels.
Evaluations of Durkheim
- does not state how much crime is the “optimum amount”
- doesn’t explain motivation
- doesn’t look individually at crime and its effects on individuals
- crime does not always lead to solidarity and can sometimes have the opposite effect
- does not explain violent crimes such as rape or murder
Merton (1968)
Crime and deviance is caused by strain and anomie
Define status frustration
Where people feel motivated to break societies rules because it feels impossible to be successful within their limits.
Merton: strain theory
- conformity
- innovation
- ritualism
- retreatism
- rebellion
Subcultural theories
- aimed to build off of Merton’s work
- focused on the position of groups in the social structure rather than just individuals.
- they tend to deal with working class, juvenile delinquency
Cohen (1970)
- working class youth believe in the success goals of the mainstream but by not having the means they are denied status
- this leads to the formation of new values or a “delinquent subculture”
- receive gratification / status through these acts within their subculture
Cloward and Ohlin
argue that cohen’s theory does not allow for the diversity of responses found among the working class youth
- criminal subcultures
- conflict subcultures
- retreatist subcultures
Criminal subcultures
commit utilitarian crimes to get money or status
Conflict subcultures
commit aggressive crimes targeted at those who are seen to represent their oppression
Retreatist subcultures
failed in “normal” society and have also been rejected by other subcultures - they become deviants and suffer
Evaluations of Merton
- most people who face strain and anomie don’t commit crime
- focuses too much on individual responses and doesn’t recognise the social pattern of crime and deviance
- fails to recognise that there are apparently conforming and successful people who commit crime (e.g. white collar crime)
Evaluations of Cohen
- it helps to explain working class delinquency as a group response
- makes the assumption that young, working class delinquents accept mainstream values as superior and desirable
Evaluations of Cloward and Ohlin
- this research is helpful as it gives insight into why working class delinquency may take different forms in different circumstances
- criticised for exaggerating the differences between the three types of subcultures as there is often an overlap between them