Court Cases Flashcards

0
Q

Civil rights

A

Right to equal treatment under the law; these specify what the govt must do to ensure equal protecting of the law and freedom from discrimination (14 amend) equal protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Civil liberties

A

Personal freedoms that govt may not take away from you without due process of law (14 amendment) limitation on govt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

14th amendment

A

No state can limit privelages of the citizen of the United States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Selective incorporation

A

Refers to which the SCOTUS gradually applied the freedoms protected by the bill of rights against state governments by way of 14th amendment due process clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Establishment clause

A

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lemon vs kurtzman (1971)

A

Created lemon test to determine wether state aid to religious school violates the establishment clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lemon test

A

Secular purpose
Neither inhibit or advance religion
Avoid excessive entanglement between church and state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Engel vs vitals (1962)

A

Government official have no business for composing official prayers for any group
No state mandate prayer in public schools to be unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Epperson vs arkansas (1968)

A

Struck down an ar statue making it illegal for teacher in a state-sponsored institution to teach the theory of evolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Edwards v aquillard (1987)

A

Struck down a LA statue mandating balanced treatment of “creation science” and “evolution science” in public school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The free exercise clause

A

“Prohibiting the free exercise there of”

Belief cannot be outlaw, but conduct an be limited if it involves with other laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reynolds vs us (1878)

A

The Morrill anti-bigamy act (1862) banned bigamy in the United States; targeted the Mormons practice of plural marriage
Not allowed to practice polygamy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Oregon vs smith (1990)

Employment division vs smith

A

Could deny unemployment benefit for violating states prohibition of use peyote even though drug was used for religious purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pure speech

A

Relies only on the power of words to convey message/meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Symbolic speech “expressive conduct”

A

Using actions and symbols in addition to or instead of spoken words to express opinion
May be restricted by government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tinker v Des Moines (1969)

A

The first amendment protects the right to wear black armbands in high school to protest the Vietnam war

16
Q

Texas v Johnson (1989)

A

Flag burning is protected as symbolic speech

17
Q

Seditious speech

A

Urges resistance to lawful authority/ advocates overthrow of the government

18
Q

Clear and present danger test

A

Speech that presents an danger it is unprotected

19
Q

Bad tendency doctrine

A

Speech could be restricted even if it had only a tendency to legal action

20
Q

Preferred position doctrine

Gitlow vs New york

A

1st amendment freedoms are more fundamental than other freedoms because they provide the basis for all other liberties thus, any law limiting these freedoms are unconstitutional unless govt can prove other wise- strict scrutiny

21
Q

Slander

A

Spoken defamation

22
Q

Libel

A

Written defamation

23
Q

Bethel SD v Fraiser (1986)

A

Student may be suspended for lewd or indecent speech at school events, through this would be protected outside the school setting

24
Q

Hazel wood SD v kuhlmeier (1998)

A

School officials have sweeping authority to regulate student speech in school sponsored newspaper theater production etc.

25
Q

Prior restraint

A

Censorship of information before it is published

Has repeatedly been limited by SCOTUS, not allowed by courts

26
Q

Miller v California (1973)

A
When is material obscene (LAPS test)
Violates community standards 
Appeals to arouse people 
Shows sexual conduct 
Lacks serious serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific
27
Q

Griswold v Connecticut (1965)

A

Struck down state law forbidding use of contraceptives

Various portions of bill of rights don’t protect rights to privacy

28
Q

Roe v wade (1973)

A

Divided a pregnancy into 3 trimesters based upon the viability of the embryo/fetus at each state, as do medical personnel

29
Q

4th amendment

A

Unreasonable searches and seizures

30
Q

Te exclusionary rule

A

Prevents police from using illegal attained evidence against you

31
Q

Mapp v Ohio (1961)

A

Incorporated the exclusionary rule against the states