core studies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

studies in the social approach

A

milgram 1963, bocchiaro 2012, pillavin 1969, levine 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

studies in the cognitive approach

A

loftus and palmer 1974, grant 1998, moray 1959, simons and chabris 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

studies in the developmental approach

A

bandura 1961, chaney 2004, kohlberg 1968, lee 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

studies in the individual differences approach

A

freud 1909, baron-cohen 1997, gould 1982, hancock 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

studies in the biological approach

A

sperry 1968, casey 2011, blakemore and cooper 1970, maguire 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

milgram and bocchiaro

A

responses to people in authority; obedience, disobedience and whistleblowing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

pillavin and levine

A

responses to people in need; subway samaritan, cross-cultural altruism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

loftus and palmer and grant

A

memory; eyewitness testimony, context-dependent memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

moray and simons and chabris

A

attention; auditory attention, visual inattention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

bandura and chaney

A

external influences on children’s behaviour; transmission of aggression, funhaler

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

kohlberg and lee

A

moral development; moral stages of development, evaluations of lying and truth-telling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

freud and baron-cohen

A

understanding disorders; little hans, theory of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

gould and hancock

A

measuring differences; bias in IQ testing, the language of psychopaths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sperry and casey

A

regions of the brain; split-brain study, neural correlates of delay and gratification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

blakemore and cooper and maguire

A

brain plasticity; impact of early visual experience, taxi drivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

studies in the behaviourist perspective

A

bandura 1961, chaney 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

studies in the psychodynamic perspective

A

freud 1909, kohlberg 1968, hancock 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

milgram 1963

A

studied obedience in a lab setting. his volunteer sample of 40 men were asked to give increasing electric shocks to a stranger in a ‘lab experiment’. they were unaware that the ‘learner’ was a confederate and that the shocks were fake. 65% of participants reached the highest 450V level. anyone can be obedient to authority and that the tension witnessed was due to the conflict between the desire to obey and the desire not to hurt another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

bocchiaro 2011

A

looked at whistleblowing using 149 students and a comparison group of 138. they were individually greeted by a stern researcher and asked to endorse an ethically unsound study to their friends. 76% did as asked and only 9% were whistleblowers. the comparison group said that most would not comply. behaving morally against authority is hard even when it seems easy, and people are not good at predicting behaviour. individual characteristics seem to have little effect on the situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

pillavin 1969

A

investigated a situational explanation of bystander behaviour. he looked at the race and state of the victim and number of bystanders. field study that took place on the new york subway and staged a fake emergency involving a drunk or ill victim who was black or white that staggered forward and collapsed. more help was given to the ill victim. failed to find diffusion of responsibility, but concluded that bystander behaviour is linked to arousal-cost-reward model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

levine 2001

A

looked at whether helping varies across different cultures. conducted studies in 23 cities across the world. three non-emergency situations- a dropped pen, someone with a bad leg dropping magazines and a blind man crossing the road. helping rates in each city were stable across the three measures. huge cross cultural differences- 93% in rio to 44% in new york. simpatico cultures helped more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

loftus and palmer 1974

A

wanted to see if words affect memory recall. two studies using video clips of car crashes on groups of 45 and 150 students. participants were asked a question with a critical verb and then the effect on estimate of speed or recall of broken glass was measured. information making up memory is received during and after an event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

grant 1998

A

studied context-dependent memory using recall and recognition. 40 participants wearing headphones read an article in noisy or quiet conditions. found context-dependency effects because they performed better in matching conditions. context clues are important in retrieving newly-learned, meaningful information. students who study in silence may perform better in exams.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

moray 1959

A

moray conducted three lab experiments into dichotic listening. in the first a list of 35 words was read to one ear whilst a participants shadowed a message from their other ear. after 30 seconds they were asked to recall the list but could not. in the second experiment they were instructed in the non-attended message to change ear. some participants had their name called in the instruction- and these paid more attention. the third experiment had numbers in the messages- some participants were asked to remember the numbers and others just the content- but there was no significant difference in the numbers recalled. only subjectively important messages can penetrate the attentional block.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

simons and chabris 1999

A

studied visual attention and perception. 228 participants in an independent measures design lab experiment. they watched one of four 75 second tapes and were asked to count how many times the basketball players passed a ball. after 45 seconds either an umbrella woman or gorilla walked across the screen- 46% failed to notice the unexpected event. shows inattentional blindness as we may fail to notice certain aspects of the environment if we are focusing on another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

bandura 1961

A

wanted to investigate social learning theory and the imitation of aggression. studied 72 children in four groups. they saw either an aggressive or non-aggressive model who was the same or opposite sex to them play with a bobo doll. there was a control group. children in the aggressive condition produced more imitative aggression and there was a tendency for same-sex imitation. supports social learning theory as children imitate the behaviour of role models.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

chaney 2004

A

compared adherence to asthma medication using either a traditional spacer or a funhaler. pilot study which involved questionnaires to parents of 32 asthmatic children, one at the beginning of the study and another two weeks after using the funhaler. it had a whistle and spinning disk to reinforce correct use. parents reported more success with the funhaler- 22/30 compared to 3/30. children’s willingness to cooperate improved. novelty and reward can improve adherence, and operant conditioning can be useful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

kohlberg 1968

A

looked at moral reasoning by studying 75 boys from chicago over 12 years. he also studied boys in britain, canada, taiwan, mexico and turkey. they were presented with hypothetical moral dilemmas. he found three levels and six stages of moral reasoning- preconventional, conventional and post-conventional. not everyone achieves all stages.

29
Q

lee 1997

A

wanted to compare how lying and truth telling are regarded in pro and anti-social situations across cultures. chinese and canadian children aged seven, nine and eleven were given four stories. two stories had intentional good deeds and two had intentional bad deeds where characters told the truth or lied when questioned. children were then asked to evaluate the deeds. chinese children rated lying more positively in pro-social situations- suggesting emphasis on modesty can override lying. both sets of children rated truth telling positively and lying negatively in anti-social situations. there is a close relationship between sociocultural practice and moral judgement.

30
Q

freud 1909

A

studied a phobia of white horses in a five-year-old boy called little hans. he received letters from hans’ father and replied with his interpretations. He concluded that hans’ phobia was caused by the oedipus complex- a strong unconscious sexual desire for his mother. once hans identified with his father and took on his morals- he resolved the oedipus complex and his phobia disappeared. freud said this was evidence for his theory of psychosexual development.

31
Q

baron-cohen 1997

A

investigated theory of mind and autism. three groups- autistic, ‘normal’ and tourettes completed the eyes task in a lab experiment where they had to judge emotion from black and white photographs of eyes. they also completed other tasks to measure their ability to recognise emotion and establish concurrent validity. the study found that those in the autistic group lacked theory of mind skills.

32
Q

gould 1982

A

reviewed and challenged the validity of the yerkes IQ tests, which were used to test army recruits during WWI and affected immigration law. three types of tests- army alpha for literate recruits, army beta for illiterate recruits and an individual exam for those who failed both. results found that white americans adults had an average mental age of 13, russian immigrants 11.34 and black americans 10.34. inherent cultural biases in the tests and there were logistical difficulties giving them. systematic bias lowered the scores of black people and immigrants, therefore IQ is political, rather than biological.

33
Q

hancock 2011

A

statistically analysed the way psychopaths speak about their crimes. used two text analysis tools to look at narratives from 14 psychopathic and 38 non-psychopathic murderers. psychopaths included more rational cause and effect descriptors and focused on material needs rather than social needs. their speech had more disfluencies which suggests difficulty in describing powerful emotional events. they used more past tense than present tense verbs- suggesting detachment from the incident- and used less emotional language.

34
Q

what is the social approach?

A

behaviour is caused by interactions with individuals and groups. different types of social interaction influence daily behaviour- prejudice, attraction, conformity, obedience, minority/majority influence.

35
Q

what is the cognitive approach?

A

behaviour is the result of mental processes, which are similar to a computer process- input, conversion, output.
soft deterministic approach, as behaviour is caused by mental process, but there is a limited choice in the information they had before the behaviour.

36
Q

what is the developmental approach?

A

behaviour changes over time because cognitive, social, and physiological abilities change. changes fastest during childhood, which has a long term effect on behaviour.
more holistic because it focuses on multiple developmental causes of behaviour.

37
Q

what is the individual differences approach?

A

looks at differences between individuals, not what we have in common. focus on difference in personality, normality, and abnormality. categorise and measure differences, e.g., introvert-extrovert, IQ tests.

38
Q

what is the biological approach?

A

behaviour is dispositional not situational- internal factors, not external. brain and genetics are key factors, and brain abnormalities can cause deviant behaviour. human body is a complex machine and hormones- serotonin, genes, and CNS all interact to cause behaviour.

39
Q

what is the psychodynamic perspective?

A

unconscious processes have important influences on behaviour. psychodynamic conflict- different parts of the mind are in constant dynamic struggle with each other, and consequences of this help us understand behaviour.
behaviour motivated by sex and aggression. personality is particularly shaped during childhood.

40
Q

what is the behaviourist perspective?

A

all behaviour is learned, we are born a blank slate. learning occurs through life experiences- classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and social learning. learning through association, learning through consequence, and learning through imitation.

41
Q

sperry 1968

A

investigating the function of independent hemispheres in patients who had their corpus callosum severed to treat severe epilepsy. devised a test to isolate the visual field and hand controlled by each hemisphere. left hemisphere has language capabilities whereas the right hemisphere can understand language, but not communicate with words. concluded that patients had ‘two minds in one body’.

42
Q

casey 2011

A

delayed gratification using 60 individuals in their mid-forties that completed the marshmallow test as a child- and either resisted, or gave in. completed a hot and cold go/no-go task using faces. children with low self control showed this as adults, and vice versa. 26 participants did a go/no-go task in a brain scanner. low delayers had lower activity in the right, inferior frontal gyrus (delays responses) in no-go trials. ventral striatum (immediate reward) showed more activity in happy no-go trials for low delayers. neurological basis for differences in people’s ability to show self-control and delay gratification.

43
Q

blakemore and cooper 1970

A

kept kittens in the dark from birth- and at the age of two weeks were put in a special apparatus looking at either vertical or horizontal stripes for five hours a day. at five months old they were tested and unable to see the orientation that they had not experiences. by studying the neurons from two cats that experienced different orientations it revealed an abnormal distribution of the preferred orientation. visual experience had modified their brains, with profound perceptual consequences.

44
Q

maguire 2000

A

studied navigational ability in london cabbies. a sample of 16 healthy right-handed male taxi drivers were given brain scans, which were compared with 50 scans from the MRI database of similar men that were not taxi drivers. the posterior hippocampus had greater volume in the taxi drivers and the anterior hippocampus had greater grey matter volume in non-taxi drivers. positive correlation between the time a taxi driver had been qualified and the grey matter volume. suggests the idea of brain plasticity which can be altered by experience.

45
Q

strengths of milgram’s study

A

qualitative and quantitative data provides comparison and depth; can be compared/highly replicable; male age range represents soldiers so is generalisable to the aim of the study; high levels of face validity

46
Q

weaknesses of milgram’s study

A

low ecological validity as lab experiment creates an unrealistic environment; extremely unethical through harm to participants; self-selected means higher chance for demand characteristics which is unrepresentative

47
Q

strengths of bocchiaro’s study

A

comparison group improved its reliability; demand characteristics removed to increase validity; qualitative and quantitative provides comparison and explanation; large sample allows consistent findings

48
Q

weaknesses of bocchiaro’s study

A

undergraduates and women may be more likely to obey which reduces validity; lack of consequence reduces validity; self-selected sample may feel more obligated to the research and be more obedient, so unrepresentative

49
Q

strengths of loftus and palmer’s study

A

isolation of key variables increases validity; reliability and random allocation improve validity by reducing participant variables; quantitative can be easily summarised;, ethical concealment reduces demand characteristics

50
Q

weaknesses of loftus and palmer’s study

A

lacks ecological validity through lack of real life emotions; unrepresentative sample has low generalisability; quantitative gives no depth; leading question may affect memory

51
Q

strengths of grant’s study

A

reduced situational variables; random allocation; quantitative can be easily summarised and compared; high validity and reliability as a controlled lab experiment; ecological validity through learning material in classroom

52
Q

weaknesses of grant’s study

A

ungeneralisable sample; lab experiment lacks ecological validity; quantitative gives no depth; individual measures design increases participant variables; unrepresentative of exams by learning only minutes prior; opportunity sample creates bias which limits generalisability

53
Q

strengths of bandura’s study

A

inter-rater reliability; qualitative enhances understanding of children’s behaviour; controlled extraneous variables such as putting toys in same order ensures validity

54
Q

weaknesses of bandura’s study

A

no informed consent; bobo doll would only be used in an aggressive context; lacked ecological validity through unnatural environment; limited representativeness

55
Q

strengths of chaney’s study

A

informed consent from self report; repeated measures controls participant variables; quantitative allows easy comparisons and analysis; high ecological validity; reliability through standardised questionnaire

56
Q

weaknesses of chaney’s study

A

difficult to operationalise due to semantics; parents could have demand characteristics; repeated measures was undermined by lack of counterbalancing; social desirability bias; extraneous variables reduces research validity

57
Q

strengths of freud’s study

A

qualitative data provides research and comparison

58
Q

weaknesses of freud’s study

A

his only case study of a child; social desirability bias; demand characteristics; leading questions

59
Q

strengths of baron-cohen’s study

A

two control groups ensures validity; quantitative allows comparison; participants matched for mean age/intelligence increases validity; concurrent validity from happes strange stories; control for order effects;

60
Q

weaknesses of baron-cohen’s study

A

lacks ecological validity through static images; extraneous variables through lack of standardised location; unclear ethics regarding debrief and harm

61
Q

strengths of sperry’s study

A

controlled conditions ensures validity; qualitative allows description of function/difficulty; not ethnocentric through biological explanation

62
Q

weaknesses of sperry’s study

A

lack of quantitative makes it hard to scientifically analyse; extremely small sample lacks generalisability; low ecological validity

63
Q

strengths of casey’s study

A

strict control on extraneous variables allows high validity; longitudinal study allows for a stable conclusion; quantitative data allows comparison/summary/statistical analysis/replicability;

64
Q

weaknesses of casey’s study

A

MRI and go/no-go task lack ecological validity, lacks reliability through longitudinal study not being time or cost effective to replicate; reduced sample size over time loses generalisability

65
Q

strengths of piliavin’s study

A

quantitative and qualitative allows comparison and explanation; well controlled for a field experiment such as standardised timing, place and appearance of collapsing; ecological validity; reliability from 103 trials; sample of 4,450 establishes reliability

66
Q

weaknesses of piliavin’s study

A

unethical through deception, lack of consent, harm; extraneous variables such as the typical carriage being full could affect responses to the emergency; time of study could make sample unrepresentative; ethnocentric from only showing american people’s response

67
Q

strengths of levine’s study

A

quantitative data allows comparison; highly standardised procedures ensures reliability; three different measures adds to the reliability of findings; large number of trials ensures consistent data findings; cross-cultural study

68
Q

weaknesses of levine’s study

A

correlational study does not allow them to establish cause and effect; lack of qualitative does not explain motives behind behaviour; lack of consent/deception; lack of validity due to chance for demand characteristics; large sample makes it difficult to assess standardisation; ethnocentric from imbalance of continents