Core Knowledge Theory Flashcards
Core Knowledge theory
- existence of core concepts
- built-in or innate (not blank slate)
concepts
- essential things we know about [blank]
- used to group together objects (or events, qualities, or abstractions) that are similar in some way
why do we need concepts/categories?
- simplify world
- reasoning and inference
Nativism
- there are innate concepts
- core domains = simple, starter (innate) concepts
empiricims
- there are not innate concepts
- concepts are learned with general learning mechanisms
core knowledge theory
- core concepts are built-in or innate
- nativism (ignore book’s term constructivism in this section)
- core domains/selected over evolution just like physical structures:
- physical objects (inanimates)
- number
- space
- living things (animates)
- language
theory-theory (wellman & gelman)
children have intuitive theories, each has an innate basis
Baillargeon’s landmark study
- violation of expectation/”looking time”
- perfected piaget’s idea of lack of mental representations
- object permanence with 4 month olds
inanimates: physical objects/ niave theory of physics
- spelke and colleagues: physical objects:
- move in continuous path (4 months)
- take up space/can’t pass through other objects (4 months)
- cannot move on their own (but animates can) (7 months)
- nativists argue yes beacuse reaching/grapsing experience is minimal and visual acuity low before this point
all innate?
- some time or experience required for full knowledge of gravity and support
- violation detected at 6.5 months
- before that age, the violation is not detected
Number
- infants (and some other primates) discriminate objects and events by small numerosity
- habituate to different arrangments of same number
- 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, but not 4-5 etc.
- “subitization”
- innate constraint
addition
- 5 months olds
- only up to 3+1 -> same innate constraint
post-infancy
- once again, these are “starter” concepts
- how do we get past this limit?
- and why don’t non-human animals?
- language: each numerosity has a name
- Piraha tribe of brazil: no number names and no counting or numerical reasoning beyond 3
What is a (fully developed) theory of mind
- knowing that others have intential actions
- emotions desires
- perceptions
- beliefs
- especially difficult when they are different from one’s own
Where does TOM begin?
- innate knowledge of human face
- newborns prefer faces to other complex stimuli
- preference for general facial configuration? “top” heavy”
- biological motion preferred over non-biological motion
- newborns imitate facial expressions
newborn imitation
from 2 days
intentions/goals
- reaching experiment (6 months) (woodward)
- vilation of expectation
- focusing on the intention of the hand
- if you reach for object that they want or expected the human hand to reach for
emotional understanding
- emotion contagion in newborns
- 3-4 months: discrimination of emotions
- 7 months: ERP evidence of discrimination of basic emotions
- understanding emotions when they differ from one’s own: social referencing (~10 months)
social referencing
use somebody eles’s reaction to gauge a socail situation
emotional contagion
automatic immitation of someone eles’s emotions (0-3 months olds)
Desires: how early, if different?
- bowl of goldfish crackers, bowl of raw broccoli
- babies/toddlers like goldfish, hate broccoli
- experimenter demonstrates her own likes (desires) and dislikes
- experimenter asks child to give her one
- two conditions: same desire (easy) vs. different desire (hard)
- results in “different desire” condition: 18 mo old gives broccoli and 14 mo give goldfish anyway
Perceptions
joint attention/gaze following (9-10 months)
Apple hiding experiment
- the child will always respond by hiding the apple behind their back or by hiding it on the side the experimentor hid from child
- adult response by hiding in it on their side of screen
Perceptions
- apple behind screen:
- fail at 2.5
- pass by 3
Beliefs: False belief Task
- false belief = different belief
- “Sally-Ann task”
- 3 yr olds = answer look in box
- 4 yr olds = answering correctly -> look in basket because that was the last place sally saw it
3 yr olds pass Sally-Ann Task if
- sally is in view the whole time, and
- they are prompted to put sally where she wants to go rather than ask where she would go (Rubio.-Fernandez Geurts)
Looking time studies: onishi & baillargeon
- 15 mo olds look longer when reach is inconsistent with person’s (false) belief