Core Knowledge Theory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Core Knowledge theory

A
  • existence of core concepts
  • built-in or innate (not blank slate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

concepts

A
  • essential things we know about [blank]
  • used to group together objects (or events, qualities, or abstractions) that are similar in some way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why do we need concepts/categories?

A
  • simplify world
  • reasoning and inference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nativism

A
  • there are innate concepts
  • core domains = simple, starter (innate) concepts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

empiricims

A
  • there are not innate concepts
  • concepts are learned with general learning mechanisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

core knowledge theory

A
  • core concepts are built-in or innate
  • nativism (ignore book’s term constructivism in this section)
  • core domains/selected over evolution just like physical structures:
  • physical objects (inanimates)
  • number
  • space
  • living things (animates)
  • language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

theory-theory (wellman & gelman)

A

children have intuitive theories, each has an innate basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Baillargeon’s landmark study

A
  • violation of expectation/”looking time”
  • perfected piaget’s idea of lack of mental representations
  • object permanence with 4 month olds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

inanimates: physical objects/ niave theory of physics

A
  • spelke and colleagues: physical objects:
  • move in continuous path (4 months)
  • take up space/can’t pass through other objects (4 months)
  • cannot move on their own (but animates can) (7 months)
  • nativists argue yes beacuse reaching/grapsing experience is minimal and visual acuity low before this point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

all innate?

A
  • some time or experience required for full knowledge of gravity and support
  • violation detected at 6.5 months
  • before that age, the violation is not detected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Number

A
  • infants (and some other primates) discriminate objects and events by small numerosity
  • habituate to different arrangments of same number
  • 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, but not 4-5 etc.
  • “subitization”
  • innate constraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

addition

A
  • 5 months olds
  • only up to 3+1 -> same innate constraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

post-infancy

A
  • once again, these are “starter” concepts
  • how do we get past this limit?
  • and why don’t non-human animals?
  • language: each numerosity has a name
  • Piraha tribe of brazil: no number names and no counting or numerical reasoning beyond 3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a (fully developed) theory of mind

A
  • knowing that others have intential actions
  • emotions desires
  • perceptions
  • beliefs
  • especially difficult when they are different from one’s own
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where does TOM begin?

A
  • innate knowledge of human face
  • newborns prefer faces to other complex stimuli
  • preference for general facial configuration? “top” heavy”
  • biological motion preferred over non-biological motion
  • newborns imitate facial expressions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

newborn imitation

A

from 2 days

17
Q

intentions/goals

A
  • reaching experiment (6 months) (woodward)
  • vilation of expectation
  • focusing on the intention of the hand
  • if you reach for object that they want or expected the human hand to reach for
18
Q

emotional understanding

A
  • emotion contagion in newborns
  • 3-4 months: discrimination of emotions
  • 7 months: ERP evidence of discrimination of basic emotions
  • understanding emotions when they differ from one’s own: social referencing (~10 months)
19
Q

social referencing

A

use somebody eles’s reaction to gauge a socail situation

20
Q

emotional contagion

A

automatic immitation of someone eles’s emotions (0-3 months olds)

21
Q

Desires: how early, if different?

A
  • bowl of goldfish crackers, bowl of raw broccoli
  • babies/toddlers like goldfish, hate broccoli
  • experimenter demonstrates her own likes (desires) and dislikes
  • experimenter asks child to give her one
  • two conditions: same desire (easy) vs. different desire (hard)
  • results in “different desire” condition: 18 mo old gives broccoli and 14 mo give goldfish anyway
22
Q

Perceptions

A

joint attention/gaze following (9-10 months)

23
Q

Apple hiding experiment

A
  • the child will always respond by hiding the apple behind their back or by hiding it on the side the experimentor hid from child
  • adult response by hiding in it on their side of screen
24
Q
A
25
Q

Perceptions

A
  • apple behind screen:
  • fail at 2.5
  • pass by 3
26
Q

Beliefs: False belief Task

A
  • false belief = different belief
  • “Sally-Ann task”
  • 3 yr olds = answer look in box
  • 4 yr olds = answering correctly -> look in basket because that was the last place sally saw it
27
Q

3 yr olds pass Sally-Ann Task if

A
  1. sally is in view the whole time, and
  2. they are prompted to put sally where she wants to go rather than ask where she would go (Rubio.-Fernandez Geurts)
28
Q

Looking time studies: onishi & baillargeon

A
  • 15 mo olds look longer when reach is inconsistent with person’s (false) belief