Contracts III--Consideration Flashcards

1
Q

What is Consideration?

A

The majority of agreements that qualify as legally enforceable contracts contain a bargainedfor change in legal position between the parties, i.e., valuable consideration.

While substitute doctrines may permit enforcement of an agreement, only the presence of valuable consideration on both sides of the bargain will make an executory bilateral contract fully enforceable from the moment of formation. Simply stated, consideration is the price for enforceability in the courts.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts> III Consideration

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What two elements are necessary to constitute consideration?

A

(1) there must be a bargainedfor exchange between the parties; and
(2) that which is bargained for must be considered of legal value or, as it is traditionally stated, it must constitute a benefit to the promisor or a detriment to the promisee. At the present time, the detriment element is emphasized in determining whether an exchange contains legal value

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts> III Consideration (B)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a bargained for exchnage?

A

This element of consideration requires that the promise induce the detriment and the detriment induce the promise.

Unless both of these elements are present, the ‘bargained-for exchange’ element of consideration is not present. If either of the parties intended to make a gift, he was not bargaining for consideration, and this requirement will not be met

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts> III Consideration (B)(1)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the general rule about

‘past’ or ‘moral’ consideration?

A

If something was already given or performed before the promise was made, it will not satisfy the ‘bargain’ requirement. The Courts reason that it was not given in exchange for the promise when made.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts > Consideration > Elements of
Consideration > ‘Past’ or ‘Moral Consideration >
-General Rule Not Sufficient Consideration
(3.B.1.c.1)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the debt barred by a

technical defense?

A

If a past obligation would be enforceable except for the fact that a technical defense to enforcement stands in the way (e.g. statute of limitations) the courts will enforce a new promise if it is in writing or has been partially performed. However the court will enforce the contract only to the extent of the new promise.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts > Consideration > Elements of
Consideration > ‘Past’ or ‘Moral Consideration >
Exceptions > Debt Barred by a Technical Defense
(3.B.1.c.2.a)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is an act or forbearance by
the Promisee enough to be
considered consideration?

A

The test is whether the act or forbearance by the promisee would be of any benefit to the promisor. In other words, if the promisor’s motive was to induce detriment, it will be treated as consideration.

Contracts III--Consideration
Contracts > Consideration > Elements of
Consideration > Bargained for Exchange >
Act or Forbearance by Promisee Must Be of 
Benefit to Promisor (3.B.1.a) 

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is economic benefit required ,for
an act of forbearance by the
Promisee, to be considered
sufficient consideration?

A

The benefit to the promisor need not have economic value.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts > Consideration > Elements of
Consideration > Bargained for Exchange >
Economic Benefit Not Required (3.B.1.b)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the elements of consideration?

A

There must be a bargained-for-exchange between the parties and legal value.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Legal Value (III.B.2)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is ‘adequacy of consideration’?

A

A sales is a contract in which title to GOODS passes from the sell to a buyer at a price [UCC 2-106(1)]

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Adequacy of Consideration (III.B.2.a)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is token consideration sufficient?

A

No, if the consideration is only token, it will usually not be legally sufficient. This is a gift rather than bargained-for consideration.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Adequacy of Consideration (III.B.2.a)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is ‘sham consideration’?

A

Parties to a written agreement often recite that it was made in consideration of $1 or some other insignificant sum. Frequently, this recited sum was not in fact paid and, indeed, it was never intended to be paid. Most courts hold that other evidence may be introduced to show that the consideration was not paid and no other consideration was given.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Adequacy of Consideration (III.B.2.a)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is ‘possibility of value’ in terms of consideration?

A

Where there is a possibility of value in the bargained-for act, adequacy of consideration will be found even though value never comes into existence.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Adequacy of Consideration (III.B.2.a)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Between the promisee and promisor, who receives legal detriment and who receives legal benefit?

A

There is legal detriment to Promisee and legal benefit to promisor

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration (III.B2b)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When does the promisee endure ‘legal detriment?’

A

Legal detriment will result if the promisee does something he is under no legal obligation to do or refrains from doing something that he has a legal right to do.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration (III.B2b1)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does the promisor receive ‘legal benefit?’

A

A legal beneift is a forbearance of performance of an act by the promisee which the promisor was not legally entitled to expect or demand, but which confers a benefit to the promisor

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration (III.B2b2)

x,x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is a preexisting legal duty to perform ‘consideraton?’

A

The promise to perform, or the performance of, an existing legal duty is not consideration.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration (III.B2c)

x,x

17
Q

How does ‘New or Different Consideration Promised’ affect the ‘Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration’ rule?

A

New or different consideration promised’ is an exception to the rule: If the promisee has given something in addition to what she already owes in return for the promise she now seeks to enforce, or has in some way agreed to vary her preexisting duty, such as by accelerating performance, there is consideration.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration (III.B2c1)

x,x

18
Q

How does ‘Voidable Obligation’ affect the ‘Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration’ rule?

A

Voidable Obligation’ is an exception to the rule: A promise to perform a voidable obligation (ratification) is enforceable despite the absence of new consideration.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration (III.B2c2)

x,x

19
Q

Does a promise to refrain from suing on a valid claim sufficient consideration?

What if the claim is invalid but the claimant reasonably and in good faith believed the claim to be valid?

A

Yes. The promise to refrain from suing on a claim may constitute consideration. If the claim is VALID, the forbearance to sue is, of course, sufficient consideration.

If the claim is INVALID in law or in fact, if the claimant reasonably and in good faith believes his claim to be valid, forbearance of the legal right to have his claim adjudicated constitutes detriment and consideration. BUT if the claimant is aware the claim is invalid, he has no such right; his suit is no more than the wrongful exercise of a power.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Forbearance to Sue as Consideration (III.B.2.d)

x,x

20
Q

Can a modified agreement as to the scope of a legal duty that is the of an honest dispute constitute consideration?

A

Yes. The compromise by each party is a detriment. If the scope of the legal duty owed is the of honest dispute, then a modifying agreement relating to it will ordinarily be given effect.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Honest Dispute as to Duty Exception to Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration (III.B.2.c.4)

x,x

21
Q

Under the UCC, when are contract modifications enforceable without consideration?

A

When they are sought in good faith.A good faith modification is based on a legitimate commercial reason outside the control of the party seeking the modification. Modifications extorted from the other party are in bad faith and are unenforceable.

At common law, a contract modification generally is unenforceable unless it is supported by new consideration.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Modification of Contract for the Sale of Goods Exception to Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration (III.B.2.c.6)

x,x

22
Q

Does a new promise constitute consideration when a preexisting duty is owed to a third party?

A

Yes. Traditionally, when a preexisting duty was owed to a third party, courts held that the new promise did not constitute consideration. However, the modern view adopted by the Second Restatement and the majority of jurisdictions states that the new promise constitutes consideration.

Example: Saul Pimon contracts with Pam Promotor to sing at a concert in New York for $25,000. Later, when Pimon threatens to cancel, Dud Dooright, a Pimon fan, offers to pay Pimon an additional $5,000 if he sings at the concert. Pimon appears and sings as agreed. Under
the traditional view, Pimon cannot enforce Dooright’s promise to pay the additional $5,000, but under the majority view Pimon can enforce the promise because Pimon did not owe a duty to Dooright under the original contract.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Preexisting Duty Owed to a Third Party Exception to Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration (III.B.2.c.3)

x,x

23
Q

For an existing debt, would payment of a smaller sum than the amount due be sufficient consideration for a promise by the creditor to discharge the debt?

A

No. One of the recurring problems in the preexisting duty area concerns promises regarding existing debts. When the amount due is undisputed, payment of a smaller sum than due will not be sufficient consideration for a promise by the creditor to discharge the debt. Neither a legal detriment nor a benefit would be present.

But again, bear in mind that courts will attempt to avoid this result by application of the above exceptions. Thus, for example, if the consideration is in any way new or different (e.g., payment before maturity or to one other than the creditor; payment in a different medium, e.g., stock instead of cash; or payment of a debt that is to an honest dispute), then sufficient consideration may be found.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration: Existing Debts (III.B.2.c.7)

x,x

24
Q

What level must an unforeseen difficulty reach in order to be an exception to the preexisting legal duty rule?

A

The unforeseen duty must rise to the level of impracticability, such that the duty of performance would be discharged, most states will hold that the unforeseen difficulty is an exception to the preexisting legal duty rule.

A promise modifying a contract that has not been fully performed on either side is binding without consideration if the modification is fair and equitable in view of circumstances not anticipated when the contract was made. Under the majority view, however, mere unforeseen difficulty in performing is not a substitute for consideration.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Unforeseen Circumstances Exception to Preexisting Legal Duty Not Consideration (III.B.2.c.5)

x,x

25
Q

What is an illusory promise?

A

A promise that lacks consideration and mutuality on at least one side and therefore is not binding.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.)

x,x

26
Q

Do requirement and output contracts have sufficient consideration?

A

Yes, consideration exists, as the promisor is suffering a legal detriment; he has parted with the
legal right to buy (or sell) the goods he may need (or manufacture) from (or to) another
source. [UCC §2-306

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.1)

x,x

27
Q

What are ‘conditional promises’?

A

A promise made by a party that will only take effect if another condition is met.

Conditional Promises are enforceable, no matter how remote the contingency, unless the ‘condition’ is entirely within the promisor’s control.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.2)

x,x

28
Q

What is a ‘promise conditioned on satisfaction?’

A

A promise conditioned on the promisor’s satisfaction.

The promise is not illusory because the promisor is constrained by good faith (for contracts involving personal taste) and a reasonable person standard (for contracts involving mechanical fitness, utility, or marketability)

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.2a)

x,x

29
Q

Are promises with the right to cancel or withdraw illusory?

A

Although reservation of an unqualified right to cancel or withdraw at any time may be an illusory promise, the consideration is valid if this right is in any way restricted, e.g., the right to cancel upon 60 days’ notice.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.3)

x,x

30
Q

Are one-sided exclusive agreements illusory?

A

No, the court may find an implied promise furnishing mutuality in appropriate circumstances.

The courts generally will find an implied promise to use best efforts and sustain agreements that might otherwise appear illusory

Example: Y Corp. was granted exclusive rights to sell Dominick’s dresses in return for
one-half the profit. The agreement was silent as to any obligation on the part
of Y Corp. Held: Y Corp. impliedly promised to use its best efforts to sell
Dominick’s dresses. [See UCC §2-306(2)]

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.4)

x,x

31
Q

Do voidable promises have mutuality?

A

Voidable promises are not held objectionable on ‘mutuality’ grounds. [Restatement (Second) of Contracts §78.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration> Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.5)

x,x

32
Q

What is a unilateral/option contract?

A

Unilateral contracts, enforceable because one has begun performance, or option contracts, enforceable because one has purchased time to decide (e.g., whether to purchase land), are not held objectionable on ‘mutuality’ grounds.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration>Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.6)

x,x

33
Q

What happens when surety makes promise before (or at the same time as) creditor performs or promises to perform?

A

If the gratuitous surety makes his promise to pay before (or at the same time as) the creditor performs or promises to perform, the creditor’s performance or promise will serve as consideration for surety’s promise, because the creditor has incurred a detriment in exchange for the surety’s promise.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration>Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.7.a)

x,x

34
Q

What happens when surety makes promise after creditor performs or promises to perform?

A

If the gratuitous surety does not make his promise until after the creditor has performed or made an absolute promise to perform, there is no consdieration to support the surety’s promise because of the preexisting legal duty rule - the creditor has not incurred any new detriment in exchange for the surety’s promise. Thus, the surety’s promise is unenforceable.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration>Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.7.b)

x,x

35
Q

Exception - obtaining suretys is condition precedent?

A

If the contract between the debtor and the creditor makes obtaining a surety a condition precedent to the creditor’s performance, so that the creditor would be justified in refusing to perform the contract until a surety is obtained, the surety’s promise is binding if the creditor performs in reliance on the surety’s promise.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration>Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.7.b1)

x,x

36
Q

Exception - additional consideration?

A

As with other contracts, if the creditor gives additional consideration in exchange for the surety’s promise, the surety will be bound.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration>Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.7.b2)

x,x

37
Q

What is a suretyship promise?

A

A suretyship contract involves a promise to pay the debt of another. A suretyship contract is not enforceable unless it is supported by consideration. If a surety is compensated, the requirement of consideration is not much of an issue, because the compensation will serve as consideration for the surety’s promise. If, however, the surety is gratuitous (i.e., the surety is not paid for his services), the consideration erquirement may cause problems. The timing becomes important in determining whether the adequate consideration is present in a gratuitous surety situation.

Contracts III–Consideration
Contracts>Consideration>Mutual and Illusory Promises (III.C.7)

x,x