Contracts Flashcards
Contracts choice of law
- Services or real estate: common law
- Goods: UCC
- Mixed: both if divisible, otherwise apply predominant purpose test
Offer requirements
- Commitment by the offeror: manifestation of present intent to be bound
-
Communication to a specific oferee
- Exception for reward offers
- c.f. advertisements, which are usually treated as an invitation to receive offers from the public
-
Definite and essential terms
- Common law: parties, subject matter, price, quantity
- UCC: quantity
Termination of an offer
-
Revocation by the offeror
- Express or constructive retraction
- Effective upon receipt by the offeree
-
Rejection by the offeree
- By words, conduct, or counteroffer
- Effective upon receipt by the offeror
- Lapse of time
-
Operation of law
- Death, destruction of the subject matter, supervening illegality
Methods of accepting an offer
-
For unilateral contracts
- By complete performance (offeree must be aware of and motivated by offer)
-
For bilateral contracts
- By return promise
- By beginning performance
Mirror image rule
At common law, any change in terms will be a rejection and counter offer
UCC acceptance by return promise
- Acceptance including a change in terms is valid unless agreement to the changed terms is made a condition of acceptance
- If not, terms are a proposal for change to the contract
- For merchants, new/different terms control unless:
- The original offer limited acceptance to its terms
- They materially alter the offer
- The offeror does not object within a reasonable time
- Knock-out rule applies
Knock-out rule
- When both parties are merchants: terms in a purported acceptance that conflict with original terms will knock one another out
- Court will replace with a reasonable gap-filling term
UCC acceptance by performance
- Shipment of conforming goods
- Shipment of non-conforming goods, unless buy is notified that the good were sent as an accommodation
- In this case, there is both an acceptance + breach
Consideration
A bargained-for exchange of legal detriment
Situations without consideration
- Illusory promises: only one party is bound to perform and performance is discretionary
-
Gratuitous/gift promises
- c.f. executed gift (legally biding intent to gift + actual/symbolic delivery)
- May be enforced by promissory estoppel
-
Past consideration
- But, modern trend is to allow recovery to prevent injustice (quasi-K)
Substitutes for consideration
-
Promissory estoppel/detrimental reliance:
- Reliance on promise is foreseeable and reasonable
- Promisee in fact relies on promise
- Justice requires enforcement
- Quasi-contract: implied in law to avoid unjust enrichment, promisee gets value of the benefit they conferred
Requirements for modification
- Common law: new consideration
- UCC: good faith, but no additional consideration
Parol Evidence Rule
- If contract is fully integrated, evidence of prior or contemporaneous communications that vary or supplement terms of the writing is not admissible
- Evidence that explains meaning of terms may be admissible
- If contract is only partially integrated, evidence of prior or contemporaneous communications that vary the terms of the writing is not admissible
- Evidence that supplements terms or explains meaning of may be admissible
Effect of a merger clause
Presume that a writing is completely integrated.
Exceptions to Parol Evidence Rule
- Attacking validity of written agreement
- Explaining terms
- Proving the existence of an oral condition precedent
Note: PER does not apply to subsequent communications or modifications
UCC warranties
-
Express warranty: a promise, description, or sample that is a basis of the bargain
- General disclaimer for an express warranty is not valid
- Opinion ≠ warranty
-
Implied warranty of merchantability
- “As-is” disclaimer okay if verbal or written so long as “merchantability” term used
- If in writing, the disclaimer must be conspicuous
-
Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose: if seller knows and buyer relies
- As-is disclaimer valid if conspicuous writing
Defenses to formation
-
Absence of mutual assent:
-
Mutual mistake (void)
- Mistaken as to a basic assumption that materially affects performance
-
Unilateral mistake (voidable)
- Only voidable by mistaken party only if non-mistaken party knew or had reason to know of misunderstanding
-
Mutual mistake (void)
- Absence of consideration (no K)
- Misrepresentation/fraud (voidable)
- Duress or undue influence (voidable)
-
Incapacity (voidable)
- Voidable only by party lacking capacity at time of contract. If they later gain capacity (e.g. turn 18) may be deemed to have ratified and thus become bound
- Exception: recovery of reasonable value for necessities
Defenses to enforcement
-
Illegality (void)
- Of consideration or performance
-
Unconscionability (unenforceable)
- Standard: “shocks the conscience” at the time of contracting
- Statute of Frauds (unenforceable)
When does statute of frauds apply
M. SOUR:
- Marriage
- Surety
- Exception: guarantor’s primary purpose is own economic motivation
- One-year
- UCC > $500
- Exception: merchant confirmation, specially manufactured goods
- Real property
- Exception: part performance
Part performance (real estate)
A land sale will be enforceable in the absence of a written contract if purchaser can show 2+/3:
- Payment
- Possession
- Significant improvements to land
Merchant conformation
An agreement for the sale of > $500 of goods (UCC) will be binding without written contract, provided that
- Both parties are merchants
- Seller sends a written a memo of agreement
- Recipient has reason to know of contents
- Recipient does not object within 10 days
Note: agreement is only enforceable to the quantity in written memo
Rights of third-party beneficiaries
-
Intended beneficiaries: can sue on K
-
Donee benficiary: intended recipient of a gift promised by K
- Can only sue promisor unless promisee told 3PB about the gift and 3PB detrimentally relies
-
Creditor beneficiary: receives the benefit of the contract as repayment of a debt owed by a party
- Can sue either promisor or promisee (but m ay only recover once)
-
Donee benficiary: intended recipient of a gift promised by K
- Incidental beneficiary: cannot sue on contract
Note: Contract modification okay until rights in 3PB vested, otherwise notice and consent of 3PB are required
Rights of third-party beneficiaries
-
Intended beneficiaries: can sue on K
-
Donee benficiary: intended recipient of a gift promised by K
- Can only sue promisor unless promisee told 3PB about the gift and 3PB detrimentally relies
-
Creditor beneficiary: receives the benefit of the contract as repayment of a debt owed by a party
- Can sue either promisor or promisee (but m ay only recover once)
-
Donee benficiary: intended recipient of a gift promised by K
- Incidental beneficiary: cannot sue on contract
Note: Contract modification okay until rights in 3PB vested, otherwise notice and consent of 3PB are required
Assignment
- Occurs when: right to contract benefit is transferred to a 3P after contract formation
-
Rights: Party to K may only assign rights they could enforce themselves;
“assignee steps into the assignor’s shoes” - Effects: establishes privity between obligor and assignee; removes privity between obligor and assignor
- Liabilities: assignee may sue obligor and assignor
Delegation
- Occurs when: duties to perform on contract is transferred to a 3P after contract formation
- Proper when: generally proper, unless involves personal judgment or skill
- Obligations: Delegatee agrees to satisfy performance obligations of delegator
-
Liabilities:
- Delegator can still be sued by obligee (unless novation).
- Delagatee can only be liable/compelled to perform if receive consideration for delegation
Conditions that excuse performance
- Anticipatory repudiation
- Prospective inability to perform
- Estoppel
- Waiver
Conditions that satisfy performance
- Substantial performance
- Complete performance
- Performance on a divisible contract
- UCC: perfect tender and delivery
Conditions that may discharge an existing duty
- Modification
- Recission
- Impossibility
- Impracticability
- Frustration of purpose
- Accord and satisfaction
- Release/novation
Conditions that create impossibility
- Illegality
- Death of necessary person
- Destruction of subject mater
Note: temporary impossibility merely suspends performance
Impracticability
- Performance becomes impracticable
- Due to an unanticipated event
- Party seeking to discharge duty is not at fault
Frustration of purpose
- An unforeseeable event frustrates the principal purpose for entering the contract
- The party seeking discharge did not cause the intervening event
Accord and satisfaction
- Accord: an agreement between parties to accept alternate performance to discharge a pre-existing duty between them
- Satisfaction: performance of new terms
Note: accord can also be satisfied by performing on original agreement (c.f. modification)
Conditions that prevent an offeror from revoking their offer
- Option (offeree must pay consideration to keep open)
-
Merchants/UCC: firm offers
- Offer signed in writing to keep offer open for time stated
- If no time stated, reasonable time < 3 months
- Detrimental reliance
- Part performance
Note: after option and firm offer periods expire, offeror must still affirmatively revoke original offer
Novation
- All parties expressly agree to release and substitute a party
- No writing required
Common law breach
-
Material breach:
- Party does not receive the substantial benefit of the bargain
- May suspend performance and pursue remedy
-
Minor breach:
- Party receives substantial benefit of the bargain
- Must continue to perform, but may seek damages
Anticipatory repudiation
An unequivocal statement/conduct indicating that a party will commit a breach can be treated as material breach.
- Failure to provide reasonable assurances within 30 days = repudiation
- Repudiating party may retract repudiation, unless other party
- Acts in reliance on repudiation
- Signals acceptance of repudiation
- Brings suit
-
Effects: aggrieved party may
- Treat as breach and sue immediately
- Early suit only an option if nonbreaching party has performance remaining besides payment
- Wait until performance date, and then sue
- Treat as breach and sue immediately
UCC breach
-
Perfect tender: if goods or delivery are defective in any way, buyer can sue for breach
- If buyer rejects nonconforming goods, seller can cure if time for performance remains
- Does not apply to installment contracts; apply substantial performance standard instead
- Warranty: breach occurs when the goods fail to fulfill the terms of the warranty
Damages
-
Expectation damages: put the non-breaching party where it would have been had the promise been performed
- Expectation damages must be reasonably foreseeable at K formation
- Also includes incidental and consequental damages, if reasonably foreseeable at K formation
- Reliance damages: If expectation damages too speculative, cost of performance made in reliance of K
- Restitution damages: value of the benefit conferred (only if breach was not willful)
-
Liquidated damages: agreed-to damage term in K
- Enforceable only to compensate for breach
- Intended to be a liquidated damages clause, not a penalty
- Reasonable estimate of damages in regards to anticipated harm
Note: Duty to mitigate. Non-breaching party can’t recover avoidable damages, has a duty to make reasonable efforts to mitigate.