Contracts Flashcards
Four types of irrevocable offers
- option contract
- merchant’s firm offer under 2-205
- performance begun following offer for unilateral contract
- detrimental reliance
How can an offer be accepted?
Unilateral contract can only be accepted through performance (becomes irrevocable once performance begins), bilateral contract can be accepted with performance or a promise to perform
Merchants confirmatory memorandum
Applies only when both parties are merchants
Written confirmation of oral agreement
Merchant must object within 10 days or lose SOF defense
Mailbox rule
In a bilateral contract, acceptance is effective upon dispatch
Exceptions: option contract, unilateral contract, offer stipulates that acceptance is valid only upon receipt
Acceptance under UCC
Generally, a buyers order is an offer
Seller can accept by promising to ship the goods or promptly shipping the goods
Frustration of purpose
Purpose of the contract has become valueless by virtue of an intervening event
Commercial impracticability
Unforeseen circumstances that make performance extremely and unreasonably difficult and expensive
Shipping nonconforming goods
Shipping nonconforming goods is both an acceptance of the offer and a breach of the contract
Buyer can accept the whole shipment, reject the whole shipment, or accept any commercially reasonable unit and reject the rest and seek damages
Accommodation exception for nonconforming goods
If seller uses prompt shipment as form of acceptance and notifies the buyer, that goods are being offered as an accommodation, the shipment is viewed as a counteroffer, so buyer can wholly accept or wholly reject the shipment
Acceptance under UCC – Battle of the Forms
An acceptance that contains additional or different terms is effective as an acceptance, unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional terms
Where both parties are merchants, the additional terms become part of the contract, unless
-they materially alter the terms,
-offer expressly limits acceptance, or
-offeror rejects within a reasonable time
SoF Specially Manufactured Goods Exception
- Goods must be specially manufactured for the buyer
- Seller must have made a substantial beginning on their manufacture or made commitments for their purchase AND
- Goods must not be suitable for sale in the seller’s ordinary course of business
If the exception applies, K may be enforceable without a writing
K =
MA (O + A) + C – D
Express contracts are formed by
Language, oral or written
Implied contracts are formed by
Conduct
Are quasi-contracts contracts?
NO
Bilateral contract
Exchange of a promise for a promise
Each party a promisor and promisee
Unilateral contract
Offeror asks for performance rather than a promise
Offeror/promisor promises to pay promisee on completion
Once the act is completed, a contract is formed
Can ONLY accept by performance, not a return promise
A unilateral contract occurs in only two situations:
(1) when the offeror clearly (unambiguously) indicates that completion of performance is the only manner of acceptance; and (2) where there is an offer to the public, such as a reward offer
Look for: “my offer can be accepted only by …”
Ex: reward for lost dog
Definition of “goods”
Anything movable when identified to the contract
UCC definition of “merchant”
for seller/buyers:
one who regularly deals in goods of the kind sold or who otherwise by their profession holds themselves out as having special knowledge or skills as to the practices or goods involved
for general business practices:
almost anyone
Which law applies for contracts involving goods and nongoods?
determine which aspect is dominant and apply the law governing that aspect to the whole contract
However, if the contract divides payment between goods and services, then Article 2 will apply to the sale portion and the common law will apply to the services portion
For a communication to be an offer, it must
create a reasonable expectation in the offeree that the offeror is willing to enter into a contract on the basis of the offered terms
consider:
-was there an expression of a promise, undertaking or commitment to enter into a k?
-were there certainty and definiteness in the essential terms?
-was there a communication of the above to the offeree?
MUST be objective intent to enter into a contract (reasonable person standard)
Advertisements
Generally not offers, but invitations to deal
Can be offers if there is a quantity term
Exceptions to the general rule that ads are not offers
- ad contains a promise
- terms are certain and definite
- offeree is clearly identified
Offer must be definite and certain in its terms. How to determine?
Whether enough of the essential terms have been provide to make it capable of enforcement?
- offeree’s name
- offer’s subject matter
- price
Land sale offers must include
- price
- description of land (some particularity, but a deed description is not required)
Sale of goods offers must include
Quantity term
court will fill in price if needed
Requirements contract
B promises to buy from S all goods B requires
Output contract
S promises to sell to B all goods S produces, B agrees to buy that amount
Good faith assumption for requirements and outputs contracts
It is assumed that the parties will act in good faith; so, there can’t be a tender of or a demand for a quantity “unreasonably disproportionate” to (1) any stated estimate, or (2) (in the absence of a stated estimate) any normal or other- wise comparable prior output or requirements
Employment contracts that don’t specify the duration
Creates an at-will contract
Offers for contracts for services must include
The nature of the work
If a contract does not specify the price
Does not prevent formation EXCEPT in real property contracts
If it is goods, the UCC provides that the price will be a reasonable price at the time of delivery
Methods of termination
- lapse of time
- revocation
- rejection
- death
Termination by lapse of time
Offer terminated of not accepted within time specified by offer or within reasonable time
For the exam, more than a month – raise the issue
Termination by rejection
-express rejection (ex statement by offeree)
-counteroffer (same subject matter as original offer, but differs in terms)
COUNTEROFFERS KILL
–Mere bargaining is not rejection (“will you take x?”)
. = counteroffer
? = mere bargaining
Counteroffers are
Both a rejection and a new offer (conditional acceptance)
Reverses the roles of the parties
Termination by revocation
Offeror’s retraction of offer
Can be done any time before acceptance
Offer may be indirectly revoked if
-offeree receives correct information
-from reliable source
-of offeror’s acts indicating revocation
OFFEREE HAS TO KNOW
Revocations are effective upon
Receipt
NO mailbox rule
Option contract definition
Offeree gives consideration for offeror to not revoke offer for a period of time
Limitations on power to revoke
- option contract
- merchant’s firm offer under Art 2
- detrimental reliance
- beginning performance in response to true unilateral contract offer
Merchant’s firm offer rule
-merchant promises
-in signed writing (letterhead works)
-to keep offer open for time stated or a reasonable time
Enforceable for up to three months
Consideration not needed to keep offer open
Detrimental reliance and revocation
When the offeror could reasonably expect that the offeree would rely to their detriment on the offer, and the offeree does so rely, the offer will be held irrevocable as an option contract for a reasonable length of time
Mere preparation to perform
Does not equal performance
If substantial, could constitute detrimental reliance if foreseeable
The following events terminate an offer by operation of law:
- death or insanity of either party
- destruction of subject matter
- supervening illegality
Effect of death on a formed contract
Not automatically terminated
The obligation goes to the estate of the deceased
Language of the offer controls the manner of
Acceptance
Can the right to accept an offer be assigned?
Only if it is an option contract
Acceptance of an offer for bilateral contract
unless an offer specifically provides that it may be accepted only through performance, it will be construed as an offer to enter into a bilateral contract and may be accepted either by a promise to perform or by the beginning of performance
a unilateral contract cannot be accepted until performance is
completed
starting performance can create an option so that the offer is irrevocable
(offeree is not bound to complete)
Shipping the wrong goods =
Acceptance and breach
unless sent as an accommodation with shipment as acceptance
Does silence equal acceptance?
No
Exception: custom (eel skins)
common law mirror image rule
acceptance must mirror offer terms exactly
Article 2 acceptance
No mirror image rule
“seasonable expression” of acceptance
Under Article 2, if both parties to the contract are merchants, additional terms in the acceptance will be included in the contract unless:
- materially alter the original terms of the offer
- offer expressly limits acceptance to those terms OR
- offeror objects within a reasonable time
For Article 2 acceptance, are disclaimers considered a material change?
Yes
Material change = likely to cause hardship or surprise to offeror
Industry custom is not a material change
Mailbox rule
Acceptance effective when sent
Exceptions to the mailbox rule
- offer stipulates not effective until received
- option contract
- offeree sends a rejection and then an acceptance (then whichever arrives first is effective)
- offeree sends an acceptance and then a rejection, then the acceptance is effective UNLESS the rejection arrives first and the offeror detrimentally relies on it
Two elements of consideration
- bargained-for-exchange
2. legal value (benefit to promisor OR detriment to promise)
Promise for a promise equals consideration?
Yes
Can forbearance constitute consideration?
yes
Is past consideration consideration?
no
Consideration and modifications
Common law – need new consideration to modify (pre-existing duty rule)
Article 2 –no consideration required to modify (just need good faith)
Undisputed debt
Mastercard can make the promise and break the promise to take a lesser amount
Promissory estoppel
Does not require consideration—only the right answer if there is no consideration
A promise is enforceable if necessary to prevent injustice if:
1. The promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance AND
2. such action or forbearance is in fact induced
(ex: bookkeeper who quit her job bc of $2k grandpa promise)
Defendants without capacity can
Disaffirm contract
Forms of incapacity
- minority
- mental incapacity
- intoxication
Retaining benefits after gaining capacity =
Implied affirmation
Incapacitated party still liable for
Necessaries
but only in restitution for reasonable value, not the contract price
Duress can be either ___ or ___
physical or economic
Effect of ambiguity in contract terms
Neither party aware of the ambiguity: no contract unless both intended same meaning
Both parties aware: no contract unless both intended same meaning
One party aware: binding contract based on ignorant party’s reasonable belief of the meaning of the ambiguous words (subjective intent counts here)
If there is a mutual mistake about existing facts, the contract may be voidable by the adversely affected party if:
(ex cubic zirconia v diamond)
- mistake concerns a basic assumption
- mistake has a material effect on the agreed-upon exchange
- party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk of the mistake
Mutual mistake about the existence of the subject matter vs mutual mistake about the value
- subject matter - no contract (Rose the pensive cow)
- value – contract
Unilateral mistake
Only one party is mistaken
Does not prevent formation unless the nonmistaken party knew or should have known about the mistake
Must be material and obvious
Mistaken party must not have borne risk of mistake
Unconscionability
Unfair terms AND oppressive surprise
Tested when contract formed
Common instances of unconscionability
- inconspicuous risk-shifting provisions
- contracts of adhesion
- exculpatory clauses
- limitations on remedies