Con Law Flashcards
Requirements for standing
To assert standing, P must est concrete, direct personal stake in outcome
1. injury in fact
- causation
- redressability
What can Congress regulate under the commerce clause?
Under the commerce clause, congress can regulate channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce and any activity that has a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce
A regulation of intrastate activity that is is economic in nature will be upheld if
rational basis exists to conclude that the activity substantially affects interstate commerce
Test for intrastate activity that is is noneconomic in nature
regulation will be upheld if Congressional finding that the activity substantially affects interstate commerce (stricter test)
(dormant commerce clause)
State regulation of interstate commerce will be upheld only if:
- regulation is nondiscriminatory
- regulation does not unduly burden interstate commerce
When does strict scrutiny apply?
Applies when:
discrimination is based on a suspect classification
(RAN: race, alienage, national origin)
Fundamental right is implicated (vote, travel, privacy) (Right to Privacy (CAMPERS): contraception, abortion, marriage, procreation, education (private), relations (family), sexual relations)
What is the test for strict scrutiny?
government must show that
- law is necessary to achieve (no less restrictive means)
- compelling govt interest (necessary or crucial for society)
When does intermediate scrutiny apply?
Applies when:
- discrimination is based on gender
- discrimination is based on child being born to unwed parents
What is the test for intermediate scrutiny?
Government must show
- law is substantially related (close fit needed, not necessarily the least restrictive means)
- to an important government interest (less than compelling, more than legitimate) (gender discrimination requires “exceedingly persuasive justification)
When does rational basis apply?
Applies when neither strict or intermediate scrutiny apply
Applies if discrimination is based on age, poverty/wealth, mental incapacity, or necessities for life
What is the test for rational basis?
P (not govt) must show that
- law is not rationally related
- to any legitimate govt interest
What test applies to regulations of speech content?
Strict scrutiny
What test applies to regulations of speech conduct?
time/place/manner test
What is the time/place/manner test for public forums and designated public forums?
Regulation must
1. further important govt interest 2. be narrowly tailored 3. leave open alternative channels of communication
What is the time/place/manner test for nonpublic or limited public forums?
Regulation must
1. be viewpoint neutral 2. be reasonably related to legitimate govt purpose
Six categories of unprotected speech
- speech advocating imminent lawlessness
- fighting words
- obscenity
- child pornography
- false/deceptive advertising
- Defamation
Justiciability
Federal courts can only decide an actual case or controversy
- no advisory opinions
- ripe, not moot
- brought by someone with standing
Advisory opinions lack
- actual dispute between adverse parties OR
- legally binding effect on the parties
Ripeness requirements
- issue is fit for a judicial decision (legal, not factual issues) AND
- plaintiff would suffer substantial hardship in the absence of review
Mootness definition
A live controversy must exist at all stages of review
Mootness exceptions
- controversies capable of repetition that evade review due to their inherently short duration
- cases where D voluntarily stops the offending practice but is free to resume
- class actions in which the class representative’s controversy has become moot, but the claim of at least one other member is viable
Requirements for Standing
- Injury in fact
- particularized injury
- concrete injury - Causation
- Redressability
Exceptions to standing requirements
- taxpayer has standing to challenge their tax bill
- a person MAY have standing to allege that federal action violates 10A by interfering with powers reserved to the states as long as the person has a redressable injury
- people have standing to challenge congressional spending (has to be spending, not providing property) on 1A establishment cause grounds
When can a claimant with standing in their own right assert the rights of a third party?
- it is difficult for the third party to assert their own rights OR
- a close relationship exists between the claimant and the third party
When does an organization have standing to sue on behalf of its members?
- there is an injury in fact to the members
- the members’ injury is related to the organization’s purpose AND
- individual member participation in the lawsuit is not required
Standing for free speech overbreadth claims
A person has standing to bring a free speech claim alleging that the government restricted substantially more speech than necessary (in other words, that the restriction was overbroad), even if that person’s own speech would not be protected under the First Amendment. Essentially, the plaintiff can bring a claim on behalf of others whose speech would be protected under the First Amendment.
–does not apply to restrictions on commercial speech
11A sovereign immunity
The Supreme Court has held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity reflected in the Eleventh Amendment bars a private party’s suit against a state in federal and state courts (and in federal and state agencies)
Does not apply to claims against local governments, by the US, by other states, proceedings in federal bankruptcy courts
Exceptions to 11A sovereign immunity
- consent/waiver
- certain actions against state officers (1. actions to enjoin an officer from future conduct that violates the Constitution or federal law, even if this will require prospective payment from the state (the state cannot be made to pay retroactive damages); and 2. actions for damages against an officer personally)
- Congress can remove a state’s immunity for actions under 14A power to prevent discrimination, but the removal of immunity must be unmistakably clear (abrogation)
When does abstention apply?
- disposition rests on an unsettled question of state law
- Federal courts will not enjoin pending state criminal proceedings (and in some cases pending state administrative or civil proceedings involving an important state interest), except in cases of proven harassment or prosecutions taken in bad faith
Adequate and independent state grounds
The Supreme Court will not exercise jurisdiction if the state court judgment is based on adequate and independent state law grounds—even if federal issues are involved. State law grounds are adequate if they are fully dispositive of the case. They are independent if the decision is not based on federal case interpretations of identical federal provisions. If the state court has not clearly indicated that its decision rests on state law, the Supreme Court may hear the case.
What powers can Congress exercise?
Those enumerated in art 1 sec 8 and those necessary and proper to carry out its enumerated powers
Does congress have police powers, like the states?
No, but it has similar powers over DC, federal lands, military bases, and Indian reservations
Can the necessary and proper clause support a federal law on its own?
No. Cannot support federal law standing alone, it has to be linked to one of Congress’s enumerated powers
Tax and spend power- what can Congress spend on?
Congress has the power to tax and spend to provide for the general welfare- for any public purpose not prohibited by the constitution
(this general welfare clause does not support nonspending regulations)
Requirements for Congress to impose conditions on the grant of money to state/local governments
Such conditions are valid if
- they are clearly stated
- they relate to the purpose of the program
- they are not unduly coercive AND (ex: Medicaid expansion)
- they do not otherwise violate the constitution
When can congress use commerce power to regulate?
Congress can regulate commerce with foreign nations, native American tribes, and among states
Requirements for a federal law regulating commerce to be within Congress’s Commerce Clause power
- Regulate the channels of interstate commerce
- regulate the instrumentalities of interstate commerce OR
- regulate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce
When can Congress regulate intrastate commerce under the substantial effect prong?
If the court finds a rational basis on which Congress could conclude that the activity in the aggregate substantially affects interstate commerce
- 10A prohibits regulating noneconomic activity in areas traditionally regulated by state/local govts
- congress cannot compel activity
A valid delegation of legislative power requires
Intelligible standards for the delegate to follow
Bicameralism and presentment requirements
To pass a law, Congress must use bicameralism (passage of a bill by both houses of Congress) followed by presentment to the President for signature or veto
NO line-item vetos
NO legislative veto
Executive Powers
Art II
President must faithfully execute the laws
Implied presidential powers
Strongest when authorized by congress
Where Congress is silent- twilight zone
Against the express will of Congress –likely invalid
Requirements for president to enter treaty
President has the power to enter with consent of 2/3 of senate
Treaties that are self-executing ___ conflicting state laws
Invalidate
they are supreme, like federal law
Which prevails in a conflict between federal law and a valid treaty?
Last in time prevails
Which prevails in a conflict between federal constitution and a valid treaty?
Constitution
Executive Agreements
- no senate approval required
- prevail over conflicting state laws
- federal laws prevail over executive agreements
Exclusive federal powers
- where power of state is expressly limited
- inherently federal powers that can only be exercised by the fed govt
Exclusive state powers
- those not granted to fed government
- general police powers (health, safety, welfare)
Tenth Amendment
Powers not granted to the federal government are reserved to states or people
Congress cannot compel states to pass laws, administer federal programs – anti-commandeering principle
As a practical matter, SCOTUS ______ strikes down a federal regulation or tax that impacts state or local govt entities on 10A grounds
ALMOST NEVER
Preemption
Can be express (in statute)
Can be implied
-conflict between federal and state law such that it is impossible to follow both
-state law impedes or frustrates federal law
-field preemption: a valid federal law may impliedly “occupy” the field, thus barring any state or local law, even if nonconflicting (inferred intent by congress)