Contracts Flashcards
Generally: Big Ticket Items
(1) UCC or CL
(2) Formation Issues
(3) Modification
(4) Parole Evidence Rule
(5) Performance
(6) Third Party Rights
(7) Remedies
(8) Quasi-K
UCC or CL? –> Goods/Merchants
Goods
UCC governs “sales of goods”; if UCC applies, it trumps any contrary CL rule.
–> Even if UCC, CL still applies unless UCC contradicts it.
—> Goods: any movable item; does not include intangibles (goodwill, IP), money, legal claims, services, or real property.
Ks that do not involve the sale of goods are covered by the CL of Ks.
—> Examples are services Ks, Ks involving real property, and assignments of legal claims.
Merchants
The UCC defines “merchant” in terms of his special knowledge/skill w/ respect to the practices/goods involved in a transaction.
—> Any person may be considered a merchant even if he only has knowledge of the goods, or knowledge of the practices.
UCC or CL? –> Hybrid Cases - Predominance Test
Hybrid cases (involves both sale of goods + service Ks) - determined by PREDOMINANT purpose of the transaction (majority rule).
3 Factors for determining predominant purpose:
(1) K language: was K described as a goods K?
(2) Nature of supplier’s business (ie Best Buy sells goods)
(3) Value of goods v. services (ie $30 in goods but $2 in services)
Formation Issues –> Issues
(1) Offer?
(2) Acceptance?
(3) Consideration?
(4) Defenses to Formation
Formation Issues –> Offer: General Rule
To be an offer, party’s communication must meet 2 Elements:
(1) Outward manifestation (oral, written, or via conduct)
(2) Signal that acceptance will conclude the deal (grant power of acceptance)
Formation Issues –> Offer: Multiple Offerees
Commercial Advertisements
- -> American Rule: Ads, catalogs, price lists are invitations for offers, since responses may exceed available supply of goods or services.
- ———–> EXCEPTION: language that identifies who gets limited supply of goods even if there is an excess demand (ex: first come, first services; first 10 customers)
Auction
—> Situations where an item is sold to the highest bidder.
Reward Offers
–> Offers because they are communications that promise $ in exchange for performance of specific tasks (ex: $500 for finding/returning lost dog)
Formation Issues –> Offer: Open Offer - Option Contracts
(CL) Elements:
(1) Offer
(2) Separate promise to keep it open; and
(3) Valid mechanism for enforcing subsidiary promise (consideration is the most common way)
Special Rule for Construction Contracts
Reliance/Construction: Cts will hold offers open when the offeree has detrimentally relied on them (such as when general contractors rely on subcontractor’s bids in forming their own bids on a project).
Formation Issues –> Offer: Open Offer - UCC Firm Offer Rule
Irrevocable offer by merchant to buy or sell goods w/o consideration.
3 Requirements:
(1) offer made by a merchant (in the business of buying or selling goods);
(2) in a writing signed by the merchant; and
(3) expressly stating it will be held open
- —> Irrevocable for time stated or reasonable time, BUT no longer than 3 months even if stated otherwise.
Formation Issues –> Offer: Offer Terminated - Ways
1) Rejection
2) Revocation
3) Impossibility
4) Lapse of time
5) Death
Formation Issues –> Offer: Offer Terminated - Rejection
3 Ways:
(1) OUTRIGHT rejection
(2) Rejection via COUNTEROFFER (counteroffer = rejection + new offer)
- ———> EXCEPTION: offeree can test the waters by making a mere inquiry
(3) Rejection via non-conforming acceptance (MIRROR IMAGE RULE - CL)
REVIVAL
An offeror has the power to revive an offer that the offeree has rejected (and with it the offeree’s power of acceptance), and he can also revive an offer that has lapsed.
—> All he must do is communicate the revival to the offeree.
Formation Issues –> Offer: Offer Terminated - Revocation
Offeror (person who made the offer) may revoke an offer at any time, for any reason.
–> Must be revoked before acceptance + revocation must be communicated to the offeree.
Unilateral Ks
Once offeree begins performance, an option K is created and offeror may not revoke.
–> Mere preparations do not create an option K, only beginning performance.
Two ways to communicate revocation to offeree:
- -> Direct revocation: offeror directly communicates to offeree an intent to withdraw the offer
- -> Indirect revocation: 2 requirements:
(1) Offeror takes action that is inconsistent w/ the intent to go through w/ the offer; and
(2) Offeree learns of such action from a reliable source
Multiple Offerees
Under 2nd Rest of Ks, where an offer is made by advertisement in a newspaper or other general notification to the public, the power of acceptance is terminated when:
(1) the notice of revocation is communicated by advertisement or other general notification equivalent to that used for the offer and
(2) no better means of notification is reasonably available
Formation Issues –> Offer: Offer Terminated - Impossibility
What circumstances are we likely to find OBJECTIVE impossibility?
(1) When subject matter of the K is DESTROYED.
(2) When there is a personal services K and the performing party has DIED or becomes INCAPACITATED
- –> Death/incapacity of either party after offer is made terminates the power of acceptance.
(3) When supervening law/legal developments have rendered performance legally impermissible (ILLEGAL).
Formation Issues –> Offer: Offer Terminated - Lapse of Time
Lapse occurs after time STATED in offer or after a REASONABLE time.
Reasonable time determined by:
(1) SUBJECT matter/market conditions; and
(2) degree of URGENCY and means of transmission
FACE-TO-FACE Conversation Rule
–> An offer made in face-to-face conversation generally lapses at the end of the conversation.
Formation Issues –> Acceptance: Mirror Image Rule (CL)
CL Rule; acceptance must mirror the terms, and any variation is a counteroffer (and a rejection of the initial offer).
Unless the K language or circumstances unambiguously indicate otherwise, acceptance may be made in any manner and by any medium reasonable under the circumstances.
—> UCC rejects CL mirror image rule and recognizes binding Ks despite presence of nonconforming acceptance in two situations: (1) the shipment of nonconforming goods and (2) battle of the forms.
Formation Issues –> Acceptance: Different and Additional Terms (UCC)
When parties enter a K (typically a real time via face to face or telephonic communications) and then one/both parties follow up w/ written confirmation containing terms additional to or different from terms of original deal.
Consumers
—> If at least one of the parties to the transaction is a consumer, any additional/different terms are mere proposals for addition to the K which the receiving party may accept/reject.
Merchants
- –> Any additional terms are part of the K unless:
(1) they would materially alter the K; or
(2) the receiving party objects to them w/in a reasonable time. - –> Any terms in a confirmation differing from prior agreement are proposals for inclusion in the K, which the receiving party may accept/reject.
- –> If both merchants send written confirmations and those confirmations contain conflicting terms, then the KNOCKOUT RULE applies and neither party’s term is in the K.
Formation Issues –> Acceptance: Mailbox Rule
(Restatement/Majority) Mailbox rule is not applicable and acceptance is only effective upon receipt.
Acceptance by mail (CL Mailbox Rule)
- -> acceptance by mail is effective upon DISPATCH if properly posted
- -> Applies only to acceptances and not to any other communication (ie not revocations/rejections)
- -> Default rule: it applies unless the offer provides otherwise
If offeree dispatches two responses to offer (one purporting to reject the offer and one purporting to accept it):
–> Mailbox rule does not govern if rejection is mailed before acceptance, and whichever arrives first will be effective.
Formation Issues –> Acceptance: CL Rule
Acceptance must:
(1) mirror terms of offer; and
(2) be communicated to the offeror
Formation Issues –> Consideration: Generally
General rule: promise is unenforceable unless support by consideration.
Bargain theory
–> promise is supported by consideration if it is based on a bargain for exchange
Bargained-for exchange
–> there was something (goods or services) that was promised, and the promise must have been made in order to obtain something else of value (quid pro quo for making the promise - usually a return promise or performance)
Whether there is a benefit to the promisor and/or a detriment to the promise.
- –> Legal detriment test is whether the promisee is:
(1) doing something he had a legal right NOT to do, OR
(2) forgoing some activity he HAD a legal right to do
Insuff Consideration v. Failure of Consideration
- –> Insuff: legally insuff
- –> Failure: a claim that the party has not performed in accordance w/ his promise.
Cts do not police the equivalence or fairness of the exchange.
Formation Issues –> Consideration: Not Consideration
Preexisting Duty Rule
A promisor cannot provide consideration where that consideration is a duty the promisor is already obligated to perform.
Illusory Promise
Promise of performance that leaves performance to the unlimited discretion of the promising party –> does NOT constitute consideration.
–> Ex: agree to paint a portrait and recipient agrees to pay for it if he decides he wants it.
Executed Gifts
Promise to make a gift generally unenforceable due to insufficient consideration.
–> Exception: gratuitous transfers are legally binding
Past or Moral Consideration
General rule: a promise in exchange for something already given/performed is NOT supported by consideration.
Formation Issues –> Consideration: Forbearance of a Claim or Defense
Valid consideration exists when a party agrees to forbear a claim or defense in exchange for a promise or performance by the other party (even if the claim/defense proves invalid).
However, forbearance to assert or the surrender of a claim/defense which proves to be invalid is not consideration unless:
(1) the claim or defense is in fact doubtful bc of uncertainty as to the facts or law; or
(2) the forbearing party believes that the claim or defense may be fairly determined to be valid.
Formation Issues –> Consideration: Output and Requirements Contracts
Open quantity terms arise in two contexts:
(1) Output contract: buyer agrees to purchase all or a percentage of a seller’s output for a particular good
(2) Requirements contract: seller agrees to supply the buyer w/ all or a percentage of the buyer’s reqs for a particular good.
Under the UCC, the party entitled to determine the particular quantity of goods to be sole (either the buyer demanding delivery of his reqs or the seller demanding purchase of her output) must make that determination in good faith.
UCC also prohibits any unreasonably disproportionate demand or tender, if there was either:
(1) a stated estimate; OR
(2) a past course of dealing
Formation Issues –> Consideration: Promissory Estoppel
Promisee that reasonably relies to his detriment on gratuitous promise may be able to enforce that promise even w/o consideration.
4 Requirements:
(1) A promise
(2) Foreseeable reliance
(3) Actual reliance (must be induced by the promise)
(4) Injustice w/o enforcement
Factors to analyze injustice requirement above:
(1) strength of proof of the other 3 reqs
(2) blameworthiness or willfulness of the breach
(3) relative position or equities of the parties
(4) extent to which the reliance was detrimental
(5) availability of alternatives short of enforcing the promise
Remedies
The type of interest a party may recover under promissory estoppel depends on the jdx, as some cts award:
(1) expectation damages;
(2) reliance damage; or
(3) choose on case-by-case basis and tailor the remedy to the injustice at issue
Formation Issues –> Defenses to Formation: SoF - Generally
General rule: oral and written Ks are equally enforceable.
SOF = EXCEPTION : if the K falls under the SOF, it must be:
(1) IN WRITING; and
- –> All that is necessary is that the writing be a memorandum of the agreement which can be prepared before, during, or after formation.
- –> Following terms are reqd:
- Identity of the parties to the transaction;
- The nature and subject matter of the K; and
- The essential terms of the agreement, such as price and date for performance
(2) SIGNED by party whom enforcement is sought
- –> Any symbol with intention to authenticate the writing (ex: initials, typed, stamped, or preprinted signature or letterhead).
Formation Issues –> Defenses to Formation: SoF - Applicable Ks
6 Categories of Ks Subject to SOF = MYLEGS
–> Some categories have specific limitations w/in them that narrow the reach of the SOF.
(1) MARRIAGE Ks
(2) Ks that can’t be performed w/in one YEAR of their making
(3) Ks for the sale of LAND
(4) Ks of an EXECUTOR or administrator to answer for a duty of a decedent
(5) Ks of GUARANTEE or suretyship
(6) Ks for the SALE of goods at a price of $500 or more (UCC 2-201)