Context in 1603 Flashcards

1
Q

What were issues in 1603 regarding society?

A

The population had reached 5 million but the agriculture industry and production had not followed, creating inflation and unemployment with a growing subclass who couldn’t rent or own property.
In the 1620s harvest failure led to famine in this class.
The rich could charge higher prices for properties, charging triple the amount to take advantage of the subclass.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the role of justices of the peace, (JPs)?

A

These were elected gentry who worked for free. The public often rioted due to food shortages, demanding tithes, (food donations to Church), and enclosure fences in times of unemployment. JPs had to listen to these concerns, offer sanctions such as whipping and fines, but also provide an ear to their voice. The JPs would have to act as judges to lesser crimes. Gentry were the landowners of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the idea behind commonwealth and why was the masterless man feared?

A

Commonwealth described England as a tree which was interlocked with connections, and the king at the top. Everybody in England had duties to the king and each other, fulfilling duties for their neighbors. Tenants aided service to the nobility in return for protection and shelter, as the nobility relied on the monarch for formal influence. The vagrant had no allegiance to swear and so was regarded with suspicion and punished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did some men in towns prove the Great Chain of Being to not always be true?

A

Men were able to move up or down through trading. By selling types of cloth at a surplus, to replace broadcloth, a heavy cloth that shrunk after weaving to make it thicker, these men were able to receive lots of money through cheap mass production. Agriculture had not reached the same surpluses. Many examples of successful trading companies include the English East India Company, 1600. These men were rich merchants. Meanwhile, in London as trading increased, by 1650 the population had hit 400,000. These men could provide James with a loan due to their wealth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did peerage include?

A

Dukes, earls, and barons/lords.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What sources were available for limited social movement?

A

The church, the law, military service, and through receiving the notice and favour of an influential patron.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who were included in the landed classes?

A

Baronets.
Knights.
Gentry with no title such as yeomen farmers and smallholders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who were included in the merchant classes?

A

Merchants
Bankers
City officials
Master-craftsmen
Skilled laborers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which groups were included in the lower classes?

A

Laborers and paupers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the Royal prerogative and how did laws get enforced and passed?

A

Royal prerogative was the king’s power to act as an authority without others. He could employ and control the distribution of offices as well as controlling foreign policy, war, peace, the regulation of oversees trade, controlling the coinage, and pardoning criminals.
Since the establishment of the Protestant Church in the 16th century, the crown was the head and was able to radically alter practice. The King could change laws through issuing proclamations. This could lead to a statute where parliament would pass the law in the common law courts, (law established by long custom through court decisions). Only the King-in-parliament could pass statute law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the King believe about his power compared to parliament ?

A

The King believed in the ‘divine right of kings,’ which is that he was appointed by God and therefore representative institutions only exist at his pleasure. He alone was the lawmaker and there would be no safeguard against rulers. Meanwhile those wanting to limit the king’s power argued that the ancient constitution and common law took centuries to write and should not be changed by the King. His power should not also determine the liberty of subjects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which groups did Sir Thomas Smith define to prove England was landed and hierarchical?

A

Sir Thomas Smith - gentlemen, yeomen, husbandmen, and cottagers/labourers
1- Gentlemen, there were peerage with honours, and the gentry who were knights, esquires, and mere gentlemen. Contemporaries argue they had leisure and independence.
2- Husbandmen - these men were poorer than yeomen and most susceptible for natural disasters with harsh economic climate.
3- Cottagers and labourers lived off allotments or smallholdings and earned money wages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is evidence for and against England being landed and hierarchical?

A

Landed, hierarchical society. The earls of Derby had estates in Cheshire and Lancashire, and mansions in Knowsley and Lathom. In 1587, the fourth Earl, in the Household of Henry, had over a hundred people, with 26 gentlemen, or their sons, from Cheshire and Lancashire serving for land, annuities, and influence in court. In 1597, when he returned from London, he was met by local gentlemen, tenants, and retainers.
Newer non-landed groups not included.

Increase in merchants and professional people; merchants were often sons of landowners or used wealth to become landowners. Apprentices and labourers increased, with the sons of yeomen farmers apprenticed to craftsmen or merchants, while farmers were also part time wool cloth or metalworkers. However, there was an increase in non-landed groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was evidence for and against large families in early 17th century?

A

For: Rich and elite landowning gentlemen often had large families.
Against : Average family of size 4.75 people with husband, wife, young children, and servants. Marriage during this time was at the average age of mid to late twenties, as young adults had to first find a household. Livings were earned through apprenticeships or through having roles as ‘servants in husbandry,’ as people had yearly contracts, moving farm to farm, and developing into ploughers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is evidence against English being immobile?

A

Contemporaries have found from parish records those baptised there often did not die there.
Subsistence migrants often moved for better work opportunities. The Shropshire village of Myddle had migrants flocking there, alongside Northamptonshire Forest, Sussex Weald, and moorland areas of Cumbria, pastoral regions. Later on, in 1620s, many migrated to Virginia, US. Other betterment migrants moved shorter distances on employment. This was due to unstable agrarian economy, contemporary marriage, and family customs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Did England have strong kinship ties?

A

Merchants and landowners relied on kinship ties to sell land, but most people relied on neighbours in times of need. Poor aid was offered by parishes.
Charivari was where neighbours would intimidate cuckolds who broke the natural order of female obedience to men, letting their wives be adulterers, with intimidating laughter and the banging of pots and pans, or beating them up.
Rogation week was a Church event, where harvest suppers and sheep-shearing events were held, alongside processions around the parish boundary, to celebrate the week preceding Ascension Day, the day commemorating Christ’s ascension to heaven.

17
Q

Was local particularism stronger than the sense of being English?

A

Alan Everett in the 60s emphasised the county community, with people using ‘country,’ to describe their locality as opposed to England. Even cottagers and labourers could be part of the grand jury or among witnesses for county quarter sessions and assizes. However, while localities may have been considered to have their own ethos, England had a common governmental and legal system, and local particularism would not have been as strong as in countries such as France, and social groups commonly moved. Local identities wouldn’t stop a sense of being English; people just had commitments to different groups, kin, neighbors, family, county, and country.

18
Q

What were consequences of a growing gap between the elite and the poor? what did they fear?

A

The gap between gentlemen and yeomen farmers and cottagers+labourers grew, with popular riots exploding as a result of grains being taken from famine-stricken areas. The landed elite feared the ‘masterless man,’ and rebellion by the ‘many-headed monster’ of the poor. Alongside this, the non-landed elite grew in size. However, food riots never developed into full-blown rebellions.

19
Q

Describe the King’s royal prerogative and the structure of Parliament?

A

The King had a royal prerogative. He could summon and dissolve Parliament, and prorogue Parliament to prevent sustained opposition by adjourning sessions and calling them to later events. They could also veto legislation; Elizabeth vetoed 70, while James vetoed 7 and Charles I vetoed 1. They could appoint and dismiss ministers, judges and bishops and declare war and peace. England was a mixed monarchy as Parliament involved all three bodies to pass laws. The House of Lords included the Lords Spiritual and Lords Temporal. Temporal consisted of peers who were non-churchmen, growing to 126 from 81 by 1628. Spiritual consisted of 24 bishops with the Archbishops of York and Canterbury.