Content Folder 2: Effectiveness at creating national unity Flashcards
What are the two criteria for effectiveness of national unity policies?
Social stability and a widely-accepted national identity
Social stability: extent to which groups accept central national identity. Evidence of social disruptions or separatist challenge
Identity: Ideological uniformity (amorphous)
Spectrum of social stability
Social stability –> Protests, demonstrations, etc. –> separatist challenge
Evaluation of Burma
Generally unsuccessful. Separatist tendencies persisted, civil war, centrality of military and BWS ideology rejected from 1988
Evaluation of Philippines
Separatist tendencies in Mindanao, no widely-accepted basis of national unity or identity
Evaluation of Indonesia
Secession of East Timor/Timor Leste, separatist tendencies in Aceh and irian Jaya, but Pancasila democracy widely-accepted as a possible basis for national unity. At least in majority areas
Evaluation of Thailand
Separatist tendencies in the south; Adaptation of “nation, religion, king” with modern citizenship gained much traction and legitimacy among people, at least in majority areas
Evaluation of Singapore
Territorial unity achieved. Multiculturalism widely-accepted as basis of social relations, but absence of larger national identity beyond coexistence within CMIO model
Evaluation of Malaysia
Territorial unity achieved, Malay domination accepted by different groups, but absence of larger national identity beyond elite compact and coexistence
Evaluation of Vietnam
Territorial unity achieved. Marxism and CPV widely accepted as basis of national unity in politics, economics and social system
Arguments for effectiveness
Peaceful coexistence amidst ethnic diversity. Some states even achieved a clear central identity: SG, M, V
Concessions pacified most ethnic groups and mitigated escalation of minority demands: I Aceh, P Cordillerans
Except Timorese, separatist groups contained
Arguments for limited effectiveness
Persistent separatist challenge points to rejection of central authority. Breakdown of ceasefires. In any case, ceasefires are at best temporary political solutions: I, B
Underlying rifts despite social stability. Elusiveness of a widely accepted identity beyond ethnic definitions: SG, M