Consumer Rights Flashcards
what does DTPA stand for?
Deceptive Trade Practices Act
how did the Texas legislature want the DTPA to be construed/interpreted?
the DTPA is to be liberally construed in favor of consumers
what are the two main purposes of the DTPA?
- to protect consumers against false, misleading, and deceptive acts or practices.
- to provide efficient and economical procedures to secure such protection.
the DTPA creates a private cause of action. T/F
T
what kind of damages are recoverable through DTPA? how does this relate to the big thing that DTPA does differently from common law?
because the DTPA was intended to reduce the burden on consumers bringing action for deceptive shit, it got rid of the common law fraud requirements of having to show the D’s state of mind. so through DTPA you can recover ECONOMIC damages without a scienter requirement. however, other damages besides economic (like e.g. damages for mental anguish) are recoverable only if the P can show intentional conduct.
all prevailing consumers also recover reasonable attorneys fees under the DTPA
what are treble damages?
additional discretionary damages
what are the elements of a private cause of action under the DTPA? do not list out the types of actionable conduct
- P is a consumer
- D is engaged in conduct that is connected to the consumer transaction
- D engaged in actionable conduct [list on another slide]
- D’s violation was a producing cause; AND
- P suffered damages
one of the required elements of a private cause of action under the DTPA is that the D must have engaged in one or more forms of actionable conduct. what are the forms of actionable conduct?
- a violation of the DTPA’s list of acts or practices that are deemed deceptive (the “laudry list”)
- a breach of warranty
- an unconscionable action or course of action
- a violation of Insurance Code, Chapter 541–unfair or deceptive insurance practices
- a violation of a tie-in statute
what is the basic definition of “consumer” (element 1 of pvt. cause of action under DTPA)
a consumer is someone who SEEKS OR ACQUIRES, by purchase or lease, goods or services for use.
can an immediate reseller be a consumer?
yes
does a consumer need to be a natural person?
no, any entity, or the state of texas, or any political subdivision, can all be consumers
is there a privity requirement to be a consumer? like you do need to be in privity with the seller?
no. a consumer does not need to be the one who pursues or completes the transaction. as long as P is the INTENDED beneficiary of the product or service, he can still be a consumer under DTPA
is payment or consideration required to be a consumer?
no, a consumer need not complete the transaction in order to “seek” goods or services. as long as there is a GOOD FAITH intention of completing a purchase and the OBJECTIVE ability to complete the transaction, the consumer has standing.
how does DTPA define “goods and services”? remember definition of consumer is someone who seeks or acquires goods or services
both are broadly defined.
goods includes tangible goods. it DOES include real estate and DOES NOT include intangibles like stocks and bonds (so opposite of the UCC on both).
services include labor, insurance, and repair services. does NOT cover PURE LOANS (so a dude just going to bank to get a personal loan would not be a consumer) but DOES cover loans acquired in order to purchase a good or service.
many statuory exemptions to limit DTPA’s scope. list out the exemptions. will elaborate on other slides.
- large business consumers
- professionals
- media
- real estate brokers
- large transactions
- personal injury claims
elaborate on DTPA first statutory exemption: business consumers
the DTPA does not apply to business consumers (using the goods or services of business or commercial use) with ASSETS OVER $25,000,000
elaborate on DTPA second statutory exemption: pros
the DTPA does not apply to professionals when they are GIVING ADVICE, JUDGMENTS, OR OPINIONS. but the DTPA still applies if the professional makes an EXPRESS MISREPRESENTATION OF FACT.
elaborate on DTPA third statutory exemption: media
the DTPA does not apply to media defendants unless they have actual knowledge of the falsity of their act or practice.
elaborate on DTPA fourth statutory exemption: real estate brokers
the DTPA does not apply to real estate brokers or real estate salespersons unless they act UNCONSCIONABLY, or they EXPRESSLY MISREPRESENT or fail to disclose a MATERIAL fact.
elaborate on DTPA fifth statutory exemption: large transactions
the DTPA does not apply to transactions over $500,000 of consideration of no legal representation and transactions over $100,000 of consideration if represented by a licenced attorney
EXCEPTION: the consumer’s residence is not counted, so still a consumer if over 100k/500k transaction for residence
elaborate on DTPA sixth statutory exemption: personal injury claims
as a general rule, the DTPA does not apply to personal injury claims BUT medical expenses incurred or any lost wages suffered as a result of the personal injury are considered economic damages and can be recovered under the DTPA. So e.g. if you bought some bad product like tires for our unicycle and suffered personal injury, you can’t get recovery FOR THE PERSONAL INJURY ITSELF, but medical costs associated with the injury would be part of the ordinary economic damages.
what are the elements of a private cause of action under the DTPA again? do not list out the types of actionable conduct
- P is a consumer
- D is engaged in conduct that is connected to the consumer transaction
- D engaged in actionable conduct [list on another slide]
- D’s violation was a producing cause; AND
- P suffered damages
explain element 2 of the private cause of action under the DTPA: that the D is engaged in conduct that is connected to the consumer transaction
this is the easiest and most common sense element. it really is just what it says…that the D’s conduct is connected with the consumer transaction
recall element 3 of a private cause of action under DTPA: D was engaged in actionable conduct. what are the categories of actionable conduct?
- the “laundry list” (note: this requires reliance, not intent)
- breach of warranty
- violation of insurance code
- unconscionable action or course of action
- violation of a tie-in statute
recall that the first actionable conduct is the “laundry list” of violations. list 7 types of conduct on the laundry list
- facts - representing that goods or sevices have characteristics [notice, super broad], sponsorship, approval, ingredients, uses, benefits or quantities that they do not actually have.
- quality - representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model if they are actually of another
- contractual - representing that a contract or agreement confers or involves right, remedies, or obligations which it does not have or involve or which are prohibited
- silence - failing to disclose information concerning goods or services which was known at the time of the transaction if such failure was intended to induce the consumer into a transaction which the consumer would not have entered had the information been disclosed [obviously, it makes sense the the one about silence has a knowledge/intent requirement…it would be very unfair if you were held liable for not saying something you didn’t even know]
- repairs - knowingly making false of misleading statements of fact concerning the need for parts, replacement, or repair service
- warranty - warranty fraud. representing that a guarantee or warranty confers or involves rights or remedies which it does not have or involve
- work performed - representing that works or services have been performed on, or parts replaced, when the work or services were not performed or the parts were not replaced
threshold for laundry list misprepresentation to be actionable. it must be a misrepresentation of a _______
material fact. mere puffery is not enough
T/F. laundry list misrepresentations are actionable if the seller commits the misrepresentation; the consumer’s actual reliance does not matter.
F. For laundry list violations to be actionable, the consumer must have relied on the deceptive act to his detriment.
Recall there are 5 categories of actionable conduct. 1. laundry list of misprepresentations. 2. breach of warranty. 3. violation of the insurance code. 4. unconscionable shit. and 5. violation of a tie-in statute.
elaborate on 4, unconscionable shit.
unconscionable action or course of action is conduct that takes advantage of a consumer’s lack of knowledge, ability, experience, or capacity to a grossly unfair degree.
gross unfairness must be glaring, noticeable, flagrant, complete, and unmitigating.
can something be both a violation of a laundry list provision and an unconscionable act?
yes
Recall there are 5 categories of actionable conduct. 1. laundry list of misprepresentations. 2. breach of warranty. 3. violation of the insurance code. 4. unconscionable shit. and 5. violation of a tie-in statute.
give some examples of tie-in statutes
- the DTCA - texas debt collection act
- the home solicitations act - consumers solicited at home for over $25 are entitled to written K, specific disclousures, and right to cancel within 3 days
- texas business opportunity act - protects against deceptive practices in the advertising, offering for sale or lease, and sale or lease of business opportunties (franchises as defined by fed law do not count)
- health spa act
- manufactured housing standards act
- telephone solicitation act
the DTPA creates a set of new private warranties. T/F
F. it only takes the existing warranty law in Texas and brings it into the DTPA
for it to be an actionable violation for DTPA purposes, both express and implied warranties are counted. T/F
T. a breach of an express or implied warranty will allow a consumer to bring a cause of action under the DTPA
___ serves as the basis (i.e. legal source) of all warranties related to goods
the UCC, bitch
an express warranty is created by…
an express warranty is created by an affirmation of fact or promise to the consumer that becomes the basis of the bargain.
an express warranty does/does not need to be in writing.
does not.
a statement about the quality of a good may be considered a warranty, but for DTPA purposes cannot be part of both a breach of warranty and a laundry list violation.
F, bitch. a statement about quality or character of goods can be the basis of both a laundry list violation and an express warranty about those goods.
an express warranty can be created by a description of the goods or…
by a sample
an express warranty can only be excluded, limited, or modified if…
the limiting language is consistent with the express warranty
so this is FINE:
car salesman tells buyer that a car runs well and will run for at least 3 yrs. then the receipt says “no express warranty after 36 months”
this is is BAD:
car salesman tells buyer that a car runs well and will run for at least 3 yrs. then the receipt says “no express warranty”
the UCC gives three implied warranties for goods. list them.
- implied warranty of merchantability
- implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
- implied warranty of title
what is the UCC implied warranty of merchantability? when does it arise?
warranty that goods are fit for the ordinary purpose for which the goods are used. only arises when the sale of goods is by a merchant.
are used goods covered by the UCC implied warranty of merchantability?
a purchaser of used goods generally cannot sue the seller for a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability if the purchaser knows the goods are used. BUT the buyer MAY be able to sue the the MANUFACTURER if the implied warranty of merchantability was breached when the used goods first left the manufacturer’s possession (so breached while with the 1st purchaser)
the implied warranty of merchantability can/cannot be disclaimed
can.
how can the implied warranty of merchantability be disclaimed?
orally or in writing by specifically mentionaing the implied warranty of merchantability and, if in writing, by being CONSPICUOUS.
but there is safe harbor for conspicuous writing of “as is,” “with all fault,” or other similar lanaguage which in common understanding calls the buyer’s attention to the exclusion of warranties and makes plain that there is no implied warranty
the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose arises when:
- the seller has reason to know (i) the buyer’s particular purpose for the goods, and (ii) that the buyer is relying on the seller’s judgment; AND
- the buyer in fact relies on the seller’s skill or judgement to select suitable goods.
the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose can only be excluded or modified by…
conspicuous language in writing (not that, unlike the implied warranty of merchantability, this cannot be disclaimed orally)
T/F. unlike the implied warranty of merchantability, the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is not limited to merchants.
T
what is the implied warranty of title
the seller warrants that he owns and has the ability to convey ownership of the goods he is selling.
is there a requirement of privity between buyer and seller for all UCC warranties to arise?
under the decisions of Texas courts and under the UCC, privity is NOT required for warranties to arise under the UCC. that’s the reason why a downstream used buyer can still sue manufacturer. however, under the DTPA, there is stil a requirement that the DEFENDANT be connected with the transaction at issue in the cause of action.
the source of warranty law with respect to services is…
common law
how are express warranties with respect to services created?
an affirmation of fact or promise that becomes the basis of the bargain with respect to the services creates an express warranty.
there is an implied warranty as a matter of texas common law for services for repair or modification. what is the warranty and when does it apply?
it is an implied warranty that services for the repair or modification of existing tangible goods will be performed in a good and workmanlike manner.
applies only for repair or modifications of existing tangible goods, not a good to be created
the implied warranty for services generally DOES NOT apply to the performance of professional services (legal, medical, accounting, etc.)
the implied warranty with respect to services can/cannot be completely disclaimed by the seller
cannot be completely. however, it can be superseded by an express warranty