Community Property Flashcards
what is separate property
property OWNED OR CLAIMED by a spouse PRIOR to marraige
OR
property acquired during marriage by GIFT, DEVISE, OR DESCENT
what is the community property presumption?
how is it overcome (including who has burder)?
there is a presumption that the following three things are community property*:
- property acquired during marraige
- property purchased on credit during the marriage
- property possessed by a spouse upon cessation of marriage
The burden of proving that such assets are separate property is on the spouse attempting to rebut the community property presumption. The standard is CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE.
*If the spouse claiming that the property is community property did not participate in the transaction, no presumption is applied.
what is community property
any property acquired DURING MARRIAGE that is not separate property
earnings from employment during marriage, whether salary or bonus, is part of [a separate estate]/[the community estate]
the community estate
in the context of a bonus received through employment, what if part of the bonus was for work performed before marriage and part was for work performed after?
what if the bonus is purely discretionary (and therefore potentially NOT a property right)
split it up in proportion to before and after marriage
if discretionary, still split up proportionally
parties may alter by agreement the rule that salary/bonuses earned during marriage are part of the community estate. T/F
T
how are gifts between spouses treated?
when one spouse gives a gift to the other during the marriage, any income from the gift is PRESUMED to be SEPARATE property
how is income interest from separate property treated?
interest and dividends earned on SEPARATE property are COMMUNITY property based on the Texas rule of implied exclusion
(in other words, it is not in the defintion of separate property so by exclusion it is community property)
how do you treat an enforceable right acquired before marriage, but exercised during marraige?
it relates back to its inception, so is separate property
e.g., an option to buy property obtained prior to marraige but exercised during marraige.. the property, once obtains through the option, would still be separate property
what is tracing
if there is a presumption of community property, tracing can be used to overcome the presumtpion. you can trace property back to assets that were owned prior to the marriage.
e.g., you own a 20k tract of land before marriage. you get married and property value rises to 100k. then you sell the property and buy stock for 100k. the stock triples to 300k. ALL 300k would be separate property since it can ALL be traced to the 20k land (never mixed with any separate property).
what is comingled property
it is presumed to be ___ property
e.g., you buy land before marriage for 20k. you get married. land goes up in value to 100k. you sell the land and put it in an account that has 50k from income you earned during marriage. from that account, you write a check to buy stock for 100k.
the 100k is still considered comingled even though you can argue that it was actually the land sale proceeds you were depositing and then withdrawing. comingled property is PRESUMED to be community but the presumption can be overcome if property documented (see tracing methods on other slides)
what are the three tracing methods used to overcome the presumption that commingled property is community property (will elaborate on other slides)
- identical sum inference
- the community-out first doctrine
- lowest intermediate balance
tracing methods to overcome presumption that commingled property is community property: explain the identical sum inference method
identical sum inference is also called the clearning house method
arises when there is a deposit of separate property and the same amount is withdrawn shortly after
tracing methods to overcome presumption that commingled property is community property: explain the community-out first doctrine
this is a competing principle of the clearing house method.
the doctrine says that if there are community property funds in the account, there is a presumption that those funds are withdrawn first (and, if more is taken out than the total amount of community property, then separate comes out after the community property)
tracing methods to overcome presumption that commingled property is community property: how do you determine which principle to apply between the identical sum inference and the community-out first doctrine?
which principle to apply depends on the facts and INTENT of the parties
tracing methods to overcome presumption that commingled property is community property: what is the lowest intermediate balance principle?
also called minimum sum balance
When the balance of a bank account with commingled funds drops below the amount of separate funds deposited into the account, the lowest balance of the bank account between the time that the separate property was deposited and the time of the divorce is deemed the separate property portion of the bank account. Snider v. Snider, 613 S.W.2d 8 (Tex. Civ. App. 1981).
SEPARATE property placed in a commingled account “drop to the bottom” of the account. upon subsequent withdrawals, funds are first “taken from top” (i.e. community property) and new community property floats on top. separate is basically always last to go and stays at bottom. but the consequence of this is that, like previous para says, the lowest balance over the relevant period is still separate. the tracing method allows us to say “ok at least this much is separate”
what is the basic definition of reimbursement
it is the standard equitable remedy for when the efforts or funds of one marital estate benefit another without receiving a benefit of equal value or when funds are used to reduce unsecured debt. for example, the claim could arise when community funds are used to pay a separate debt or when separate funds are used to enhance community property.
discuss reimbursement claim offsets.
claims for reimbursement may be offset against EACH OTHER if the court thinks appropriate (i.e. claims that community benefited separate vs a distinct claim that separate benefited community for a different thing) . additionally, the BENEFITS for the use and enjoyment of property generally may be offset AGAINST a claim for reimbursement for expenditures to benefit that marital estate.
The party seeking an offset to a claim for reimbursement bears the burden of proof.
a reimbursement claim is subjec to EQUITABLE principles. what does this mean and what is an example
means that the court can consider factors outside of the specific transaction to get to to a fair result
e.g., baller husband making millions a year tries to get reimbursed by a small community estate. proves that he used separate income to pay a community credit card debt. judge is allowed to decide that, even though he proved a valid reimbursement claim, under principles of equity he will not honor the claim
some expenditures that are sometimes mistakenly argued to be reimbursable but are NOT subject to reimbursement
- Living expenses;
- Payment of child support, maintenance, and alimony arising from another marriage;
- Student loan payments; and
- Financial contributions toward a professional degree.
the proper measure of a reimbursement claim is the ___ of the benefited estate measured at…
enhancement
generally at the time of cessation of the marraige, whether by death or divorce
corporations, partnerships, and LLCs are considered…
the property within those entities are considered…
a single, separate entity
business property of the entity (so neither separate or community)
Rmr inception of title doctrine applies to options, including stock options. so if a stock is purchasd during marriage pursuant to a stock option whose inception traces back to before marriage, then it is counted as separate property.
what is shares are purchased pursuant to a subscription agreement using community property funds? should we follow the inception of title tracing doctrine?
property owned or claimed prior to marriage is separate property, even if later paid for by the community estate (this applies to options and subscription plans)
but note that there can then be a reimbursement claim
how are cash dividends from separate property stock treated?
cash dividends from separate community stock that are paid during marriage are COMMUNITY PROPERTY*
*exception for return of capital:
if the funds you are getting are not really income but a return of separate-property capital that you invested (e.g., a business started before marraige fails during marriage and you decide to cut losses and sell assets), then that is likely separate property
distributions that are earnings or profits are…
are royalties from minerals considered earnings or profits? so if you have separate property minerals that general some income during marriage, what are they considered?
community property
if the mineral interst is separate property, then all distributions from it except delay rentals are considered separate property (so this means think of mineral distributions more like liquidation or return of capital rather than income
what if some stock is separate property but company executes a stock split and you get extra stock. is that community or separate?
the extra shares are still separate property