Commercial Paper Flashcards
Bar exam approach
- Determine whether instrument is a negotiable instrument
- Determine whether instrument was property negotiated
- Determine whether instrument’s holder is a holder in due course
- Determine whether individual who is obligated to pay has any defenses against payment
- Determine whether those defenses are real or personal defenses
- Can the one who paid the instrument hold anyone else responsible?
Types of commercial paper and people involved
Two types: notes and drafts. Makers make notes and drawers draw drafts.
Note is ___ parties and draft is ___ parties.
two. three
Parties to a note
Maker - the person making the promise to pay
Payee - the person to whom the instrument is payable
What is a certificate of deposite
a specific type of note where the bank acknowledges receipt of money and promises the payee/depositor to repay the money
A draft is
an order to pay money
Parties to a draft
Drawer - dude ordering payment
Drawee - dude being ordered to pay
Payee - dude to whom the instrument is payable
Most common example of a draft
a check
With a check, the bank is the ___
drawee
checks are payable at specific date or on demand?
on demand
types of checks; defiinitions
ordinary check
travelor’s check - must be countersigned by a person whose “specimen signature” appears on the traveler’s check
cashier’s check - the drawer and drawee are the same bank
teller’s check - check drawn by one bank on another bank
if an instrument contains contradictory terms, then priority is
handwritten > typewritten
typewritten > printed
words > numbers
if item is not a NI, then article 3…
article 3 does not apply
requirements
formalities: in writing (not oral), signed by maker/drawer
payee’s duties: none, unconditional, cannot have conditions on payee
payor’s duties: must pay only fixed amuont money, nothing additional
timing: must be payable on demand or at definite time
def of writing
broad, just cannot be oral and must be reduced to tangible form
signed is
any symbol executed with the present intention to adopt/accept the writing
can a writing be subject to another agreement and still be considered unconditional?
no, it can refer to other writings, but cannot be subject to them. key to reference is it is only informational
a provision that payment must be from an identified fund does/does not make the instrument conditional
does not.
the requirment of a countersignature does/does not make the instrument conditional
does not.
if note is collatoralized, that does/does not make the instrument conditional
does not.
what does the requirmenet of being fixed amount of money mean?
just means the principal must be fixed. there can still be interest and that interest can be variable.
a NI must be either a ___ or ___ instrument; definitions
order or bearer
order instrument - payable to a specific person/entity
bearer instrument - generally payable to anyone in possesion
requirements of order instrument; examples
-specific formal words of negotiability
key phrases are “pay to the order of” or “pay x or his order”
big exception to requirement that order instrument have specific words of negotiatbility
checks; e.g. if a check says pay to the order of bo nugget but “to the order of” is crossed out, it is still a NI
is “i, ed, promise to pay francis 4k” a NI?
no, does not have key phrase
does a bearer instrument require words of negotiatbility?
no
examples of language to make bearer instrument
- payable to bearer
- payable to the order of bearer
- payable to cash
- payable to the payee (and line is left blank)
if a writing has characteristics of both an order and bearer instrument, then it will be treated as…
a bearer instrument
all NIs must be payable on demand or _______
at a definite time
definition of payable on demand
when the payee or holder can present the NI immediately after being issued the instrument
examples of typical NI that is payable on demand; example of typical NI payable at definite time
checks; notes
if NI is unclear about whether payable on demand or at definite time, then default is on demand (T/F)
F. To be considered a NI, must be clear about when $$$ due.
do acceleration clauses violate the requirement that NIs be due on demand or definite date?
Still a NI as long as the expiration date is still definite (not necessarily fixed, but unambiguously ascertainable. For example, you can have a conditional acceleration clause like “Andy owes Ted $50 on Dec 1, but if the Texas lose before Dec. 1, then Andy owes the $50 the day after they lose.
do extension options violate the requirement that NIs be due on demand or definite date?
Extension option to a definite date is always still NI. But open ended extension option is NI only if the extension option is only given to the holder, not the obligor.
Exceptions to rule that NI must obligate the obligor to pay money at a definite date and nothing else…. no other undertakings
Promises or undertakings concerning collateral will not affect status as NI; provisions that allow holder to procure judgement (e.g. “holder is hereby granted the authority to confess judgment against maker in court”)
what is issuance
the first delivery of an instrument
what is a negotiation
the transfer of possession, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, by a person other than the issuer to a person who becomes the holder
what is required to negotiate a bearer instrument
just change of possession
what is required to negotiate an order insturment
transfer of possession + indorsement of the instrument before transfer
what is a special indorsement vs blank indorsement.
special indorsement is when someone possesses a NI that is payable to them, and they indorse it as payable to someone else (e.g. promissory note says payable to Paul, and Paul signes the back with “pay to Harry /s/ Paul”), and then transfers to that person.
vs.
blank indorsement is when not made to specific person. just signs the back
what is a qualified indorsement
used to limit one’s liability on a NI (e.g. Paul is in possession of a NI that is payable to Paul. Paul takes note and indorses back with “Without recourse /s/ Paul”
what is a restrictive indorsement
used to limit what the holder can do with the instrument
invalid vs valid restrictive indorsement examples
e. g. of valid: “for deposit only /s/ Paul”
invalid: “for Harry if he mows my lawn /s/ Paul”
What happens if the indorsement is an invalid restrictive indorsement
Still a NI, but the restriction would be unenforceable (so would be payable even if condition is not met…bc rmr additional requirements are not allowed)
what is an anamolous indorsement
used by accomodation parties (discussed below)
what are indorsement requirements of order paper if there are multiple payees?
depends on whether payable jointly or severally. if jointly, all payees must indrose for valid negotiation. if severally, either pary can sign for negotiating
requriements for status as holder in due course
- must acquire holder status
- must pay value for the instrument
- good faith
- without notice of problems that might affect the obliger’s obligation to pay the instrument
what is def of paying value for the instrument (HDC requirement 2)
either give something of value, do something of value, or forgive something of value.
can person receiving gift NI be a HDC? (HDC requirement 2)
no, person receiving gift did not give anything of value, do anything of value, or forgive anything of value, so cannot be HDC
is a promise to perform something giving value for an instrument? (HDC requirement 2)
no, unexecuted promises to perform are not value but performed acts or performed promised acts are.
if you pay less than the note’s face value, is that still paying value for the instrument? (HDC requirement 2)
yes, value need not be full face value
what if you want to pay value for an instrument by paying x amount, but you have only partially performed? (e.g. you pay half on date of negotiation and half at a later date). can you have HDC rights? (HDC requirement 2)
for partial performance, you get partial HDC rights in proportion to amount paid.
two-part test for taking the instrument in good faith (HDC requirement 3); elaborate
honesty-in-fact + reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.
honesty-in-fact = what the dude receiving actually knew (e.g. did the clerk cashing the check actually know that the dude giving him the check was a con man who had just induced an old couple into giving it to him?)
reasonable comm. standards of fair dealing = what the dude receiving should have surmised given the context in which the instrument was negotiated (e.g. should the clerk cashing the check have surmised that this dude eager to offload the check for half the face value is prob presenting a fraudulently induced check?…a reasonable person would likely ask why)
what does it mean that a HDC must acquire without notice? (HDC requirement 4.)
Cannot acquire status as a HDC if the holder is aware of any reason as to why the legal obligation to pay the note may be compromised
Examples of what constitutes notice in HDC requirement 4.
can be actual notice, receiving through mail, or having reason to know there may be a problem