consequences of prejudice (and ways to reduce it) Flashcards

1
Q

consequences of prejudice for discriminated groups

A

internalization of stereotypes

attributional ambiguity

stereotype threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

internalization of stereotypes

A

When one privately accepts that descriptive stereotypes of one’s group is an accurate description of oneself

learning from others behaviour, and believing the stereotypes that are said about them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

clark doll experiments

A

study to see if children internalized stereotypes that black children are less smart, more mean etc..

showed that children internalized stereotypes

Clark did this to show how schools need to be de-segregated because stereotypes were strongest for children who attended segregated schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

heterosexual questionnaire

A

questionnaire asks heterosexual people same weird questions that LGBTQ people are asked

when you ask questions like “when did u know” they have an assumption of abnormality

asking these questions can contribute to stereotype internalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

process of internalization of stereotypes

A

people conform in their estimates

people use the behaviour of others to inform their behaviours and privately accept that the information is accurate
** conforming because they think others might be right

which is why informational social influence is very similar to the internalization of stereotypes if you are a person from an equity seeking group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

attributional ambiguity

A

difficulty interpreting feedback from others

uncertainty whether the feedback reflects their own performance or others’ biases

being a member of a stereotype group adds complexity to the reasons that people act towards you

negative feedback: did I do poorly or is the person giving feedback prejudiced

positive feedback: did I do well or is the person giving feedback being patronizing/compensating for their biases
– is the evaluator scared of looking racist/biased?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

attributional ambiguity study

A

when black participants are given positive feedback, makes them feel worse because think that it might be because the evaluator doesn’t want to seem racist

when they think the participant can’t see them and gives them good feedback – boosts self esteem

when black participants are seen and get negative feedback, it doesn’t really impact their self esteem because maybe they are being racist, but it has nothing to do with them, so the feedback is invalid

when can’t see them and get negative feedback it decreases their self esteem because they know they aren’t being mean because of racism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

tokenism

A

the practice of being inclusive to members of minority groups only to give the appearance of being inclusive

people may not get a boost to self-esteem for their achievements

self esteem boost is less guaranteed for minority groups
(maybe they promoted me because they don’t want to look racist)

strongest affect in feeling bad in response to good feedback is for people who are obese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

stereotype threat

A

Claude Steele was interested in why black people tended to underperform on aptitude tests

hypothesis: fears that one will confirm the stereotypes about one’s group interferes with performance, becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy

black people have to deal with stereotypes that they are less intelligent, so have the fear of confirming that stereotype

– same happens with women in stem, fears hinder performance and ends up confirming stereotype that men are better in stem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stereotype threat study

A

if black students are told that the test is diagnostic when it is, they do worse

when told that the test is not diagnostic (even if it is), they end up doing better because they don’t have to prove the stereotype wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

stereotype manipulations

A

telling the participants that the test is diagnostic or not

making people self report race or gender before taking a test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

making stereotypes salient (important)

A

female students who watched a tv commercial that was stereotypical, ended up doing worse on tests after because stereotypes are linked

threat that they will confirm stereotypes

after doing worse on test, reported less interest in careers requiring quantitative skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how can we reduce the negative effects of stereotype threat? (5)

A
  • not emphasizing social categories
    – moving from group testing to individual testing
  • self affirmation - has huge effect to boost self esteem
  • emphasizing incremental models of ability - if you show people that IQ can grow undermines the idea that you are restricted to the internalized stereotypes that you might have
  • learning about stereotype threat can reduce its effects
  • reframing the test – if you change what the test is diagnostic of, it can reduce stereotype threats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ways that prejudice affects non-group members

A

self-fulfilling prophecy

shooter bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the self-fulfilling prophecy

A

process by which your expectations about another person lead you to engage with them in ways that confirm those expectations

perceivers expectations –> perceivers behaviour towards target –> affects target’s behaviour to confirm those expectation

studied by seeing the way that interviewers interviewed black participants and measured speech errors and distance away from

then the confederates interviewed participants and copied distance and speech errors that happened when interviewing black participants, and these participants came out of the interview feeling worse than if they had been treated normally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

shooter bias

A

the tendency among police to shoot black civilians rather than white civilians, even when they are unarmed

IRL: unarmed+black are 3.5x more likely to be shot by police than unarmed+white

17
Q

shooter bias in the lab

A

data shows that participants are slower to not shoot unarmed black target vs unarmed white target

faster to shoot armed black target than armed white target

more mistakes for shooting unarmed black people

both black and white participants had shooter bias because of the stereotype that black people are dangerous

18
Q

factors that reduce shooter bias

A

amount of contact that the white participants had with black people

– suggestive that contact would help against prejudice

19
Q

ways of reducing prejudice

A

contact hypothesis

superordinate goals

20
Q

contact hypothesis

A

hypothesis that increased contact between members of various social groups can be effective in reducing prejudice between them

assumed that prejudice is because of ignorance

contact hypothesis motivated Supreme Court to de-segregate schools
* but this did not reduce stereotypes and prejudice because doesn’t mean that they became in contact with one another

21
Q

things that have to happen for contact hypothesis to work (5)

A

1) status equivalence
2) personal interaction
3) multiple out-group members
4) co-operative activities
5) normalize intergroup contact
– social norms need to favour intergroup contact

22
Q

superordinate goals
* robbers cave study and jigsaw classroom

A

the robbers cave study

group contact didn’t ease tension but staging situations for them to cooperate to achieve a goal did ease tension

the jigsaw classroom is another example
– social outcomes: more positive attitudes towards out-group
– academic outcomes: improvement for minority, no change for majority