Consent and confidentiality Flashcards
Consent- autonomy and paternalism
- Autonomy- self determination
- The ability to evaluate and deliberate
- The capacity to make decisions
- The freedom to act
- Paternalism- over-riding someones autonomy in their interest
- Who judges interest
- When is their sufficient reason for over-ride
Consent
- Consent is the voluntary and continuing permission of a patient to be given a particular treatment
- Based on a sufficient kknowledge of the purpose, nature likely effects and risks of that treatments
- Incluidnigthe likelihood of sucess and any alternatives to it
- Permission given under any unfair or undue pressure is not consent
- Consent of children under 16 valid if child
- Children 16-17 given same rights to consent as an adult under the family law reform act 1969 (note difference with refusal fro treatment)
Consent legal basis
- Trespass to the person
- Assault- a person threatens or attempts to physically injure another person and the injured party has reasonable fear that the treat will be carried out
- Battery- goes beyond a threat and the action is carried out (without consent)
- Can be (extreme cases) a criminal offence, or a civil case under the law of tort. Tort of negligence may be applied
- Battery could occcur when a health professional touches a patient without consent
- Legally consent is required for any action where apatient is touched
3 Elements of consent
- Sufficient information is given- so informed
- The consent is voluntary
- The patient has the capacity to understand that information (they are competent in law)
Explicit and implicit consent
- Written consent- often standard forms. Legally required for a few procedures
- Verbal consent- explicit within limits. Must make clear verbally what you intend to do “I’am going to take your BP”
- Just going to a doctor or hospital Doesn’t imply consent
-
Implicit consent- No written forms, no explicit words
- Based upon actions e.g. nod of the head, preparatory action (rolling up a sleeve for BP measurements)
What information is needed
- Patients need sufficient information before they can decide on whether to give their consent
- Patient standar- disclose what an average “resonable” patient with that condition would want to know
- Professional standard- set by health professional fallowing accepted standards
- If a patient asks a doctor about a risk, then the doctor is required to give an honest answer
Voluntary consent
- Consent must be given voluntarily
- Therefore not under any form of duress or undue influence from
- HCP, family or friends
- Consent can be withdrawn at any time
- Court may decide whether there is undue influence
Overriding cunsent
- 20-year old women injured in car accident when 34-weeks
pregnant. Rushed to hospital for emergency caesarean. - Baby still-born. Then patient develops abscess on lungs
but refuses treatment on religious grounds supported by
mother, devout Jehovah’s witness. Hospital went to court
- Judgment that refusal was not “free”.Does the patient
really mean what they say or is he saying it for a quiet life
or to satisfy someone else or because the advice and
persuasion to which he has been subjected is such that
he can no longer think or decide for himself
Capacity- competency
- Starting point is that a person has capacity
- Can the patient understand and retain the information provided
- Can the patient weight that evidence
- Can the patient come to a conclusion based on the evidence
- Can the patient communicate a decision
- Special case for children
Mental capacity act 2005
Dont confuse mental health act and capacity act
- A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that he lacks capacity
- A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him do so have been taken without success
- A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision merely because he makes an unwise decision
- An act done, or decision made under the act for or on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be done, or made in his best interest
New bodies and powers under the act
- Attorneys appointed under lasting powers of attorney
- Court of protection- with power to appoint deputies
- Independent mental capacity advocates
Limits of power
- No powers over decisions regarding family relationship
- Marriage, divorce or civil partnership
- Adoption or exercise of parental responsibility
- Sexual relations (but not vulnerable persons)
- Mental health act 1983- no power over a person detained under this act
- Voting rights
- Unlawful killing, assisted suicide
Life sustaining treatment
- What falls under definition up to doctor or healthcare practitioner
- Anyone deciding on such treatment must have no motive for individual’s death
- Must consider patient’s best interests and any evidence of patient’s view
- Withholding or removal of life sustaining treatment must consider patient’s best interest
The rights of children
- Declaration of Geneva 1924- mankind owes to the child the best it has to give
- Children recognised as persons who are entitled to the same human rights as an adult
- Legally binding
- Wide rangin- social, economic, political, civil
- Controversial- from liberationist to paternalist
Consent by minors
- Young person aged 16-17 have the competence to give consent for themselves but non-consent may be over-ridden
- England and Wales the family law reform act 1969& children’s act 1989
- Children U16 who understand fully what is involved in the proposed procedure can also give consent if judged competent. Interacts with confidentiality
- In other cases, someone with parental responsibility must give consent on the child’s behalf