consent Flashcards
r v barnes
participants of sports consent to injury within the normal risks of the game
r v jones
the court decided that a genuine mistaken belief in consent could be a defence
r v wilson
coa stated that branding was not unlawful even though it caused an injury
collins v wilcok
“unless explicitly withdrawn, handshakes and hufs are implicitly consented”
r v slingsby
vs consent meant that there was no battery and the d was not guilty
r v brown
how held that consent was not a defence to sadomasochistic acts done by homosexuals. even though they were all adults
pretty v uk
euthanasia is illegal In the uk consent can never be a defence to murder
hillock competence test
whether the victim has sufficient understanding and intelligence to give consent
Wilson v Pringle
implied consent is given to the ordinary jostling of everyday life
ag ref no.6
coa held that consent could not be a defence to s.47 abh or greater because it was not in public interest.
richardson and irwin
Clarke lj said that the question was not what another person would have foreseen/realised but what ds themselves would have known had they been sober. subjective
r v olugboja
coa stated that submission is not real consent
r v tabssum
the women’s consent was not true as they did not know what they were consenting to
r v dica
if you have an still you must tell your sexual partner
airedale nos v bland
if the discontinuance of medical treatment is In the best interests of the patient, then failure to act will not be a guilty act.
