Conflict of Laws Flashcards
On the exam, you should look for conflicts issues when the facts include _____
connections to multiple states.
+ Additionally, conflicts issues are usually combined with other subjects, especially family law, federal procedure, or torts.
There are two important but distinct testing areas for conflicts:
- Recognition of judgments; and
- Choice of law.
A recognition of judgments question may arise when two conditions are satisfied:
- A judgment has been entered by a court in one jurisdiction (rendering jurisdiction); and
- A party is seeking to have that judgment recognized by a court in a different jurisdiction (recognizing jurisdiction)
Reasons for a Party to Seek Recognition
- Plaintiffs will most often seek recognition in order to access enforcement mechanisms in the rendering state.
- Defendants will most often seek recognition to prevent a plaintiff from relitigating a claim or an issue.
Two categories of analysis for recognition of judgments
- Sister State
- Foreign
If the rendering court is a court in a sister state, then the source of the obligation to recognize the judgment is ____
constitutional (in other words, the Full Faith and Credit Clause applies).
By statute, full faith and credit principles also apply to the recognition of judgments between _____
federal courts and state courts.
Sister states = two steps or questions to ask:
- Are the requirements for full faith and credit satisfied?; and
- Are there any valid defenses?
Requirements that must be satisfied before the Full Faith and Credit Clause kicks in.
- Jurisdiction: The rendering state must have had jurisdiction over the parties (that is, personal jurisdiction) and jurisdiction over the subject matter.
- On the Merits: The judgment entered by the rendering state must have been on the merits.
- Finality: The judgment entered by the rendering court must be a final judgment.
Exception to jurisdiction requirement for full faith and credit
When the issue of jurisdiction has been fully and fairly litigated, the jurisdictional determination is itself entitled to full faith and credit.
Examples of judgments not on the merits include dismissals based on:
- Lack of jurisdiction (either personal or subject matter);
- Misjoinder;
- Improper venue; and
- Failure to state a claim (sometimes = depends on whether it was dismissed with/without prejudice).
On the merits requirements: Default and Consent Judgments
- A default judgment treats all factual contentions as admitted and is therefore on the merits for full faith and credit and recognition of judgment purposes.
- A consent judgment entered after settlement also is considered on the merits for purposes of recognition.
Requirement #3: Finality: The most common application here is a judgment _____, which is not final.
on appeal in the rendering jurisdiction
Orders that are ____ not final for _____ payment and enforcement
modifiable; prospective
What law applies when determining if the requirements of full faith and credit are met?
- Evaluated using the law of the rendering state.
- The law of the enforcing state governs the method of enforcement
The following are valid defenses to full faith and credit (high level):
- Penal Judgments
- Extrinsic Fraud
A penal judgment is one that ____
punishes an offense against the public.
-> In practice, this means that the plaintiff in the suit that led to the judgment was the state.
Extrinsic fraud is fraud that ____
could not be corrected during the regular course of proceedings leading to the judgment.
Attractive but invalid defenses to full faith and credit:
- Public policy.
- Mistake.
If the rendering court is a court in a foreign country, then the source of the obligation to recognize the judgment is ____
comity or treaty
Under principles of comity, a recognizing court will ____
exercise discretion to decide whether the foreign judgment should be recognized.
-> Many of the same principles as full faith and credit will be considered to guide the court’s discretion
Many of the same principles as full faith and credit will be considered to guide the court’s discretion (for example, is the foreign judgment final? Was the foreign judgment on the merits?).
But there are additional questions that a recognizing court may ask follow.
- Did the Foreign Court Have Jurisdiction?
- Were the Procedures in the Foreign Court Fair?
The foreign court must have had jurisdiction. The court has ____
greater leeway to assess jurisdiction than in the full faith and credit context (that exception to litigating the issue might not apply)
A choice of law question may arise when two conditions are satisfied:
- The lawsuit involves factual connections with multiple states; and
- The multiple states will have different laws leading to different
results.
Under choice of law questions the core question is: “Which state’s law will govern?” The core answer is:
The governing law is the law selected by the forum court according to its choice of law approach (assuming no applicable constitutional or statutory restrictions)