Agency and Partnership Flashcards
Agency is ______
- a fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (the “principal” appoints another (the “agent”) to act on the principal’s behalf and the agent consents to act.
- The agent must also act subject to the principal’s control.
Consent requirement for agency
- Consent of both the principal and the agent is necessary to form an agency relationship.
- Consent may be established expressly (through written or oral statements) or by implication from the parties’ conduct
On Behalf Of requirement of agency
This requirement is generally understood to mean that the agent must be acting primarily for the benefit of the principal, rather than for the benefit of the agent or some other party.
Control requirement of agency
The agent must act subject to the principal’s control, but the degree of control exercised by the principal doesn’t have to be significant.
The requisite level of control for an agency relationship may be found simply by the fact that ____
the principal has specified the task that the agent should perform, even if the principal hasn’t prescribed the details of how the task should be accomplished.
Not all ____ are necessary to create an agency relationship
contractual formalities
Principal Capacity Standard
- A principal must have contractual capacity.
- Thus, a minor’s appointment of an agent is voidable, and incompetents and most unincorporated organizations cannot be principals. (However, in many jurisdictions, partnerships and other organized business entities can be principals and appoint agents.)
Agent Capacity Standard
- Agent Needs Only Minimal Capacity
- While a principal needs contractual capacity, an agent doesn’t. So a person may be an agent even though they have no contractual capacity (Exception: If the agent has literally no mental capacity, they cannot act for the principal.)
Notice the different capacity requirements: A principal must have contractual capacity, but an agent need not.
Thus, a ____ can be an agent but not a principal.
minor
An agent may be disqualified for ____
representing both parties or failing to have a required license.
Formalities of agency relationship
- Consent of both parties is required.
- Writing (only if SOF requires, not required by agency law)
- (no consideration)
When is a writing required for an agency relationship
- Generally, agency law does not require the appointment of an agent to be in writing.
However, the Statute of Frauds may require one.
–> Many states require agency agreements to be in writing when the agent is to enter into certain contracts within the Statute of Frauds (mostly land transactions), or when the agency agreement itself would fall within the Statute of Frauds. This is called the “equal dignities” rule.
No _____ is necessary for the creation of an agency relationship.
consideration (one may agree to serve as an agent gratuitously and be saddled with the duties of an agent).
Modes of Creating Agency Relationship
The agency relationship may be created by an act of the parties or by operation of law.
Creating Agency Relationship - by Act of Parties
- Parties may create an agency by agreement between the principal and agent (that is, actual authority).
- Parties may also be bound in an agency relationship through holding out by the principal (that is, apparent authority), or ratification.
Creating Agency Relationship - By Operation of Law
- Estoppel: An agency may be created through estoppel. Estoppel is virtually the same as apparent authority in that it
requires third-party reliance on the principal’s communication. - Statute: Statutes creating agencies are usually designed to accomplish a limited purpose (for example, statute appointing secretary of state as out-of-state motorist’s agent for service of process for damages arising from driving in-state).
Agent’s Duties to the Principal (high level)
- Duty of Care
- Duty of Loyalty
- Duty of Obedience
Type of relationship of agent-principal
An agent (even an unpaid one) is a fiduciary of their principal.
Duty of Care
- An agent owes a duty to their principal to carry out their agency with
reasonable care. - The degree of care is a “sliding scale” depending on any special skills that the agent may have
–> While a gratuitous and
a compensated agent may owe the same duty of care, the measure of “reasonableness” may vary because compensation is a proper circumstance to consider (that is, courts will probably expect a gratuitous agent to put less effort into being careful than they would expect a paid agent to exercise).
Duty of Loyalty
The agent owes a duty of undivided loyalty to the principal. This includes the following obligations:
- An agent may not use their position as agent to profit for themselves = If they do, they must account to the principal for any profits made while carrying out the principal’s instructions.
- An agent must act solely for the benefit of the principal and not to benefit themselves or a third party.
- An agent must refrain from dealing with their principal as an adverse party or from acting on behalf of an adverse party.
- An agent may not compete with their principal concerning the subject matter of the agency.
- An agent may not use the principal’s property (including confidential information) for the agent’s own purposes or a third party’s purposes.
Duty of Obedience
An agent must obey all reasonable directions of their principal. If the agent disobeys a reasonable direction, the agent will be liable to the principal for any loss that the principal suffers.
Principal’s Remedies for Agent’s Breach of Duties
- The principal’s remedies against the agent include contract actions (against compensated agents), tort actions, actions for secret profits, equitable actions for an accounting, imposition of a constructive trust, and withholding of compensation for intentional torts or intentional breaches of fiduciary duty.
- The principal may also terminate the agency prior to any termination date in a contract.
The principal may recover the actual profits or properties held by the agent whether or not ____
the agent’s profit has caused the principal any loss.
When it comes to breach of fiduciary duty, note that a wide range of equitable remedies are available to a court. In general, a court can ____
do whatever it wants to “do justice” in the situation.
A subagent is ____
a person appointed by an agent to perform functions that the agent has consented to perform on behalf of the agent’s principal.
Employees of a single organization are presumed to be ____, not _____.
coagents; subagents
-> For example, manager and store clerk are coagents).
Not every person appointed by an agent is a subagent. An agent may also appoint a coagent (that is, another agent of the principal). In doing so, the agent does not _____.
delegate their own power to that person
Liability of Agent for subagent
An agent has absolute liability to the principal for breaches by a subagent.
Duties of agent for subagent
- If the principal authorized the agent to appoint the subagent, the subagent owes the principal the same duties as the agent owes the principal.
- If the agent was not authorized to appoint a subagent, the subagent does not owe duties to the principal but does owe duties to the agent
Principal’s Duties to the Agent
- The principal owes the agent all of the duties imposed by their contract, reasonable compensation, and reimbursement for expenses.
- The principal also generally should cooperate with the agent and not unreasonably interfere with the agent’s performance.
A principal’s duties to an agent are not ____ in nature.
fiduciary (fiduciary responsibilities run only from the agent to the principal)
If the agency agreement is silent regarding compensation, the agent is _____.
entitled to reasonable compensation.
A principal generally owes no duty to compensate a ____ even if ____.
subagent; the agent had authority to hire the subagent
Agent’s Remedies for Breach by Principal
A compensated agent has the usual contract remedies against the principal (but has a duty to mitigate damages).
In a typical real estate broker’s contract, the broker is entitled to
compensation when ____
there is a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase the property.
Types of Authority
- Actual Authority (express or implied)
- Apparent Authority
- Ratification
An agent has the power to bind a principal to a contract the agent enters on the principal’s behalf only if _____
the agent acted with authority.
Actual Authority
Actual authority is authority that the agent reasonably believes they possess based on the principal’s dealings with them
Types of actual authority
Express and implied
Express actual authority
Express authority is that which is actually contained within the four corners of the agency agreement. So it’s authority that’s conveyed by the principal in words (oral or written).
Express actual authority is effective even if ____
it was granted mistakenly or because of misrepresentation.
When determining whether an agent acted with authority in entering a contract for a principal, note that this is an ____ issue
all or nothing (they had authority or not)
Ex: if you bout 110 widgets and the agreement said they could only buy 100 = we would not say that this contract was partially authorized or partially unauthorized
Express Implied authority
Implied authority is authority the agent reasonably believes they have as a result of the principal’s words or actions.
Implied actual authority includes authority that is:
- Incidental to express authority
- Arising out of custom known to the agent
- Resulting from prior acquiescence by the principal
- To take emergency measures
- To delegate authority in cases of ministerial acts, where circumstances require, where performance is impossible without delegation, or where delegation is customary
- To pay for and accept delivery of goods where there is authority to purchase
- To give general warranties as to fitness and quality and grant customary covenants in land sales, collect payment, and deliver where there is authority to sell AND
- To manage investments in accordance with the “prudent investor” standard
The notion that ____ conveys implied authority can also be used to establish actual authority to the extent that ____.
title or position; the agent reasonably believes that they have authority to act based on the title or position given to them by the principal
Termination or revocation of actual authority occurs by:
- The happening of an event specified in the agent’s and principal’s agreement as something that will terminate the agent’s authority
- Lapse of a reasonable time if a time for termination is not specified in the agreement
- A change in circumstances, including destruction of the subject matter of the authority, insolvency of the agent or principal, and a change in the law or business conditions
- Agent’s breach of fiduciary duty
- Either party’s unilateral termination (both parties have the power to terminate an agency unilaterally, although such termination may constitute a breach of contract) OR
- Operation of law (for example, death or loss of capacity of either party except where a durable power of
attorney—written authority that says it will not terminate on the principal’s disability—is present. Termination in
the case of a principal’s death is effective only when the
agent has notice of it)
Termination in the case of a principal’s death is effective only when ____
the agent has notice of it
Irrevocable Agencies
- Neither an agency coupled with an interest nor a power given as security may be unilaterally terminated by the principal if the agency was given to protect the agent’s (or a third party’s) rights and it is supported by consideration.
–> Neither will such agencies be terminated by operation of law.
Apparent Authority - Basic Theory
Apparent authority exists when the principal “holds out” another as possessing authority and based on this holding out, a third party is reasonably led to believe that authority exists (even though as
between the agent and the principal, no such authority has been
granted).
The policy of apparent authority is that it protects innocent third parties who rely on ____
the principal’s holding out of a person as their agent.
Actual authority is based on the ____ manifestations (words or conduct) and how they affect the reasonable ____.
Apparent authority is based on the ____ manifestations (words or conduct) and how they affect the reasonable____.
principal’s; agent
principal’s; third party
Types of Apparent Authority (generally)
- When Agent Exceeds Actual Authority (prior act, power of position)
- When Agent Has No Actual Authority (Imposters, Lingering apparent authority)
- Inherent Authority (Inherent Agency Power)
When Agent Exceeds Actual Authority: Prior Act
Where the principal previously permitted the agent to exceed their express or implied authority and knows that the third party is aware of this, the principal is bound through apparent authority.
When Agent Exceeds Actual Authority: Power of position
- It is somewhat common for a third party to argue that an agent’s title or position, which was given to them by the principal, created a reasonable belief in the third party that the agent was authorized to act for the principal in ways that are typical of someone who holds that title or position.
- So, when the agent is in a position that customarily carries with it certain responsibilities, the principal is liable for the agent’s acts that come within these customary responsibilities.
When Agent Has No Actual Authority: Unilateral Agent Representations
- A principal generally will not be bound when the principal does nothing to hold the agent out as having authority and the only statement of authority comes from the purported agent’s claim they have authority.
- Apparent authority is based on the principal’s manifestations to a third party.
- Thus, apparent authority cannot be created by the mere representations of an agent or other actor.
Even though Unilateral Agent Representations don’t create apparent authority they may where ___
the beneficiary is silent in the face of A’s statement.
Apparent authority: Impostors
- Where the principal negligently permits an impostor to be in a position to appear to have agency authority, the principal will be held liable for the impostor’s actions undertaken with such authority.
- In other words, we’ll have an agency by estoppel–the principal will be estopped from denying the imposter was their agent.
Lingering Apparent Authority
Apparent authority can exist even when actual authority does not. Similarly, apparent authority can linger after actual authority ends.
Where an agent’s actual authority has terminated, he will have apparent authority to act on the principal’s behalf as to all third parties with whom the principal knows he dealt unless and until ____
the third parties receive either actual or constructive notice of the termination
Where an agent’s actual authority has been terminated but third parties rely on a written authority of the agent, the agent’s apparent authority is not considered to be terminated—unless _____
the principal recovers the written authority.
The majority view is that death or incompetency of the principal ___ automatically terminate the agent’s apparent authority.
does not
Inherent Authority (Inherent Agency Power)
Inherent authority is derived solely from the agency relationship and results in the principal being bound even though the agent had no actual or apparent authority to perform the particular act. This occurs because courts wish to protect innocent third parties rather than a principal who gave some actual authority to the agent
Examples of inherent authority include:
- Respondeat Superior: Under the doctrine of their employee committed within the scope of employment.
- Conduct Similar to that Authorized: Where an agent exceeds their actual authority (that is, violates orders), but the conduct is similar to acts authorized, the principal will be held liable
The principal will be held liable for the disposition of their goods by an agent possessing them if ____
the agent was given some indicia of ownership, or if the goods disposed of were sold by an agent who is a dealer in the particular goods.
An agency relationship is created by ratification when ____
an “agent” purports to act on behalf of a “principal” without any authority at all, but the “principal” subsequently validates the act and becomes bound.
Ratification gives the transaction _____ effect unless the “principal” lacked contractual capacity at the time the “agent” entered into the unauthorized transaction (in which case the “principal” is deemed to have “adopted” the contract), or unless
retroactivity would interfere with intervening third-party rights.
retroactive
Upon ratification, the “agent” is ____
relieved of liability for breach of
duty (see 2.1.1.d., supra) and their implied warranty of authority
Methods of Ratifying
- Ratification may be express or implied through the conduct of
the “principal.”
–> The most common form of express ratification is oral or written affirmation of a contract (for example, a company resolution).
–>The most common form of implied ratification is when the “principal” accepts the benefits of the contract.
–> Other ratifying conduct would include silence if there is a duty to disaffirm or suing on the transaction.
For ratification to occur, the “principal” must:
- Have knowledge of (or have reason to know) all material facts regarding the contract
- Accept the entire transaction (meaning the “principal” cannot merely ratify a portion of the transaction) AND
- Have capacity (be competent and of legal age)
Ratification is a ____ act of the “principal” and requires no consideration. Note also that ratification cannot be used to alter the rights of ____
unilateral; intervening parties (ex can’t ratify if another transaction has been entered into)
Generally, a “principal” may ratify anything unless:
(1) performance was illegal at the time of ratification,
(2) the third party has withdrawn, or
(3) there has been a material change in circumstances.
Under the Second Restatement (traditional view), which is followed by most states, an ____ “principal” may not ratify.
Only ____ or unidentified (existence of the principal is known, but the principal’s identity is withheld) “principals” may do so.
undisclosed (one whose existence and identity is withheld from the third party)
disclosed (existence and identity of the principal are known to the third party)
The modern view of the Third Restatement does not require the agent to purport to be acting on behalf of a “principal”; therefore, under the Third Restatement ____
“principal” may ratify.
any
A principal will be liable to the third party on a contract entered into by their agent if _____
the agent had valid authority (actual, apparent, or through ratification) to act
As a general rule, if the agent had actual authority or apparent authority to enter a contract for the principal, or if the principal ratified a previously unauthorized contract, the agent ____.
However, an exception applies if _____.
cannot be held personally liable on the contract
existence and identity of the principal are not disclosed
Agent Liability: Disclosed Principal
If the principal’s existence and identity are disclosed to the third party (a “disclosed principal” situation) the general rule is that the principal will be liable on an authorized contract and the agent will not be, the agent will be liable if the parties to the contract intended the agent to be liable.
Even if the principal’s existence and identity are fully disclosed, if the agent did not have authority to enter into the contract (so the principal will not be liable) the agent can be held liable to ____
the third party for damages for breaching an implied warranty that a principal with contractual capacity exists and that they, the agent, had authority to contract for the principal.
Agent Liability: Unidentified and Undisclosed Principals
If the principal is unidentified or if the principal is undisclosed either the
principal or the agent can be held liable on the contract if the agent
had authority to enter the contract.
- The majority of courts permit a
third party to file suit against both the principal and agent but, upon objection of either defendant, the third party must elect prior to judgment which party they wish to hold liable.
- On the other hand, if the third party obtains a judgment against the agent without knowledge of the principal’s identity, they can later sue the principal when their identity is discovered if the judgment has not been satisfied.
The type of principal (disclosed, unidentified, or undisclosed) is relevant only when you are considering whether the ___ is liable.
agent (Do not discuss the type of principal when analyzing the principal’s liability = Any type of principal will be bound as long as the agent had authority.).
When the principal is disclosed, only the ____ may enforce the contract and hold the third party liable.
principal, not the agent,
When the principal is unidentified or undisclosed, the ____ may enforce the contract and hold the third party liable.
principal or agent (if the agent enforces the contract against the third party, the principal is entitled to all of the rights and benefits thereunder).
The principal may not enforce the contract against a third party if _____
there has been an affirmative fraudulent misrepresentation of the principal’s identity or if there is an unforeseen increased burden to the third party due to the fact that performance is due to the principal and not the agent.
A principal may be vicariously liable for the torts of their agent under two theories:
(1) respondeat superior and
(2) apparent authority.
Vicarious liability means that ____
joint and several liability for the agent’s tort will be imputed to the principal
The derivative nature of this
liability (respondeat superior) means that if the agent isn’t liable, the principal generally can’t be held liable; however, an agent’s immunity from a lawsuit _____
does not necessarily bar recovery from the principal.
Note that in addition to vicarious liability, a principal may be directly liable for ____
- Their own negligence in hiring, retaining, or supervising the agent
- For an agent’s tort if they gave the agent actual authority to commit the tort or ratified the tort, or in other circumstances involving independent contractors
A principal can be liable for the torts of an agent under ___
the doctrine of respondeat superior (“let the master answer”)
The first step in determining a principal’s tort liability is to determine whether _____. And why?
there an employer-employee relationship between the tortfeasor and the principal.
Why = Under the doctrine, an employer (formerly called a master) is liable for the torts of an employee (formerly called a servant) committed within the scope of the employment. A principal generally is not liable for
torts committed by an independent contractor.
The difference between an employee and an independent contractor is that ____
the principal/employer retains the right to control the manner in which an employee performs their work.
-> A principal does not reserve/have a right to control the manner in which work is performed by an independent contractor.
For respondeat superior If it is not clear whether the principal has the right to control the method and manner of the work, consider:
a) The degree of skill required on the job (where great skill is required, more likely to be independent contractor)
b) Whose tools and facilities are used (if the principal supplies the tools and facilities used to perform the job, more likely to be employee)
c) The period of employment (definite and/or short, more likely to be independent contractor; indefinite and/or long, more likely to be employee)
d) The basis of compensation (if on time basis, more likely employee; if on job basis, more likely independent
contractor)
e) The business purpose (if person hired to perform an act in furtherance of principal’s business, more likely employee; if nonbusiness purpose, such as mowing a lawn, more
likely independent contractor)
f) Whether the person has a distinct business (person who has their own business or occupation is more likely to be an independent contractor)
g) The characterization and understanding of the parties
h) The customs of the locality regarding supervision of work
The employer is liable for the employee’s torts only if ___
they were committed within the scope of the employee’s employment.
Three factors helpful in making the assessment if the employee was acting within the scope of their employment:
- Was the conduct “of the kind” that the agent was hired to perform?
- Did the tort occur “on the job” (that is, within the time and space limits of the employment)?
- Was the conduct actuated at least in part to benefit the principal
To be within the scope of employment, the employee’s conduct need not be actually ____. Nor does ____ by the principal necessarily remove the conduct from the scope of employment.
If the nature of the employee’s conduct is ____ to that which was authorized, the conduct is probably within the scope of employment.
authorized; prohibition
similar or incidental
Serious criminal acts are normally considered to be ____
outside the scope of employment.
Frolic and Detour
Detour: small deviation from the employer’s direction is within the scope of employment
Frolic: major deviation requiring a substantial departure from employment is beyond the scope.
-> Once it is shown that the employee has left the scope of employment, there must be proof of return before the employer will be held liable for the employee’s tort.
Finally, consider whether the employee’s conduct was actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to ____
serve the employer.
The employee’s invitation to ____, unless expressly authorized by the employer, is generally held to be outside the scope of the employment relationship, and the employer would not be held liable for injuries sustained.
passengers
The employer is not liable for torts caused by the use of _____ instrumentalities from those authorized
substantially different (that is, those creating a greater risk of harm).
If the employee makes a trip with two purposes, it will be within the scope of employment if ____
any substantial purpose of the employer is being served.
The general rule is that the employer is not liable for the ____ torts of an employee.
intentional (for example, battery or assault).
Intentional torts will be viewed as within the scope of employment if the conduct is:
(1) a natural incident of the employee’s duties (as where force is authorized or the nature of the work gives rise to hostilities);
(2) where the employee is promoting the employer’s business or is motivated to serve the employer; or
(3) specifically authorized or ratified by the employer.
A principal is liable for an agent’s misrepresentations (including intentional misrepresentation) if _____
the agent had actual, apparent, or inherent authority to make statements concerning the subject matter involved
Liability for Acts of Borrowed Employees
The key issue is who has the primary right of control over the employee—the loaning principal or the borrowing
principal? That employer is liable.
Every person is liable for their own torts. Thus, an employer is liable
for ____
their own negligence if they fail to properly train or supervise employees or independent contractors, or fail to check an employee’s or independent contractor’s criminal record or job history.
The doctrine of respondeat superior also applies to duly authorized ____.
subservants
Authorization to hire subservants can be ____
express or implied.
-> Implied authorization can arise from: past practices, emergency situations, or a reasonable necessity to achieve an authorized result.
However, the employer is generally not liable for the torts of a subservant engaged ____
without authority.
Employer-Employee by Estoppel
Where a principal creates the appearance of an employer-employee relationship upon which a third party relies, that principal will be estopped from denying the relationship and will be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
Ex: A hospital advertises “Our doctors are the best,” but the doctors at the hospital are actually independent contractors. If one of the doctors negligently injures a patient, the hospital might well be estopped from denying the doctor was an employee.
A principal will incur liability for the acts of an independent contractor where:
(1) inherently dangerous activities (such as blasting) are involved,
(2) nondelegable duties have been delegated, or
(3) the principal knowingly selected an incompetent independent contractor
(if the principal was merely negligent in selecting the independent contractor, the principal is liable only for their own negligence in selection, not for the contractor’s negligence).
If respondeat superior does not apply, the principal may still be vicariously liable in certain circumstances if ____
the agent acted with apparent authority.
A principal is vicariously liable where an agent appears to deal or communicate on behalf of the principal and the agent’s apparent
authority enables the agent to
(1) commit a tort or (2) conceal its
commission.
-> This means that for the principal to be liable, there must be a close link between the agent’s tortious conduct and the agent’s apparent authority.
Summary: Is a principal liable to a third party on a contract entered into by an
agent?
a. Did the agent have actual or apparent authority at the time of the contract, or did the principal ratify the contract later?
b. If so, the principal is liable on the contract (but usually, the agent is not).
Summary: Is an employer liable for a tort committed by an employee?
a. Was the tort committed by an employee in the scope of employment?
b. If so, the employer (master) and employee (servant) are jointly and severally liable to the third party.
A partnership is ____
an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit.
-> It’s formed as soon as that happens, regardless of whether the parties subjectively intend to form a partnership.
Remember that there must be at least two persons involved in forming a partnership. A partnership may not exist with only one partner. But also remember that a “person” may be _____
an individual, trust, corporation, partnership, or
other entity.
Since no formalities are required to form a partnership, it’s sometimes difficult to determine whether the relationship between parties is a partnership or something else. To determine whether a partnership exists, courts generally look to _____
the intent of the parties.
-> If they intended to carry on a business as co-owners, there is a partnership even if they did not subjectively intend to be partners.
Factors For Deciding Whether Partnership Exists = Factoss that raise a presumption of partnership status
- Sharing of Profits Raises Presumption of Partnership
- Right to Participate in Control
The following factors may be additional evidence that a partnership has been formed. However, in contrast to the sharing of profits, these factors do not raise a presumption of partnership:
a) Title to property is held in joint tenancy or in common
b) The parties designate their relationship as a partnership
c) The venture undertaken by the parties requires extensive activity
d) Sharing of gross returns
The most important factor in deciding whether an association rises to the level of a partnership is the sharing of profits. Sharing of profits raises a _____ unless the share was received as ____
presumption of partnership
payment of a debt, as wages or compensation for services rendered, as rent payment, as an annuity or other retirement benefit, as interest on a loan, or for the sale of goodwill of a business.
If there is profit-sharing, and therefore a presumption of partner status, one can try to rebut that presumption with evidence suggesting ____
the lack of a co-ownership relationship, such as no
right to control or no sharing of losses (something that owners would typically share).
Writing Requirements to forma partnership
No writing is required to form a partnership. However, because of the Statute of Frauds, if partners wish to have an enforceable agreement to remain partners for more than one year, they generally must execute a writing reflecting their agreement.
Partnership By Estoppel
If no partnership was formed in fact, parties may still be liable as if they were partners to protect reasonable reliance by third parties.