Conceptualizations Of Human Behaviour Flashcards
Why is there a focus on the deficit view? (Positive-negative asymmetry effect, fundamental negative bias, fundamental attribution error)
- Positive-negative asymmetry effect: Negative stim and info are more likely to capture our attention
- Fundamental negative bias: When a behav stands out, is considered negative, and occurs in vague context; we tend to make dispositional attributes
- Fundamental attribution error: Tendency to believe that other people’s behavs are caused by dispositional attributes rather than situational
Criteria used to determine whether behaviour is problematic (4)
- Why are none necessary or sufficient on their own
- Atypicality (frequency): Just bcuz something is rare, doesn’t mean it’s bad (like talent)
- Maladaptive (function): Just bcuz behav violates norms doesn’t mean it’s bad; depends on the context
- Psychological distress (effects): There are disorders that involve lack of stress (like bipolar disorder and mania)
- Impairment in functioning: Someone may have disorder but still be high functioning in most environments
What are the ways the DSM has tried to improve distinguishing typical and problematic behav? (4)
- More inclusive language
- Development, course, cultural consideration sections
- Cultural formulation interview (allows clinician to understand patient’s cultural background, language, and other cultural considerations)
- Dimensional models
Jahoda’s 6 characteristics of a mentally healthy person
- Personal attitude towards self including self-acceptance, self-esteem, accuracy of self-perception
- Pursuit of one’s potential
- Focused drives that are integrated into one’s personality
- Identity and values that contribute to sense of autonomy
- World perceptions that are accurate and not distorted because of subjective needs
- Mastery of enviro and enjoyment of love, work, play
Four-Front Approach by Wright
- The 4 pieces of info to gather
- What does it consider
—
VIA system by Peterson
- Ppl may exhibit what (4)
- Mental health difficulties may stem from what
—
Ivey & Ivey’s developmental counselling and therapy
- Uses what conceptualization
- Pathological behavs are what kind of response to life events
- What do they suggest
1) Deficiencies and undermining characteristics of the person
2) Strengths and assets of the person
3) Lacks and destructive factors in the environment
4) Resources and opportunities in the environment
- Considers the individual’s perspective on their own strengths and deficits, which allows for a more culturally competent understanding
—
1) Right amount of strength
2) Opposite of strength
3) Absence if strength
4) Exaggerated version of strength
- May stem from underusing or overusing strengths
—
- Here-and-now conceptualization
- Logical responses to life events
- Take small steps to account for positive and negative functioning + Change language for describing client functioning (Ex: What is not working vs What is working?)
Primary vs Secondary prevention
Primary vs Secondary enhancement
Primary: Before problem appears
Secondary: After problem appears
—
Primary: Establish optimal functioning and satisfaction
Secondary: Sustain and build upon already optimal functioning and satisfaction
Heller et al.’s 5 suggestions for successful implementation of primary prevention
- Head Start
- Caveats of primary prevention (3)
- Give targeted populations knowledge about risky behav to prevent
- Program should be attractive (let ppl know benefits)
- Program should teach problem-solving skills and how to resist regression
- Provide social support and approval
- Ongoing evaluation of effectiveness
— - Focuses on poor children; provide them w/ lvl of preparation similar to what more advantaged peers experience
- Includes educational supports, nutritious meals, medical screenings, parental training
- BUT positive results not seen in all groups bcuz there’s lack of diversity (only focusing on impoverished of majority group instead of minority)
— - Illusion of uniqueness (belief that good things will happen to them and bad things will happen to other ppl)
- Hard to convince ppl program is worth it
- Takes a while to examine results
Common components of secondary prevention (3)
- Caveats (3)
- Bandura’s self efficacy model (4)
- Seligman’s attributional retraining (ABCD)
- Hope therapy
- Hope is underlying process
- Pathways and agency thinking
- Gol-focused positive psychotherapy (working w/ clients to set goals and figure out how to achieve + give belief that they can)
— - Problems w/ seeking and sticking w/ therapy
- System not always effective when treating individuals from minority
- Lack of research on minority groups
—
BANDURA:
Clients learn efficacy beliefs thru: - Actual performance accomplishments in the problematic area
- Modelling another person who’s coping effectively
- Verbal persuasion by the helper
- Controlling negative cognitive processes by learning to implement positive moods
—
SELIGMAN: - Adversity (event), Belief (maladaptive beliefs caused by event), Consequence (symptoms result from maladaptive beliefs), Disputation (challenge beliefs to change it into more adaptive ones to change consequences)
—
HOPE: - Similar as Seligman’s but increases hopeful thinking NBC
Ways to encourage primary enhancement (3)
Lyubomirsky, Sheldon & Schkade’s positive activity model
- Meditation
- Savouring (appreciating positive exps)
- Therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC) (ex: getting more healthy lvls of sleep or exercise)
—
Deliberately practicing simple, intentional, and regular activities meant to mimic healthy thoughts, behavs and goals of happy ppl can boost happiness - How often/when activities done and personality traits may impact how much they boost us
Lomas’ LIFE model
- Dimensions
- Examples
Way to classify types of positive psych interventions
- Scales of subjective-objective and collective-individual
- Thoughts and feelings (ex: gratitude): Subjective, individual
- Relationships (ex: family counselling): Subjective, collective
- Physiological outcomes (ex: exercise): Objective, individual
- Systems, laws (ex: public health campaigns): Objective, collective