Conceptual understanding Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are concepts

A

Internalised, abstract representations of objects and events which are more than sensory perceptual representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between old and new perspectives on concepts?

A

Old: = symbolic representations which are discrete and all or nothing: you either have it or you don’t

New: = distributed representations which are refined with incremental experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name 2 processes underpinning conceptual development

A

1) categorisation: judging an exemplar as a category member on the basis of perceptual and relational (structural) similarity, which allows us to predict its behaviour
2) inductive learning: generalising traits from a known (e.g. prototype) to novel exemplar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do we test for the presence of concept building mechanisms?

A

Habituate to exemplars of category X. Test the ability to discriminate between a novel exemplar of the same category and a novel exemplar of a different category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is statistical learning involved in concept development?

A

In calculating conditional probabilities e.g. what is the probability that x is a bird, given it has wings?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the basic level of categorisation?

A

The level at which the world is naturally categorised for us by its perceptual features. Basic level concepts are correlated with these features e.g. cars tends to have 4 wheels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why does the basic level have the greatest psychological utility?

A

Because we get the most conceptual info with the least cognitive effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are prototypes?

A

Highly typical basic-level concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Do 3m distinguish between basic-level categories? How did Arterberry & Bornstein (2001) test this?

A

Yes when either motion or just perceptual cues to category membership are available

Habituation to point-light displays of exemplars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

To test whether knowledge of perceptual prototypes is actually conceptual, we need to apply 3 measures to preverbal children. These are:

A

1) sequential touching: do children prefer handling objects which are in the same category as other items in the sequence?
2) object manipulation: how long do children spend manipulating a different vs. same category object?
3) matching-to-sample: do children match the 2 same-category items out of the 3 presented?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can superordinate categorisation be conducted using perceptual cues only? At what age can children categorise at the superordinate level: 12, 15 or 20m? Mandler & Bauer (1988) using sequential touching

A

No e.g. perceptual cues do not distinguish horse/ spider (animals) vs. plane/ motorbike (vehicles) but do distinguish poodle/ collie (dogs) vs. volkswagen/ beetle (cars). 20m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Pauen (2002) use object manipulation to show that perceptual dividers of basic level categories disrupt superordinate categorisation ability? At what age is this ability revealed when such interference is removed?

A

Familiarisation: manipulated one set of objects matched by shape to the other set (animals vs. furniture). Test: removed perceptual differences between the two stimuli shown. Finding: 11m manipulated the novel superordinate category for longer, despite its familiar shape = conceptual, not perceptual, categorisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Did 19m, 25m and 31m succeed at matching-to-sample at the basic and superordinate levels? (Bauer & Mandler, 1989)

A

Yes, all succeeded at all levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does categorisation depend on perceptual or relational similarity?

A

Rosch: both: perceptual similarity correlates with and so is a guide to deeper structural similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which dominates when perceptual similarity is pitted against structural similarity in categorisation? What was the procedure of Gelman & Markman (1986, 1987)?

A

Relational similarity. 3 & 4y shown picture of a target category e.g. cat. Then asked ‘can [new image] see in the dark if the cat can?’. The new image was of a same/ different category member with similar/ dissimilar appearance to the target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Do 3 and 4y know self-generated movement as a trait tends to distinguish biological entities from non-biological artifacts? What was the procedure of Massey & Gelman (1988)?

A

Yes. Asked 3 and 4y whether object or animal x, y or z could move up and down a hill by itself? = very accurate

17
Q

Do 3y and 5y know that growth as a trait tends to distinguish biological kinds from non-biological kinds? What was the procedure of Rosengren (1991)?

A

Yes. 3y and 5y shown a new object or baby animal and asked whether x or y depicted one which had been around for a very long time. Chose the entity which had changed size only for animals, not objects

18
Q

Do 3, 4 and 5y know biological kinds and nonbiological kinds can be categorised by their internal structure? What was the procedure of Simons and Keil (1995)?

A

3, 4 and 5y shown pairs of artifacts or natural kinds with mechanical or biological internal structures. Asked which was correct. = accurate & MORE so for NKs (natural kinds)

19
Q

Do 4-5y children categorise NKs and artifacts by shared functions to the same extent? What was the procedure of Pauen (1996)?

A

No, 4-5y asked to pair items, all of which had the same function e.g. were hanging. 1st matched biological & artifact pairs. Expert arrived & said one pair must be separated. = more willing to separate biological pairs according to perceptual differences = categorising by shared function is more important for artifacts

20
Q

What is the difference between characteristic and defining features?

A

CFs are typically associated with a concept

DFs are always associated with a concept

21
Q

Do 5y vs. 9y categorise by characteristic features or DFs? Why?What was the procedure of Keil and Batterman (1984)?

A

5, 7 and 9y given a defining feature story (stole but not your typical robber) or a characteristic feature story (typical robber but took with permission). 5y categorised using CFs vs. 9y categorised using DFs. Because we need experience to identify the correct DF

22
Q

NKs vs. artifacts are categorised principally by shared structure vs. function - true?

A

Yes