COMPS:PT Mgmt of Pts w/ Hip and Knee OA--ZENI Flashcards
OA is a ________ process
*NOT just wear and tear
Disease process
Defining Knee OA radiographs
Kellgren Lawrence Scores*
4 Grades
Graded 0 (none)
to
Grade 4 (severe)
Defining Knee OA
Kellgren-Lawrence Scores
Grade 0 (NONE)
- Grade 0== NONE
- definite absence of x-ray changes of OA
Defining Knee OA
Kellgren Lawrence scores
Grade 1 (Doubtful)
- Grade 1 == doubtful
- doubtful jt space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping
Defining knee OA
Kellgren Lawrence Scores
Grade 2 (minimal)
- Grade 2== minimal
- definite osteophytes and possible jt space narrowing
Defining Knee OA
Kellgren Lawrence Scores
Grade 3 (Moderate)
- Grade 3== moderate
- moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of jt space and some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone ends
Defining Knee OA
Kellgren Lawrence Scores
Grade 4 (severe)
- Grade 4== severe
- Large osteophytes, marked narrowing of jt space, severe sclerosis and definite deformity of bone ends
Uni or Multi-compartmental disease @ the Knee
- Medial
- Lateral
- Patellofem
SEE pics !!!

Advanced OA Knee
see pics

Defining Knee OA–Clinical Presentation
The Cardinal Signs
Age
Brief AM stiffness
Crepitus
Tenderness
Bony abnorms
NO warmth
Defining Knee OA–clinical present.
ACR Clinical definition
PAIN IN THE KNEE PLUS @ least 3 of the following:
- Pain in the knee + 3 of following:
- >50yo
- <30 mins morning stiff.
- crepitus w/ active motion
- bony tenderness
- bony enlargement
- NO palpable warmth of synovium
NOTE: some studies show that these criteria reflect later stage disease and may not capture indiv’s w/ EARLY or MILD OA****
2 scales common in grading HIP OA
- KL Scale
- Tönnis Classification
see below for Tönnis

In a nutshell….. Tönnis Scale of HIP OA
- 0
- NONE
- 1
- mild
- minor
- No or minor
- 2
- moderate
- moderate
- moderate
- 3
- Severe
- Severe
- Severe

Defining HIP OA—clinical present:
Very high likelihood of Hip OA w/ 4 out of these 5 present:
- Self-reported squatting as an aggravating factor
- Active hip flexion causing LATERAL hip pain
- Scour test w/ ADD. causing lateral hip OR groin pain
- Active hip EXT causing pain
- passive IR of LESS THAN or EQUAL to 25deg
OA is more than just cartilage loss
Jt swelling, bursa inflammation, changes to synovial fluid and jt capsule
see pics

OA is more than just cartilage loss
Mm atrophy, weakness, morphological changes
ex. fat permeating into jt
see pics

OA more than just cartilage loss
Cartilage deterioration (X-ray) and Morphological changes (MRI)
see pics

OA more than just cartilage loss
Osteophytes, thickening of subchondral bone, Bone Marrow lesions (MRI)
see pics

OA cannot _________
CANNOT be considered a disease of ONLY the articular cartilage!!!
Activation Deficit

Prominantly in OA
- Diff AFTER electrical stim vs. what pt can do volitionally
- neurological system cannot fullt activate ALL mm’s in a region
**Quadriceps Lag**

Mvmt patterns and motor control also change
Asymmetrical and abnorm biomechanics
Favoring the Good side
For Knee…
Stiff legged gait pattern
CARDINAL SIGN
Mvmt patterns and motor control also change
Asymmetrical and abnorm biomechanics
Favoring the Good side
The Hip….
Lateral and forward trunk lean TOWARD GOOD SIDE
DECd hip EXT ROM
CARDINAL SIGN HIP OA
Lat. trunk lean w/ walking TOWARDS AFFECTED SIDE
Mvmt patterns and motor control changes
Knee OA
co-contraction vs. muscle timing
INC’D co-contraction
ALTERED mm timing

Alignment changes, Jt Load changes
Knee OA
What is the pattern?
Malalignment==> Altered Loading==>Cartilage Loss==>Malalignment

Valgus vs. Neutral vs. Varus Radiographs
-
More cartilage loss==
- worse alignment becomes
-
Worse alignment becomes==
- more abnormal forces become
-
More abnormal forces become==
- more cartilage is lost

Phys. impairments lead to _________
Functional Deficits
- Ex. OA vs. Control group
- TESTED:
- Age
- KOS-ADLS
- TUG
- SCT
- Quad Strength (Op)
- Nearly 50% reduction in KOS, TUG, SCT and Quad strength
- TESTED:
In a nutshell….
The Cycle
Injury (ACL, fx), Bony deformity, Weakness, Unfortunate genetics ======>
- Joint pain==> Decd phys act==> muscle weakness==> abnormal biomechanics==> cartilage loss and jt laxity==> Joint pain
- Over the span of 5-20 yrs
-
Drs usually say
- ”come back when nothing else works and you can’t take pain anymore”
Primary OA
*usually older pop.
- Disease is of idiopathic origin (no known cause)
- Usually affects mult. joints
- Elderly pop
Secondary OA
*monoarticular
- Monoarticular
- develops as result of defined disorder affecting jt articular surface (ex. trauma) or from abnormalities of joint
Secondary OA
Hip
- Dysplasia
- SCFE
- Fx
- FAI
- Avascular necrosis
Secondary OA
Knee
- Trauma
- chondral lesions
- ACL injury
- Fx’s
Radiographic DOES NOT always match sx’s
Do NOT emphasize structure
Emphasize Function!!
- DO NOT SAY:
- Bone-on-bone
- end-stage
Certain descriptors of OA make pts feel:
- Jt is susceptible to damage
- OA will inevitably get WORSE
- TKA is only option and cond. is irreversible
- Doing more exercise or activity will damage the joint
ALL WRONG!!!
OA is a serious cond. and needs to be approp. mg’d, NOT just put off until TKA
INCd risk of CV disorders, morbidity, mortality
Key Points:
OA Patho.
- OA==more than just a disease of cartilage
- OA is a chronic cond and must be tx as such
- Pts. develop asymmetrical mvmt patterns
- Reduce demand on operated limb and INC reliance on the non-affected side
- Result of pain, weakness, laxity
- which came first???
- Pts w/ hip and knee OA develop behaviors in response to PAIN
Risk factors for OA development and progression
What are some ex’s?
Phys activity and risk
ROM deficits
Muscle control deficits
Dynamic frontal plane alignment
Injury Type vs. Risk of Developing OA compared to an uninjured group
Basically…. based off of previous injury type, what is your risk (likelihood) of developing OA?
see pics

Phys activity and risk for Knee OA
what factors INC risk for OA?
-
Previous injury
- see previous chart
Phys activity and risk for OA
Not all meniscal injuries have same risk!
- Medial extrusion, complex tears, large radial involvement were more common in those who develop OA***
Sports and risk for OA
Sports are generally NOT a risk factor
Exceptions:
- Soccer
- 3.5x INC risk
- Elite lvl long dist running
- 3.3x INC risk
- Competitive wt lifting
- 6.9x INC risk
- Wrestling
- 3.8x INC risk
- For those w/out history of injury– soccer and Am football had INCd risk of OA
Vocation and risk for OA
- Kneeling or squatting
- 2-7x inc risk
- Heavy lifting
- 1.9-7.31x INC risk for Knee
- 2.46x INC risk for Hip
- Dose resp to freq of lifting OR total wt lifted
- Heavy lifting + Kneeling or Squatting
- 2.4 lifting alone, 3.4 w/ kneeling or squatting
Risk Factors for Hip OA
Modifiable
vs.
Structural or Congenital
see pics

Recreational risk factors for Hip OA
sports: Am football, track and field, racket sports
may INC RISK
Rec. risk factors for Hip OA
Freq stair climbing
May INC RISK
Rec. risk factors for Hip OA
Recreational running
DOES NOT INC RISK
REC. risk factors for Hip OA
Walking in lieu of running
DOES NOT DECREASE RISK
REC. risk factors for Hip OA
Leisure cycling or walking
DOES NOT INCREASE RISK
GREATEST modifiable risk factor for OA ====
BMI
BMI
Greatest modifiable risk factor for OA
sytemic inflammatory response also affecting joints
- INCs risk for hand, hip, knee OA
-
Knee OA has greatest assoc w/ obesity
- Overwt== 2x risk of healthy wt indiv.
- Grade 1 obesity== 3.1x risk
- Grade 2 obesity== 4.7x risk
-
Knee OA has greatest assoc w/ obesity
BMI and OA
greatest modifiable risk factor
Losing wt has protective bennies of OA
- Losing 5% of bw reduced risk of knee OA progress. by 50% in women
BMI
greatest modifiable risk factor for OA
Wt. loss in pts w/ OA improves biomechanics ***
- Improvements in gait were NOT related to improvements in pain
Predictors of OA–Alignment
Varus alignment
4x INC in odds of medial compartment OA progress.
Predictors of OA–Alignment
Valgus alignment
5x INC in odds of Lateral compartment OA progress.
Predictors of OA–Alignment
Higher BMI==STRONG risk factor for indiv’s w/ Varus OR Valgus alignment***
- BMI was NOT risk factor in neutral align.
- BMI WAS a risk in pts w/ moderate varus or valgus
Predictors of OA – Thrust
Varus or Valgus Thrust
explain..
- quick mvmt in frontal plane during wt. bearing portion of gait cycle
- pt may have normal static alignment, but lack of motor control or laxity in jt leads to quick varus or valgus thrust during SLS

Predictors of OA–Thrust
- Varus or Valgus Thrust
- 4x inc in risk overall
- 3x INC in risk for pts w/ VARUS Alignment *****
Why is alignment and thrust an issue?
Changes magnitude and location of force
Adduction Moment @ the hip
- conceptualized as distance b/w GRF vector and joint axis
- Greater dist==greater moment
- Greater moment==greater loading
- correlated to Medial Compart. jt loading
- **predictive of Future OA progression**

M=FxD
Adduction Moment
How can we reduce the distance?
-
Moving axis CLOSER to GRF
- Unloader bracing
- Medial thrust modified gait
-
Moving GRF vector CLOSER to axis of the knee
- Lateral trunk lean modified gait
-
Combo of the two
- heel wedges
- Gait retraining
Biomechanics and knee OA
more than just static alignment
Small changes in frontal plane can influence OA incidence and progress.
Biomechanics and knee OA
Biomech-based interventions should do what?
- REDUCE abnorm frontal plane motion
- stop the thrust
- Put knee in NEUTRAL pos.
- maintain alignment
- Normalize shock-absorb feature of quads
- no stiff-legged gait patterns
- REDUCE overloading med or lat comparts
- reduce ADD moment
Biomechanics and Knee OA
addressing phys. impairments (ROM, weakness, proprio) shoud NOT exacerbate abnormal biomechanics
Don’t make it worse!!!
- Ex.
- do NOT solely train ABD’s in pt who is varus or has Varus Thrust
Biomech. Screening for pts w/ OA
Includes what?
MSK Exam (strength, ROM, alignment, effusion, function)
Tools to assess movement dysfunction
MSK Assessment
- ROM
- active/passive
- Laxity
- Strength
- Special tests for LE alignment
Static and Dynamic Visual Movement Assess.
2 Components
- Static Postural/Alignment
- Movement Assessment
Static and Dynamic Visual Movement Assess.
Static Postural/Alignment
- Weight bearing
Static and Dynamic Visual Movement Assess
Movement Assess
- Recorded if poss. to slow down and stop video
- Try and pick specific instances of gait cycle AND specific joint, then REPEAT
- Gross abnorms
- Gross quality of mvmt
- Gross asymmetries
Static and Dynamic Visual Movement Assessment
see pics
Static postural/alignment
vs.
Movement assess.

Some ex’s of Interventions for Pts w/ OA
Agility + Perturbation
Gait Retraining
Passive Devices
Monitoring response to tx
Interventions for OA
Address______
Address______
Address______
Normalize_____
- Address phys impairments
- Address behavioral changes
- Address dynamic and static malalignment issues
- Knee OA
- Normalize biomechanics and reduce biomech. risks
Interventions for OA
Addressing phys impairs
weakness, ROM (jt contractures), instability
Interventions
Addressing behavioral changes
Encourage physical activity
**6000 steps/day shoud be target to reduce functional decline
Weight loss
***IDEA study–> lose wt==less arthritis progress.
Interventions
Address dynamic and static malalignment issues in Knee OA
Bracing
NMSK training
Interventions
Normalize biomechanics and reduce biomech. risks
Gait retrain.
Agility and ge. mvmt training
STRONG evidence for all these interventions and Knee OA
- exercise
- wt loss
- self-efficacy
- self-mgmt programs
- tai chi
- cane use
- tib/fib bracing for tib/fib knee OA
- NSAIDs for Knee OA—topical
- oral NSAIDs
- intraarticular glucocorticoid injections for knee OA
Knee OA interventions
Conditional Use of these….
- Balance ex
- yoga
- CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy)
- Patellofem. bracing for patellofem knee OA
- acupuncture
- thermal modals
- radiofreq. ablation for knee OA
Table: Recommendations for phsyical, psychosocial, and mind-body approaches for the mgmt of osteoarthritis
see pics

Knee strength and ADL training VERSUS Knee strength and ADL training + Knee Stabilization
-
RCT of 159 pts w/ knee OA
- pts had knee instability verified w/ self-reported buckling OR giving way OR biomech. assessed instability of frontal plane laxity OR poor proprio
- Training focused on perception of knee position and motion to improve proprioceptive accuracy, and on maint. of static or dynamic control of the knee to limit consequences of high laxity
- EX. lunging w/ resistance and keeping neutral knee (no valgus/varus)
- 12wks, 2x/wk, 60mins, Progressive training
-
RESULTS:
- IMPROVEMENT REGARDLESS OF GROUP ASSIGN. BUT…..
- Pts w/ WEAKER Muscles responded better to the Control Intervention (Strength Training only)
- Pts w/ STRONGER Muscles responded better to the Knee Stabilization Intervention (bc had strength/muscle to perform better)
- NOTE: Adding knee stab. into treatment program may only be beneficial to indiv’s who DO NOT have substantial LE mm weakness
Passive Devices to control biomechanics in OA
examples?
- variable stiffness shoe
- contralateral cane
- bilateral hiking post
- unloader bracing
- bracing w/ extension assistance
Passive devices
Variable stiffness shoe
- Reduces ADD. moment during tasks
- protects medial compartment in knee
Contralateral Cane especially good for….
Hip OA
*good evidence to support*
Bilateral hiking poles and OA???
Limtd evidence
Unloader brace and OA
Evidence to support use
Moves knee back to neutral pos.
PTs should NOT rely on passive devices alone
- Pts need to be aware and work on improving sagittal plane motion
- *part. @ IC, LR, MSt
- Often the passive device is NOT enough and MAY req. add. relearning strategies
- Passive + Motor Retraining + Therapeutric Exercise!!!
NOTE: despite knee brace w/ EXT assist—> pt will still use flexed and stiff gait pattern
passive+motor training should match the pts what?
Deficits!!!
- Ex. if active terminal knee deficits are present
- pt has normal ROM, but lands w/ flexed knee
Passive + motor retraining should match pts what?
diff. example…
Deficits!!!
- If pt has varus thrust during WB–> use targeted training to reinforce normal mvmts during WB activities
- Training and position should match WHEN deficits occur during gait
Always start _______ and ________
start simple and progress
How do you monitor tolerance of progression?
2 ways:
- monitor signs of jt irritation or injury
* Swelling- Effusion test==indicates intra-art. prob
- tenderness to palpation
- monitor signs of jt irritation or injury
- monitor Pt reported outcomes
* Pain+soreness
* Instability
* Stiffness
- monitor Pt reported outcomes
Effusion Testing
“Sweep Test”
Stroke UP Medially
Stroke DOWN Laterally
Quantifying Effusion
Effusion Grade + Test Result
-
Zero
- NO wave produced w/ downstroke (medial)
-
Trace
- SMALL wave on medial side w/ DOWNstroke
-
1+
- LG bulge on medial side w/ downstroke
-
2+
-
Effusion spont. returns after upstroke
- NO downstroke needed****
-
Effusion spont. returns after upstroke
-
3+
- SO MUCH FLUID that it cannot be moved out of medial aspect of knee

When to Slow Progression or Hold Tx
w/ Effusion grades
- pts should NOT be progressed in ex. program when effusion is 2+ or more
- If 2+ persists despite effusion tx’s —-> contact MD
-
Tx ex’s
- compress wrap, effusion massage, limb elevation, reduced WB/activity
-
Tx ex’s
- ANY drastic change of 2 grades OR appearance of effusion when it was ABSENT
-
DEC act. to lvl prior to effusion change
- GRADUALLY reintroduce act.
-
DEC act. to lvl prior to effusion change
Soreness Rules of Exercise Progression
Joint Pain
see pics

TKA Process
see pics

THA Process and Approaches
- Medial
- Anterior
- Anterolateral
- Direct Lateral
- Posterior

THA Precautions
Posterior Approach
- Do NOT bend forward past 90deg
- Do NOT cross your legs
- Do NOT turn toes inward and Do NOT twist
- Do NOT turn knees inward or together

Concerns EARLY after SX
TKA and THA
infection
DVT and PE
Wound dehiscence (tearing apart)
Concerns EARLY after SX
THA
Hip precautions!!!
Dislocation
Nerve issues (part. sciatic or femoral)
Concerns EARLY after SX
TKA
Nerve issues (part. peroneal bc wraps around Fibular Head)
Resolution of pain and cartilage defects does NOT resolve all pt’s impairments
T/F???
TRUE!!!
- Pain resolves quickly after TKA
- often not barrier after 6wks
- OA==Chronic disease
- dx’d decades before TKA
- Mvmt patterns and NMSK control have “NEW” normal
- pts cont to rely on “good” leg
- many pts AFTER TKA walk w/ reduced knee flex==> Stiff-knee gait pattern
Resolution of pain and cartilage defects does NOT resolve all pt’s impairments
- TKA does NOT change pt behavior or phys activity
- Even AFTER rehab, strength does NOT exceed pre-op values******
-
Functional tests: important to measure pt recovery BUT do NOT provide info on biomechanics
- TUG
- 6MW
Pre-hab and Education
3 Outcomes:
-
Expectation setting
- Respect timeline, pain, hospital procedures
-
Instruction on future HEP
- Practice exercises***
-
Environment set-up/Safety
- raised toilet seat/shower chair
- assist @ home
- HIP PRECAUTIONS***
NOTE: Better you go IN===Better you come OUT (esp first week or 2)
Prehab consists of:
Exercises for ROM, strength, endurance
Stage 1:
Immediate Post-OP
Days 0-3
-
Safety, ADs, Gait
- Hip Precautions
-
Education
- HEP
- Infection
-
Determine discharge Location
- Home vs. Rehab
Stage 1:
Early Acute
Day 0–Week 2
- Attenuate swelling and prevent strength loss
- GENTLE ROM
Attenuating Swelling
Methods
Manual Lymph Drainage Massage
10 min daily @ end of the day
Pts measured swelling pre/post
Swelling
HEP
*First 2 weeks
# * Toe curling/Ankle DF **1 min ea. hour** * Choose 1 of 4 additional ex's **5x/day**
***1 min of Ankle Pumps INCs Venous Return 22% for 30mins

Physical Impairments during Early Stages post-op can include:
-
ROM
- do NOT “overdo it”
- ID pts @ risk for arthrofibrosis
-
Strength (from day 1!!!!)
-
NMES
- lg pads
- MAX tolerable intensity
- Active mm activation ON TOP OF NMES stimulated mm contraction
- provide feedback
-
NMES
- Maximize STRENGTH AND ACTIVATION!!!
Addressing Activation Deficits:
- Strengh highly correlated w/ Function
- Even 1yr post TKA pts strength SAME as pre-op values
-
Quad focus
- also hips, lower leg mm’s
Addressing Activation Deficits:
Multiple factors contribute to mm weakness:
- Activation deficits
- Disuse atrophy
- Morphological changes
- Changes in afferents/proprioception
**NOTE: contribution of hip ABD strength to phys function in pts w/ TKA
Stage 1 POST-OP
Goals/Documentation
- Realistic pt-specific goals
- Doc. pt activity @ weekly sessions
- obj. measures
- steps/day, activity counts, mins of ex, HR based on activity zones
- INC activity target on weekly basis
- % based INCs
Stage 1 & 2 Combined
Progressive Strengthening ==ESSENTIAL
HEP and Clinic
KEY WORD: ESSENTIAL !!!!!
Focus on Quality and Control of mvmts
Stage 1 and Beyond
Movement Retraining
ex. Tapered mirror/visual feedback during gait
*listening for symmetrical footstrikes
Movement retraining for gait may NOT carry over to other activities
meaning….
End phases of pt rehab should focus on pt-specific goals/whatever it is they want to get back to!!!!
Running Progression
Keep in mind you are progressing pt in TINY INCREMENTS
see pics

Recommendations for Athletic Activity after TJA???
Discouraged vs. Occasional vs. Unlimited
see pics

Word of Caution on Recommended Activities
Unlimited
- Swimming
- Walking over EVEN ground
- Golf
- Cycling over EVEN terrain
- Walking stairs
Word of Caution on Recommended Activities
NOT Recommended or NO Consensus
Based on OPINION
- Climbing
- Skiing groomed trails
- Off road cycling
- Singles tennis
- Jogging
- Skiing diff. trails
- Sprinting
CPG for Pts After TKA
Intervention Outline:
- Continuous Passive Mvmt Device (CPM) for mobilization
- NMES
- Phys Activity
- Cryotherapy
- Resist. and Int. of Strengthening Ex.
- Knee Flex during rest for swelling
- Motor Function Training
- balance, walking, mvmt, symmetry
- Post-op Knee ROM ex’s
CPM Device for Mobilization:
Recommendation:
PTs should NOT USE CPMs for pts who have undergone primary, uncomp TKA

Evidence Quality: HIGH
Recommendation Strength: MODERATE
*There is INCd risk, harm, or cost
*Positive, sig. results were contradicted by high quality studies

Cryotherapy
Recommendation:
PTs SHOULD TEACH and ENCOURAGE its use for early post-op pain mgmt

Evidence Quality: HIGH
Recommendation Strength: MODERATE
**Insuff. evidence to support a specific app. method, aplication time frame, or days post-sx to continue cryo.

Knee Flexion During Rest for Swelling
Recommendation:
PTs MAY teach pts to pos. the operated knee in SOME DEGREE of FLEX while resting during first week
***Long term effect on ROM???

Evidence Quality: HIGH
Recommendation Strength: WEAK
Potential Unmeasured Risk: Limtd Knee EXT
***This can reduce immediate post-op blood loss and swelling, as well as improve short term flexion ROM

Physical Activity CPG
Recommendation:
PTs SHOULD DEVELOP and Teach appropriate progression of physical act, based on safety, functional tolerance, and physiological response
Evidence Quailty: INSUFF.
Recommendation Strength: BEST PRACTICE
**This includes WB, balance, flex. activities which are shown to improve variety of outcomes; 42% of pts did NOT meet recommended lvls 1 yr after TKA ***
Motor Function Training
Balance, Walking, Mvmt Symmetry
Recommendation:
PTs SHOULD INCLUDE motor function training (balance, walking, mvmt symmetry w/ visual feedback)
Evidence Quality: HIGH
Recommendation Strength: MODERATE
**Improves balance, walking function, activities, participation
Post-Op Knee ROM Exercise
Recommendation:
PTs SHOULD ENCOURAGE and teach pts to implement passive, active assist, and active ROM ex’s for the involved knee following TKA
Evidence Quality: INSUFF. (Current Standard)
Recommendation Strength: BEST PRACTICE
**INCd range and function
**DECd complications
NMES
Recommendation:
PTs SHOULD USE NMES to improve quad strength, gait training, performance-based outcomes, and pt reported outcomes
Evidence Quality: HIGH
Recommendation Strength: MODERATE
**Earlier NMES and more Frequent (mult x/day) app w/ longer cumulative time @ max pt tolerance improved outcomes
**Apply for min. of 3wks
Resistance and Intensity of Strengthening Exercise
Recommendation:
PTs SHOULD design, implement, teach and progress the pt in high-intensity strength training and ex. programs w/in first week after Sx
Evidence Quality: HIGH
Recommendation Strength: MODERATE
**Improves function, strength, balance, ROM
**HIGH and LOW intensity–> equally safe