Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

EU Law > Competition Law Cases > Flashcards

Competition Law Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

SGL

A

Company refused to give information on anti-competitve behaviour so fined under Directive 1/2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Elevators Escalators Cartel

A

Fined bigtime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Synthetic Rubber Cartel

A

Fined bigtime - some got lower fines for whistle blowing, some got higher for repeat offending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hofner

A

Undertakings = any entity engaged in econ activity regardless of its legal status and way its financed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Package Tours World Cup

A

Fifa and Italian FA are undertakings under Art 101

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Motosykletistiki (MOTEO)

A

Undertakings BECAUSE it engaged in econ activity regardless of legal status and way its financed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Maschinenbau

A

Breach of Art 101(1) allowed because was trying to break into new marker under Art 101(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anic Partecipazioni

A

EC doesnt need to establish whether it is Art 101(1) or Art 101(2) breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Treuhand

A

Dont actually need to be party to cartel agmt or operate in same market to be caught - active contribution and causal link is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tepea

A

Agmt = oral or written

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hercules Chemicals

A

Undertakings just need to express joint intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bayer

A

Unilateral behaviour is generally not an agmt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Vereniging

A

Recommendations made by Trade Associations to members can be decisions falling under Art 101(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Transocean Marine Paint

A

Would compliance with recommendations have significant influence on competition within relevant market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ANSEAU

A

Decision by trade association that goods distributed exclusively under common label is decision under Art 101(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dysetuffs

A

Defines concerted practise as:
Coordination without having reached a proper agreement which effectively swaps practical cooperation for risks of competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ahlstrom Wood Pulp Cartel

A

Conduct was NOT enough to be concerted practise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

STM

A 
To fall under Art 101(1) must be forseeable that the agreement may have an influence, direct or indirect, actual or potential, on the pattern of trade
Art 101(3) rule of reason is adopted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Costen Sarl

A

Effect on trade can be increase or decrease in trade. Territorial restriction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Pronuptia de Paris

A 
Effect on trade can be a franchise agreement
Art 101(3) rule of reason is adopted
21
Q

Brasserie de Haecht

A

Collective effect of lots of small agreements can affect trade
Must examine the whole market to determine if Art 101(1) has been breached

22
Q

ICI Polypropelene

A

Horizontal agreement formed by producers at the same level of industry

23
Q

United Brands Co

A

Vertical agreements controlling each level of production
Analysis of Relative Product Market said bananas are unique
Dominance = has power to act independently of competitors and customers
Only had 50% market share but rest of market was so fragmented it was dominant
Brand identification with chiquita trademark can be dominance

24
Q

European Night Services

A

Requires full analysis of market, product, economic conditions etc to determine whether Art 101(1) has been breached

25
Q

Volk v Vervaecke

A

Established de minimis defence

26
Q

Courage v Crehan

A

Application of competition law to UK.Tied house arrangements with pub

27
Q

Manfredi [and Courage]

A

National laws in MS can be rendered redundant in order to ensure EU competition law is fully effective
Any individual can claim cimpensation for harm from causal relationship between harm and agreement/practise prohibited under Art 101

28
Q

Societa Italiana Vetro Italian Flat Glass

A

Caught under Art 102 using dominant market position.Price fixing to eliminate competition between them, controling and stabilizing market artificially

29
Q

Continental Cans

A

Relative Temporal Market was important - relatively easy for rival can manufacturers to break into market
Region of Germany was substantial part of internal market for RGM

30
Q

Hilti

A

Held dominant market position based on Relative Product Market analysis - nail guns are fairly unique
Market for consumables (replacement nails) is separate to nail gun market, Hilti was dominant in both separately
RGM was the whole internal market because significant price different in different MS despite low transport costs - the differences were purely Hilti’s fault

31
Q

Microsoft

A

Using IP rights to prevent entrance to market caught by Art 102. Bundling, locked technical aspects preventing other software being used

32
Q

Hugin

A

Separate market for spare parts for cash registers BUT Hugin is dominant in that market so refusal to supply spare parts to other cash register owners = abuse
South West England NOT substantial part of internal market for RGM

33
Q

Michelin

A

Tyres for different types of heavy vehicle are not interchangeable SO had dominant market position
One member state can be a substantial part of market for RGM

34
Q

Boosey & Hawkes

A

Marketing strategy used defined a separate market for British brass band instruments

35
Q

BPB Industries Gypsum

A

Precise definition of market is not necessary - ECJ will just look at whether the undertaking had market power or not rather than the RPM

36
Q

BT

A

UK was substantial part of internal market for RGM

37
Q

RTE McGill TV Guide

A

Ireland was substantial part of internal market for RGM

Refusing to give info on program schedule to competitors = abuse

38
Q

Alsatel

A

Region of France NOT substantial part of internal market

39
Q

Sealink Harbours

A

Holyhead port was subtantial part of internal market

Used control of port to give better better sailing times to its ferries = abuse

40
Q

Tetrapak

A

Huge relative market share = dominance

41
Q

Akzo

A

Huge relative market share = dominance

Used predatory pricing as abuse of dominance

42
Q

Hoffman la Roche

A

Superior technology can mean dominance
Sophisticated distribution systems can lead to dominance
Fidelity rebates = abuse
Undertakings need to be allowed to explain their actions as a defence to accusations of breach

43
Q

Intel

A

70% market share and rebates for buying less of competitors products was breach of Art 102

44
Q

Commercial Solvents CSC

A

Refusal to supply competitor with material necessary to make end-product = abuse

45
Q

British Leyland

A

Breach can exist even if behaviour only MIGHT affect trade

46
Q

Garden Cottage Foods

A

National courts can take role judging decisions of NCAs concering enforcement of competition law

47
Q

British American Tobacco

A

Art 101(1) used to catch anti-competitive mergers

48
Q

Airtours

A

Commission blocked merger
Conditions for collective dominance:
Market must be suffieciently transparent so each memeber of oligopoly can monitor how other members are behaving
Must be adequate punishment mechanisms to ensure members compliance over time
Forseeable reaction of consumers and current/future competitors could not hazard the policy

49
Q

Independent Music Publishers

A

Commission made objective grounds in favour of merger

EU Law (15 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions