Competence II: Ch 12-16 & 22 Flashcards

1
Q

How important it the independent variable in research studies?

A

VERY without you do not have a study without something to manipulate (in experiment manipulate the intervention also comparing treatment versus control manipulating group 1 versus group 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does “operationalizing the independent variable” mean?

A

Operationalizing clearly explicating content of variable determining if it represents variable of interest, limiting differences between treatment and control conditions, and establishing salience of the differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Provide examples of independent variables as categorical versus those that are quantitative

A

Categorical independent variable: (groups being compared together), survey, correlation / Quantitative Independent Variables: quasi experimental, experimental and regression (difference here with IV is a measure it’s a scale and continuous numbers on it both IV and DV are continuous and have numbers; numbers being compared to numbers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are status variables, and how do they fit into research designs appropriately?

A

Status variables are not amenable to manipulation because ethical constraints or logical impossibilities; cab assess associations or interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How important are dependent variables in research designs?

A

Provide a way of measuring the effect of having manipulated an independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some examples of procedural considerations that should be of concern to those who design research studies? Why is it important to be concerned about them?

A

Procedural considerations need to be addressed in order to assure that the study is being conducted appropriately (e.g. time involved with the assessments, readability of the materials, order of administration of the instruments and sufficient detail provided in method section of reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the difference between obtrusive and unobtrusive measures, and why is this an important issue in designing research studies?

A

a. Unobtrusive measures allow data collection without participant awareness and eliminate reactivity; sometimes unethical and difficult to obtain (e.g., natural or contrived settings and archives)
b. Obtrusive measures cover virtually everything else; the challenge is to be as unobtrusively obtrusive as possible in order to minimize reactivity from participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do researchers “take great care in identifying the characteristics of study participants” in the absence of random sampling?

A

ask the participants using a demographic questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How important is it to get the right number of participants in a research study?

A

Concerned about being able to publish if don’t get a large enough sample (minimum 50% return rate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the central concepts to all multicultural research?

A

race, ethnicity, culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the relationship between error variance in research studies and experimenter and participant bias?

A
  • Experimenter and participant bias is related to biological and interpersonal characteristics
  • Variety of different sources of bias that can get into the way will hinder finding out what you are trying to find out and confuse you.. need to anticipate and prevent these sources of bias
  • Error Variance is variance in results that can be charged to errors that are caused by things that we are trying to control
  • Experimenter & participants are people and have biological and interpersonal characteristics that need to be identified and controlled
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What steps can be undertaken to reduce the effects of possible experimenter bias?

A

Experimenter bias can be reduced by avoiding having a single experimenter, analyzing data differences across experiments, specifying characteristics of therapists/trainers used in treatment interventions, and examining the generalizability of data in terms of experimenter/trainer attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What steps can be undertaken to lessen effects of investigator and experimenter expectancies?

A

• Experimenter/investigator expectancies can be lessened by keeping them blind or partially blind to the hypotheses and using strategies to reduce half-hearted efforts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What strategies can be used to reduce bias due to experimental procedures?

A

a. Strategies for reducing bias due to experimental procedures include making the procedures explicit through careful descriptions, standardizing the procedures, reiterating the procedures with all personnel, training the experimenters, maintaining close contact with all personnel during the study, and checking experimenter performance and for fatigue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What strategies can be used to reduce participant bias?

A

Strategies for reducing participant bias include keeping the blind or naive to the hypotheses, reducing threat associated with the study, increasing participant honesty, reducing fears about confidentiality, appealing for increased motivation, conducting post-experimental inquiries, using disguise or acceptable deception, performing spot-checks on participant performance, evaluating the reading level of all instruments, and being attentive to participant ability to report their cognitive and affective processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

statistically significant results:

A

indicates that the results for reach of the conditions are sufficiently different and consequently the null hypothesis of no differences is rejected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

manipulation checks:

A

goal is to show: 1. Conditions vary on the intended dimensions, 2. That conditions do not vary on other dimensions 3. Treatments are implemented in the intended fashion; no assurance that experimental manipulation will achieve its purpose so manipulation checks look into the following three conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

non-significant results:

A

can be due to multiple factors beyond lack of true effect including: inadequate statistical power, insensitive instruments, violated assumptions of statistical tests, careless procedures, and bias. Or poorly designed IVs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

target population

A

well defined set of people that the study hopes to generalize to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

sampling theory:

A

involves selecting samples that reflect larger or total populations. Technically the population is the observations or scores of people rather than the people themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

participant pool:

A

group of people who both fit the definition of target population and are accessible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

good enough principle:

A

non-random samples can have characteristics such that generalization to a certain population is reasonable. - documenting important characteristics of the sample (e.g., age, gender, race, etc.); rule of thumb = more is better; NIH studies = information about women and members of minority groups must be included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

statistical power analysis:

A

power is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when the alternative is true, or likelihood of detecting an effect when the effect is truly present. Dependent upon (1) particular statistical test used (2) the alpha level (3) the directionality of statistical test (4) the size of the effect (5) the number of participants. POWER MUST BE CALCULATED FOR EACH SPECIFIC STATISTICAL TEST

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

specifying the effect size prior to a study

A

this is problematic because if you knew the effect size before the study was conducted there would be no need to conduct the study. Effect size must be stipulated before the number of participants can be determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Race

A

presumed classification of all human groups on the basis of visible physical traits or phenotype and behavioral differences (ex. Skin color, physical features, language). Include biological component

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ethnicity:

A

ones national origin, religious affiliation, or other type of socially or geographically defined group, nationality, culture, language. Broad interpretation: ethnicity shares culture and physical features; narrow interpretation: ethnicity restricted to cultural differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Culture

A

differences in psychologically, anthropologically, sociologically. Objective culture (human made part of environment buildings, roads, homes, tools) Subjective culture(values, believes, attitudes, role definitions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Worldview

A

when race and culture overlap, a racial world view is created involves classifying human groups as exclusive, ranking these groups as superior or inferior, linking physical features with psychological qualities

29
Q

Identity:

A

combination of race, ethnicity, culture intersects to contribute to group identity.

30
Q

theory-driven research

A

Once phenomenon is described, you can then create a theory and have a study that is build to validate the given theory or disprove it.

31
Q

descriptive research

A

researcher that provides descriptive information about different populations where there is a small knowledge base. Describe a phenomenon (descriptive and inferential statistics). Beginning stages of research rely on descriptive studies to gain more information about the phenomenon.

32
Q

distal explanations

A

factors that do not directly explain observed phenomena. Ex: not psychological in nature but are demographic. (race, ethnicity, gender, sex, SES, age)

33
Q

proximal explanations

A

factors that more directly explain observed phenomena. Usually psychological in nature

34
Q

moderator variables

A

affect the direction and or strength of the relationship between predictor (IV) and criterion (DV), Involve questions of when and for whom, and either categorical or continuous

35
Q

mediator variables:

A

variables that account for or explain the relationship between a predictor (IV) and criterion (DV). Usually involve establishing how or why a predictor variable causes or predicts a criterion variable. Usually psychological in nature

36
Q

mixed-method designs

A

refers to the conjunctive use of both qualitative and quantitative data analysis strategies. Strengths: validity strengthened using more than one method, reduce mono-method and mono-operation bias

37
Q

experimenter bias

A

related to biological and personal characteristics, opinions, beliefs, values, unconsciously or consciously compromise their objectivity

38
Q

experimenter and investigator expectancies

A

beliefs and desires about either how the participant should perform or how the study should turn out, the effect of these expectancies referred to as unintentional expectancy effects b/c experimenter may not intentionally try influence participants they actually do so unconsciously through a range of verbal and nonverbal behaviors that introduces confounding variables.

39
Q

experimentor

A

person who executes the investigation

40
Q

investigator

A

the person who designs the study

41
Q

procedural imprecision

A

occurs when activities, tasks, and instructions of an experiment are not specifically defined. Then experimenters might treat participants differently b/c they are unclear exactly how to conduct the experiment in specific situations. Three problems with procedural imprecision (1) experimenters most likely vary among themselves in addition o introducing systematic biases over time, (2) if procedures unclear investigator does not know what actually occurred (3) statistical issue of introducing error variance or noise into the data due to experimenter variability

42
Q

keeping experimenters blind or partially blind:

A

does not know purpose of the study or what you hope to find so cannot subtly or consciously bias results from participants.

43
Q

demand characteristics

A

cues within an experiment that may influence participants to respond in a particular way apart from the independent variable. Typically subtle influences or pressures, difficult to identify

44
Q

participant characteristics: self-presentation style:

A

desire present themselves in positive light, compelled respond in socially desirable ways; motivation level: participants ability to want to provide accurate information and engage; Intellectual skills: ability for participants to respond to questionnaire or study; psychological defenses: feel need to repress or deny true feelings; worldview: assumptions about world sway responses

45
Q

post-experimental inquiries

A

after the experimenter assesses potential participant bias by asking participants questions either in the form of an interview or questionnaire about their beliefs concerning how the experimenter wanted them to respond, purpose of experiment, and problems encountered. Helpful for researchers worried about demand characteristics.

46
Q

Which sections of a research report as presented in the textbook will be found in a thesis or dissertation proposal?

A

Intro, lit review, method

47
Q

Why is the title important?

A

indexing reasons

48
Q

What does “The abstract should be self-contained” mean?

A

allows reader to make sense of the study without reading any other components of the report

49
Q

What are the important components of an introduction to a research report?

A

importance of the topic, what previous empirical and theoretical work bears on the topic, how previous work led to author’s research question and hypotheses, how the question will be researched, and what predictions can be made

50
Q

Where does a review of the related literature fit into the introduction of a research report or proposal?

A

Literature review information is included in the introduction—enough to develop a logical argument for the research question

51
Q

Abstract

A

summary of research of the report used for indexing and retrieving articles. Summarize content of each of the major sections of the report Hypothesis, method, results, conclusions in 100-120 words, self contained

52
Q

Introduction

A

sets the stage for the study, orient reader to problem, develop rationale behind the study and indicate specifically the hypothesis being tested. Three elements 1. Intro to problem 2. Development of framework for study 3. Statement of research question/ hypothesis

53
Q

rationale for a study

A

built through logical interconnectedness of empirical results and theory that leads to a critical unanswered research question. Provides a framework of elements connected in logical way. Literature cited should be pertinent to this particular research study

54
Q

research questions

A

used in descriptive studies especially of qualitative nature b/c author knows little about the topic and purpose of study is more exploratory

55
Q

research hypotheses

A

use as critical test of some important theoretical or practical question. Critical to the extent that it tests an implication from a theory and that the implication is unique to that theory. Should be stated unambiguously

56
Q

method

A

describes how the research question/ hypothesis were examined including all aspects of how study conducted. Need enough detail to determine validity of the study and replicate the study. Subsections: participants, measures, materials, design and procedures

57
Q

Procedure

A

describes how the research was conducted with participants. Discuss everything that researchers did with participants from beginning to end including instructions, formation of groups, experimental manipulations, interview questions, development, etc . Discussed chronologically

58
Q

results

A

summarize data and the results of the analyses utilized in the study

59
Q

discussion

A
  1. Explanation of the results of the data analyses, whether or not data supported the hypothesis, 3. Statement of conclusions 4. Indication of study limitations 5. Discuss limitations. Allows researcher to expand upon the findings and place them in context of previous research and theory on this topic.
60
Q

limitations of a study

A

related to methodological issues such as low power, analogue nature of study, violated assumptions of statistical test, confounds, etc.

61
Q

implications of a study

A

indicate how results can affect practice and theory

62
Q

overstating/exaggerating

A

no single stand alone study will alter the field of counseling, but it is the accumulation of knowledge from other studies that drives your study to find something new. Refrain from stating practitioners should change their practice, not advisable to be critical of others

63
Q

Bryant and Baker

A

Exploratory factor analysis, important for theoretical reasons, goal racial identity development of Native Americans,

64
Q

Parikh et al

A

Regression analysis examine how political ideology, religious identity, and SES, race related to SJA attitudes among school counselors, stepwise regression

65
Q

Swisher et al

A

Ex post facto survey design retrospective comparative analysis (comparison of unmanipulated variables) also had scale construction for SAP programs conducted content analysis and pilot testing

66
Q

Granello

A

Cognitive complexity of counselors stepwise Regression

67
Q

Dunn & Baker

A

school counselors with disabilities survey

68
Q

Ting

A

Regression estimating academic success first year students