Comparative approach Flashcards

1
Q

comparative politics asks what kind of questions and seek answer of what?

A

causal questions and seeking answers of comparative significance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

comparative politics engages in controversies about what?

A

about scientific standards (the how do you know question!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what types of questions are preliminary to a search for causal explanations

A

descriptive questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what type of questions are not posed in comparative politics

A

normative/evaluative questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

However, _____ may have implications for normative questions

A

research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Falsifiability definition

A

the research question must be able to be proven wrong as otherwise it is not testable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Internal validity defintion

A

applies to the causes you have studied within your causal path

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

generalisability/external validity definition

A

findings apply outside of your causal mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

dependant variable

A

what one is trying to explain (successful or failed repression of mass uprising)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

independent variable

A

the causes (revolutionary versus non-revolutionary regime origin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

intervening variable

A

intermediate steps in a causal chain (basis for security service affiliation to regime). All the other steps in between

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is small n analysis and what does it look for?

A

looking at small amount of cases, looking for internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

conditions for method of agreement

A

same precondition, same outcome therefore the precondition is the cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

conditions for method of difference

A

when the precondition is absent, outcome is absent there the precondition is the cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is process tracing

A

– puts forward a chain of variables. Involves following the steps in the causal mechanism (“causal process observations”), demonstrating that each is taking place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how does process tracing link the dependant and independent variable

A

through a process of intervening variables

17
Q

what is a theory?

A

a set of logically consistent statements that tell us why things we observe occur

18
Q

what is a counterfactual and give an example of it

A

• Counterfactual is what would have happened if it lacked the variable and the outcome. X missed flight because they overslept. Counterfactual is if x didn’t oversleep and got onto their flight.

19
Q

____ _____ theories aim to explain everything? give some examples

A

grand narrative

marxism, post-structuralism, rational choice, modernisation theory

20
Q

what type of theories explain only transferable concepts with their specific area of focus? give some examples

A

middle range

labour process, bourgeoisie democratisation, de-industrialisation

21
Q

what does endogeneity mean?

A

chicken and egg scenario. doe social structures shape institutions or vice versa

22
Q

what is the difference between structural and agency explanations

A

structural - context of social institutions. social structures determine human actions. example - marxism

agency - individual or group actors. social structure is the product of the acts of persons.

bottom up versus top down

23
Q

what is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning

A

deductive -
from more general to more specific.
starts with thinking up a theory and then narrows that down into more specific testable hypotheses. result is confirmation of original theories

inductive reasoning -
begin to detect patterns and regularities
formulate an hypothesis that you can explore
end up developing a general theory of conclusion