Collecting the evidence Flashcards
Constructing a question - PICO
Patient
Intervention Comparison Outcome
‘Anatomy’ of a good question
- Define precisely whom the question is about (how would I describe a similar group of patients)
- Define which option you are considering (eg drug treatment) and possible comparison (eg placebo or standard therapy)
- Define the desired (or undesired) outcome (eg reduced mortality, better quality of life)
• Systematic Reviews/ Meta-analyses
– Secondary sources of information vetted by independent
researchers and clinicians (Cochrane Collaboration)
• ClinicalPracticeGuidelines
– Reviews covering large disease groups and treatment
strategies (NICE guidelines, SIGN Guidelines)
• Original article containing primary research data
– eg randomised-controlled trial (RCT)
When trying to answer a clinical question
1. Start with – Cochrane Reviews – NICE and SIGN Guidelines 2. Then use – MedLine (Ovid, PubMed)
Interpreting the evidence
- How are clinical studies designed
- Different types of data
- Hypothesis testing
- P value and statistical significance
- Type I and Type II errors
- Confidence intervals
- Number needed to treat(NNT)
- Odds ratio
- Forest plots
Hypothesis construction
– Null hypothesis– two sets of data are from the same population and not different
– Alternative hypothesis– two sets of data are from different populations and are different
quantitive discrete
can only have certain numerical
values (number of children)
quantitive continuous
do not have discrete steps (height and weight)
Nominal (unordered categories)
• Male/female, green/blue/ eyes, alive or dead
Ordinal (ordered categories)
• Objective – heavy, moderate or light drinkers (based on the number of units of alcohol drunk per week), grade of breast cancer
questionnaires
• Subjective
Hypothesis testing
– Assume the null hypothesis – two sets of data are from the same population and not different
– Determine the probability that the null hypothesis is correct – P value
p value
if this is one it means the null hypothesis is true
P < 0.05
- An arbitrary cut-off of 0.05 or 5% (1 chance in 20) has been chosen to indicate that the null hypothesis can be reasonably rejected
- If P < 0.05 then there is a statistically significant difference
Type I error
rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true (false positive) - concluding there is an effect when there isn’t (P is small)
Type II error
not rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false (false negative) - concluding there is no effect when there is (P is large)
Power
• The power of a test is its ability to reject the null hypothesis when it is false
– the capacity to detect an effect if one is present
power questions
– Was the sample size large enough? – Variation small enough?