Collecting information on performance Flashcards
Describe one method you could use to collect data on mental factors. (4). (PPW) (can be used for all factors)
A method I used to gather data on mental factors was the Performance Profiling Wheel (PPW)
The PPW a wheel arranged into 8 different sections with a mental sub-factor written on the outside of each section. Within each section, are 10 segments which represent a score of 1-10 with 1 being the poorest and 10 being the best. Each mental sub-factor has 2 sections, one is filled out before my PDP and I then complete the other section after my PDP.
I completed this before planning my PDP on my own in a quiet place, away from anyone that may change my decisions.
To begin with I would consider my capabilities in each section. I would then give myself a score out of 10 and shade the correct number of segments in red. I then identified my strengths and weaknesses by seeing what section had the least shading.
After my PDP I would shade the 2nd section for each sub-factor in green and check for improvements.
Explain why you could use this method to collect data on the mental factor. (4). (PPW) (can be used for all factors)
I used the PPW because
it was practical as I was able to do it at home away from the training ground… I took my time in completing the method as I was not rushed to go out and train… provided well thought out and valid responses.
it was practical as it was very easy to interpret my data… was easy for me to accurately identify my strengths and weaknesses as I just looked for the colour red remaining in each section… selecting the correct weak sub-factors and collecting more detailed data on why they were a weakness.
it was practical as it was quick and easy to complete… I did not get bored in a long winded process and was able to really focus and give honest answers as I remained motivated.
it was measurable as it was a permanent record… able to compare my subsequent re-tests back to my initial data to measure my improvements… receiving a boost in confidence when I noticed my progress and enabled me to set even more challenging goals to ensure I did not plateau.
Describe one method you could use to collect data on mental factors. (4). (SCAT)
One method I used to collect data on the mental factor (anxiety) was the Sports Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT).
The SCAT had 15 statements in the form of a questionnaire.
To the right of each statement were three potential responses: ‘rarely’, ‘sometimes’ and ‘often’.
At the bottom of the sheet was a box for my SCAT score and a set of NORMS. Over the page there was a table which attributed a score to each answer I selected.
I completed the SCAT immediately after a performance, by myself away from anyone who could impact my decision.
I read each statement and placed a tick in the appropriate box. I then identified my score for each statement in the table over the page. I finished by adding up these scores and comparing my overall score to the NORMS and identifying my anxiety levels.
Explain why you could use this method to collect data on the mental factor. (4). (SCAT)
I chose the SCAT because
it was practical as it was very easy to interpret my scores… easy for me to identify my anxiety levels by comparing it to the NORMS and identifying if it was a strength or a weakness…using these NORMS to help me set a realistic and achievable target for my development plan.
it was appropriate as it is a scientifically recognised measurement of a performer’s anxiety levels…I received valid results as I followed the protocols correctly.’
it was measurable as it was a permanent record… I had baseline information to compare my re-tests to back to which made it easy for me to chart my progress… making changes to the approaches I was using when I saw that my progress was plateauing.
Describe one method you could use to collect data on physical factors. (4).
(Illinois Agility test)
This test had 4 cones set up in a rectangular shape with the cones being 10 metres (m) apart vertically and 5m apart horizontally.
Down the middle (2.5m in) of this rectangle, were 4 further cones that were all 3.3 m apart.
I started at the bottom left cone whilst lying down on my stomach with my head behind the line and my arms by my sides.
On the timekeeper’s signal, I ran directly up towards and around the top left cone before running down to the bottom middle cone.
I then weaved in and out of the middle cones both up to the top and then back to the bottom.
I finished by sprinting up and around the top right cone before running directly passed the bottom right cone.
As I crossed the line at the bottom right cone, the timekeeper hit stop and recorded my time.
I then compared this to the NORMS.
Describe one method you could use to collect data on physical factors. (4). (Beep Test)
One method a performer could use to collect data on the physical factor (CRE) is the Bleep Test.
The Bleep Test contains 2 lines being set up 20 metres (m) apart on a flat and dry surface.
In the corner of the room, the teacher starts playing the audio for the bleep test.
Participants stand with their foot behind the line waiting on the audio to start.
On the first beep, participants make their way to the opposite line before the next beep.
At this point, they then turn around and jog back to the first line before the following beep.
This continues with the beeps getting closer together and participants having to jog faster to reach each line.
If a participant misses one beep, they must reach their next line before the next beep.
Missing two consecutive beeps means they are out.
At this point, they note their score and compare their performance to the NORMS.
Describe one method you could use to collect data on physical factors. (4). (20m Sprint Test)
A method I used to collect data on physical factors (speed) was the 20 metre (m) Sprint Test.
The 20m Sprint Test has two cones laid out 20m apart on a flat and dry surface.
I initially waited behind one of the cones in a staggered stance position.
At the other cone was a timekeeper holding a stopwatch.
On the timekeepers command, I sprinted as fast as I could to the other cone.
The timekeeper stopped the watch as I ran through the opposite cone.
I then received my score and compared it to the NORMS.
Explain why you could use this method to collect data on the physical factor. (4).
I used the Illinois Agility Test to collect data on the physical factor because
it was practical as it was easy to interpret my result…all I did was compare my time to the NORMS.. lead to me easily setting achievable and realistic targets for my development plan… received a motivation boost as I knew that I was close to improving my agility if I gave my all in reaching an achievable target.
it is an appropriate measurement of one’s agility as it is a standardised fitness test…I could trust the test to actually measure my agility levels as I followed the protocols correctly.
it provided me with reliable data as it gave me a quantitative score… no bias on my part and I could trust the score given to accurately identify how good my agility levels were… setting my approaches at the correct intensities during my development plan.
it provided me with a measurable baseline data as it was a permanent record… I was able to compare my progress in subsequent re-tests to see how much I had improved… when I found I had not improved, I was able to increase frequency of my sessions to help me overcome my plateau.
Explain why it is important to collect data before beginning a performance development plan. (4)
It is important to collect data before beginning a performance development plan
because it allows performers to identify their strengths and weaknesses within the factors… therefore creating an appropriate development plan that uses approaches that are specific to both the performers weakness and their sport… knowing the level of a weakness… setting their approaches at the correct intensities… ensure they are working at a level that is relevant to their current capabilities and short-term goals…
it can provide performers with a baseline measurement… performers will have a reference point to look back upon to see if they have improved when they re-test their weaknesses at the midway and endpoints of their development plan…When making these comparisons, performers may then receive a boost to their confidence and motivation levels if they notice improvements which can lead to them continuing to give 100% in subsequent sessions.
On the contrary, if performers note that they have not improved when making these comparisons, it can lead to them reviewing their development plan and altering their goals, approaches and/or intensities to make it more applicable to their weaknesses.
it can provide performers with data to guide their target setting… using the data to set achievable and realistic goals… boost their motivation to give everything during each session as they know that the improvements are within their reach.
What are the different types of data?
1) QUANTITATIVE DATA = OBJECTIVE INFORMATION
Quantitative data provides objective information about a performance with no personal opinion attached. This type of data is usually a quantity such as a time or a measurement.
2) QUALITATIVE DATA = SUBJECTIVE INFORMATION
Qualitative data is open to subjectivity as opinions play a role due to you, a partner or a coach providing/recording information.
What is PARV(M)? (effectiveness)
1) Is my method of data collection PRACTICAL? Is it easy to carry out? Does it cost any money? Are the results easy to interpret?
2) Is my method APPROPRIATE? Does my method actually measure the sub-factor I am interested in? Is it performance related?
3) Does my method produce RELIABLE results? Can I trust the data? Are the protocols for this method clearly defined and administered similarly elsewhere?
4) How VALID are the processes involved in completing this method? Can I defend the process I went through?
5) Does my method have the potential to be MEASURABLE? Is the method a permanent record that can be looked back upon to gauge improvements?
Describe the team cohesion questionnaire?
Played a game of basketball & then filled out questionnaire on your own away from teammates
18 statements
Scale of 1-9
1 being strongly disagree, 9 being strongly agree
Score by circling the number of how you feel about that statement
Added up scores for team cohesion & social cohesion
Checked what your score meant - poor, below average, average, very good or excellent
