cognitive theory Flashcards

1
Q

Cognitive theory is interested in…

A

Individual perspective, not an objective reality
- How we anticipate/predict things to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a personal construct?

A
  • A concept used to interpret, or construe the world (schema)
    → People automatically use constructs to categorize events
    → A person anticipates events by observing patterns and regularities
    → People notice that some events share characteristics that distinguish them from other events
    → It is this construing of a similarity and a contrast that leads to the formation of a construct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

There are 3 elements necessary to form a construct, what are they?

A
  • 2 Similar constructs and 1 contrasting
  • Two of the elements must be perceived as similar to each other; the third element must be perceived as different from those two (contrasting)
    → The way in which two elements are construed to be similar forms the similarity pole
    → The way in which they are contrasted with the third element forms the contrast pole
    → Example: observing two people helping someone and a third hurting someone could lead to the construct kind/cruel, with kindness forming the similarity pole and cruel the contrast pole
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

True or false: When it comes to personal constructs, we needs both poles (similar and contrasting) for either of them to actually mean anything.

A

True: Being kind doesn’t hold it’s meaning without having the cruel pole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

True or false: Differences in construct systems often contribute to failures in communication

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the results of research by Simpson, Large, & O’Brien (2004) on personal constructs and interpersonal communication?

A
  • They aimed to see if difficulties in communication could result when groups fail to recognize that they have many common constructs
  • 2 groups:
    1) clinical health professionals responsible for patient care
    2) hospital managers responsible for business operations
    → Groups asked to enumerate the characteristics ideal for a clinician and for a manager
    → i.e., what they had in common
    → Groups then observed each other’s personal construct lists
    → Previously opposed groups learned they held many constructs in common, which facilitated subsequent discussions
    → focusing on what you have in common can help with communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 2 types of constructs?

A

1) Verbal construct: can be expressed in words, it is explicit
2) Preverbal construct: one that is used even though the person has no words to express it
→ (a distinction Freudians would call conscious versus unconscious)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a submerged construct? Give an example of this.

A
  • When one end of a bipolar construct is not available for verbalization, it is characterized as being submerged (unconscious)
    → because we can’t have one pole without the other, but we can’t express the other, we submerge it
    → p.ex: if a person does not want to acknowledge that there are bad people, they submerge the concept of bad people, while acknowledging the construct of good people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Each construct has a ___ of convenience and a ___ of convenience.

A

Range; focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a construct’s range of convenience?

A
  • All those events for which application of the construct is useful
    → we’re only going to use the construct within its range of convenience
    → some constructs may have wider range of convenience
    → p.ex: you can categorize things as either good or bad to a wide range of things, it’s very broad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a construct’s focus of convenience?

A
  • The particular events for which application of the construct would be maximally useful, where is it most useful
    → p.ex: when having a surgery, you will focus more on whether your nurse is caring or not, but they may not be as important in other contexts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Caring/uncaring might apply to people in all situations where help is given (___), but would be particularly applicable in situations where special sensitivity and effort are required (___)

A

Range; focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a core construct? Give an example of this.

A
  • Basic to a person’s functioning; can be changed only with great consequences for the rest of the construct system
    → Example: If you have strong beliefs about religion and weaker beliefs about art
    → Your conception of “sinful–holy” acts may be a core personal construct that is virtually unchangeable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a peripheral construct? Give an example of this.

A
  • Much less basic than a core construct; can be altered without serious modification of the core structure
    → Example: If you have strong beliefs about religion and weaker beliefs about art
    → Your conception of “creative–uncreative” art may be a peripheral construct that easily can be changed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the REP test? How is it used?

A
  • The role construct repertory test: Kelly’s test to determine the constructs used by a person, the relationships among constructs, and how the constructs are applied to specific people
  • 2 steps
    1) Role title test
    → In the first step, people asked to indicate the names of specific people who fill various roles in their life (e.g., mother, father, a teacher you liked)
    2) Elicitation of constructs
    → Examiner then picks three specific figures from the list and asks the test-taker to indicate how two of these people are alike and are different from the third
    → the researcher is forcing the participant to pull out constructs about these people
    → Example: Mother, Father, and Liked Teacher
    → Person might say that Father and Liked Teacher are similar and are different from Mother
    → Might then say that Father and Liked Teacher are similar in that they are “outgoing,” and different from Mother who is “shy”
    → One learns that the person has, in their head, the construct “shy–outgoing”
    → With each presentation of a new triad, the test-taker generates a construct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the REP test assess? Give an example.

A
  • It allows the researcher to assess what constructs this person has
    –> p.ex: when a person names 2 similar figures such as friend and manager and says they are both calm, then one contrasting figure of their older sister as anxious; this means they have a “calm-anxious” construct
17
Q

How is cognitive complexity assessed?

A
  • Researchers gauge complexity of the construct systems that people display
    → If always used the same construct when evaluating others, low complexity score
    → If used a large number of different constructs, high complexity score
18
Q

What are the differences between a person with low complexity and high complexity?

A
  • Cognitively complex students are…
    → More accurate in predicting the behaviour of others
    → More able to recognize differences between themselves and others
    → Less likely to mistakenly conclude that other people would respond to social situations in the same manner that they themselves would
    → High-complex people try to use the inconsistent information in forming an impression
    → More complex individuals are better able to understand and take on the role of others
    → Complexity is related most strongly to Big 5 trait of Openness to experience
  • Low complex people
    → Commonly form an impression that is consistent by rejecting all information inconsistent with that impression (freezing)
19
Q

In anticipating events, when do fear, anxiety and threat come in to play according to personal construct theory?

A
  • Anxiety: recognition that the events with which one is confronted lie outside the range of convenience of one’s construct system
    → One is anxious when one is without constructs; when confronted with events they cannot construe
  • Fear: when a new construct appears to be about to enter the construct system
  • Threat: awareness of imminent comprehensive change in one’s core structure
20
Q

What is fixed-role therapy?

A
  • The therapist wants clients to behave in new ways, to construe themselves in new ways, and thereby to become new people
    → Psychologist writes a sketch of an alternative type of person that the client can “try out” as a way of expanding their construct system
    → For about two weeks, the client is asked to assume the new personality
    → Goal: individual’s reconstruction of the self
    → Drop some constructs, create new ones, do some tightening and loosening, develop a construct system that leads to more accurate predictions
21
Q

What is the importance of anticipating future events? (according to Kelly)

A
  • This is Kelly’s fundamental postulate of personal construct theory
    → People’s psychological processes are channeled by the ways in which they anticipate events
    → People use their personal construct system to anticipate what the future will bring
    → The fundamental postulate links the structure aspects of Kelly’s theory (the personal construct system) to ongoing dynamic processes
  • As we see the same events repeated over and over, we modify our constructs so that they will lead to more accurate predictions
  • People choose the course of behaviour that they believe offers the greatest opportunity for anticipating future events (makes us feel validated)
22
Q

What happens when an anticipated event happens or does not happen?

A
  • If the anticipated event does occur, the prediction has been upheld and the construct validated
  • If the anticipated event does not occur, the construct has been invalidated
    → The individual must develop a new construct or must loosen or expand the old construct to include the prediction of the event that took place