chap 13 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the differences between and independent and an interdependent view of the self?

A

Independant:
- Mainly seen in European-American cultures
- Person is an entity that can be characterized as a kind of “container” within which are stored a collection of psychological traits that are the cause of the person’s actions
→ in independent culture, we are mainly seeking our own individual rights, happiness and goals
Interdependent:
- People are construed in terms of their roles with family and social relationships
- The cultural system emphasizes the responsibilities that are inherent in one’s position within these relationships, rather than highlighting the individual person’s self-centered pursuit of happiness
- Behaviour is not explained in terms of autonomous mental traits that reside in the person’s head
→ People explain behaviour in terms of networks of social obligations (p.ex: seeing high conscientiousness means being a caregiver, some type of helping role)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

East Asians are less likely to make efforts to maintain a high sense of ___ ___; Instead, ___ ___ functions as a salient motive to do better.

A

Personal esteem; self-criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

True or false: In East Asia people are not more intrinsically motivated to engage in tasks when they choose them personally

A

True: Instead, experience greater intrinsic motivation when choices are made by authority figures or trusted peers (interdependent view of the self)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does the culture in Bali differ to Western culture? Specifically regarding to labels.

A
  • In Bali, the label that people use to describe themselves is not a unique, personal name
  • Personal names are treated as very private
  • Terms for referring to people make reference to
    → Family members (a person is “Mother-of-______________”)
    → Social status (which strongly defines how the person should be treated)
    → Social roles (e.g., village chief, caregiver)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 4 types of causal attributions?

A

Internal, external, stable, unstable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the causal attributions made typically in individualistic/independant cultures?

A
  • Individualistic cultures emphasize personality traits and view individuals as being responsible for their own actions
    → we assign our own failures to external factors, but others failures to internal factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the causal attributions made typically in interdependent/collectivist cultures?

A
  • Collectivistic cultures are more attentive to the situational context in which behaviour occurs and view people as part of the larger groups to which they belong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean to be capable of frame-switching?

A

Bicultural people can change the culturally grounded framework through which they interpret any given event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was frame-switching manipulated in Chinese-American individuals?

A
  • Individuals who have lived long enough in two different cultures that they have internalized the belief systems of both
  • Stimuli that cognitively prime one versus another cultural frame can influence the bicultural individual’s subsequent thinking processes
    –> In Chinese-Americans, they were primed with either a chinese dragon or an american flag; they responded to the event accordingly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the differing impacts of academic passions for independent and interdependent cultures?

A
  • In this study, they correlated levels of passion with levels of success in class in math and science
  • Countries including the US, the UK, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, and Denmark: the correlation was high (>0.4)
    → intrinsic motivation is more important in these cultures
  • Countries including Indonesia, Thailand, Columbia, and Peru: the correlation was relatively low (<0.2)
    → intrinsic motivation is less important in these cultures for autonomous motivations, this explains why passion isn’t correlated with success
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the importance of connection to culture for Indigenous peoples?

A
  • Strong connection to Indigenous culture is protective against negative outcomes often associated with high-risk indigenous adolescents, including low self-esteem, social and physical aggression
    → Those who feel a sense of belonging toward their cultural group have less engagement in delinquent behaviour (especially for indigenous people)
  • Adolescent well-being is contingent on having a self that is understood as continuous over time, with connections both to the past and to the future
    → indigenous youth may suffer in their well-being if unable to connect to their past
    → if you feel like you aren’t connected to anything you may struggle to figure out where you’re going in the future
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Identify the important contexts for studying Indigenous youth.

A
  • Research regarding the personality development of Indigenous youth is framed within a strength-based approach: emphasis is on resilience and well-being
  • Focus on resilience overshadows the breadth and depth of personality constructs and conceptualizations of personality development
  • Indigenous youth have lives and cultures that are richer and more fulfilling than can be encapsulated solely with regard to the trials faced by their ancestors and them
    → it’s important to not only focus on the trauma they have gone through, but also to look into the positive aspects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Identify issues with Indigenous representation.

A
  • Common representations of Indigenous groupings limits the ability of Indigenous people to see the uniqueness and successes of their particular communities
    → Exposure to stereotypical mascots has been associated with significantly depressed state self-esteem and with depressed feelings of community worth among Indigenous youth
    → even if it’s a mascot that represents positive qualities, it creates a certain disconnect between the person and the stereotype which is supposed to “represent” them but they don’t identify with it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the results of Lynam and colleagues’ (2000) study on impulsivity and SES?

A
  • They studied a large sample of 13-year-olds in Pittsburgh who lived in neighborhoods ranging from low to high socioeconomic status (SES)
    In poor neighborhoods: high-impulsive individuals were more likely than low- impulsive individuals to become involved in delinquent behaviours
    In affluent neighborhoods: high- and low- impulsive individuals did not differ in delinquency
    → there’s a type of protective behaviour because maybe they don’t have to engage in these delinquent behaviours or their impulsivity is expressed in a less delinquent manner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the socioemotional selectivity theory explain?

A
  • Carstensen’s socioemotional selectivity theory: People are aware of the opportunities and constraints associated with different points in the life course
    → This awareness of time influences one’s life goals
    → For the younger adult, it makes sense to focus on the future
    → If one sees oneself as being near the end of life, it is more reasonable to select and focus one’s energies on one or two goals that have an immediate positive impact on one’s life
    Hypothesis: the older adult will be more likely than the younger adult to invest energy into a small, select set of social relationships that enhance emotional experience in that moment, in the present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Cartenson’s study find regarding his socioemotional selectivity theory?

A
  • The study:
    → Participants given a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book you have just read)
    → Participants made ratings that would reveal the dimensions that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list
  • Older adults
    → Focused their thoughts on the emotional qualities of the people on the list
    → Paid lesser attention to whether a meeting with a given person might provide information that would be valuable in the future
  • Younger adults
    → Focused less on people’s emotional qualities
    → Focused more on the possibility of informative meetings with new people— whether or not those meetings involved experiences that were emotionally positive
17
Q

Identify the characteristics of relationships with someone high in rejection sensitivity.

A
  • People who indicate a high likelihood of rejection + lots of anxiety about being rejected are high in rejection sensitivity
  • They state that their partner is intentionally hurtful:
    → p.ex: “my partner is spending less time with me, they don’t want to be around me”
    → if someone was lower in rejection sensitivity, they would rather make an attribution that their partner is just busy, it wasn’t because of them
  • People with high rejection sensitivity before a relationship are more likely to infer hostile intent after relationship starts
  • Both rejection-sensitive individuals and their romantic partners have been found to experience less satisfaction with their relationships, as compared to people low in rejection sensitivity
  • Relationships of people who are high in rejection sensitivity also are more likely to break up
18
Q

What does it mean to have hot-focus or cool-focus regarding a past situation?

A

→ Hot-focus condition: thought about their emotions during the rejection experience
→ Cool-focus condition: attention directed to situational features not emotionally involving

19
Q

What were the results of research by Ayduk et al. (2001) on dealing with rejection sensitivity with hot and cool attentional focus?

A
  • When asked to describe their mood, people who focused on “cool” aspects of the experience described themselves as being less angry than people in the hot-focus condition or people in a control condition
  • When participants wrote an essay describing their thoughts and feelings while thinking about the experience, cool-focus participants composed essays featuring less angry, emotional content (priming)
  • Other measures indicated that focusing attention on one’s emotional reactions (“hot focus”) activated thoughts about hostility
  • People who thought about the same type of interpersonal encounter but who focused their attention on different aspects of the encounter had substantially different psychological experiences
  • to shift your focus in this way is actually helpful rather than suppressing emotions
    → coping strategy to deal with emotional reactions that can be maladaptive
20
Q

What is transference?

A
  • We use a given piece of stored knowledge to interpret an event when that knowledge overlaps with information in the situation we are interpreting
  • This informational overlap may activate knowledge about an individual in your past
    → p.ex: meeting a new colleague who tells jokes the same way your friend does, and it activates knowledge about this friend, it reminds you of them
  • This activated knowledge may then influence your thoughts and feelings toward the new individual
    → p.ex: the way you treat this new colleague will be influenced by the fact that they remind you of this friend
    → You may assume—even without realizing that you are doing so—that the new individual possesses qualities that are actually those that were possessed by your past acquaintance
    → SO, you may transfer this schema of your friend onto your new colleague
21
Q

Kosfeld et al. (2005) gave some people oxytocin before they played a financial game that provided a measure of their degree of trust in a second player; what were the results of this study?

A
  • Results revealed that people who received oxytocin made financial decision that indicated higher levels of trust in the other player
22
Q

What were the results of Žužul’s (2008) research on defensive pessimism in romantic relationships?

A
  • Defensive pessimists do not feel better than optimists following a break-up
    → even if they prepare for the worst and think they’re going to be more prepared for this breakup, they’re actually not better off when it comes to it
    → doesn’t lead to higher well-being in the end
  • Defensive pessimism seems to slow the recovery process after a break-up
  • Optimists recover faster from break-ups
  • Defensive pessimists are also less satisfied with their partners and relationships during the relationship
23
Q

What are the advantages and disadvantages of defensive pessimism in academics?

A
  • Academic optimists and defensive pessimists did equally well at school (as measured by GPA)
  • Academic optimists:
    → Academic success predicted by positive thinking
    → p.ex: if you expect to have a high GPA, it does have an effect on the GPA
  • Academic defensive pessimists:
    → Expectations about academic performance at the beginning of the year were unrelated to end-of-year grade
    → expectations are thus not relevant here
    → p.ex: if you expect to have a low GPA, it doesn’t have an effect on the actual GPA
    → Large actual-ideal self-discrepancies predicted higher, not lower, academic attainment
    → struggle more with mental healt
24
Q

How is defensive pessimists well-being?

A
  • They do have lower self-esteem, but it is not negative across the board, it can be good in some contexts
    → these people may also engage in self-handicapping; protecting your self-esteem by expecting the worst