chap. 7 Flashcards
What is the trait concept? (what is a trait, its connotations…)
- Personality traits refer to consistent patterns in the way individuals behave, feel, and think
- Traits summarize a person’s typical behaviour and thus describe what a person typically is like (what you typically do is what you’re typically like)- Two connotations:
1) Consistency: trait describes a regularity in behaviour, across time and situations
2) Distinctiveness: trait theorists typically concerned with ways in which individuals differ from each other
What does the decision to build a personality theory on traits imply?
- that individuals are consistent in spite of the changes presented by social life
→ People possess psychological qualities that endure across time and place
What are the 3 scientific functions served by trait constructs?
- Description: Needs to describe what a person is typically like
- Prediction: Needs to predict everyday behaviour and aspects of personal environment
- Explanation: Need to explain behaviour
What does it mean to be able to describe a personality using trait theory?
- Trait theories could be seen as providing basic descriptive facts that need to be explained by any theory of personality
- Most trait theorists try to establish an overall descriptive scheme within which any and all persons can be described
- They try to establish a personality taxonomy – a scientist’s way of classifying the things being studied; in a taxonomy, ALL of the traits have to be used to describe a person
→ p.ex: 5 traits theory can be taken and used to explain any person’s personality
What is a personality taxonomy?
- Used in trait theories
- It is a scientist’s way of classifying the things being studied; in a taxonomy, ALL of the traits have to be used to describe a person
What does it mean to be able to predict a personality using trait theory?
- With traits, one should be able to predict things such as everyday behaviour and aspects of personal environments
- With traits, one can often make predictions that have important practical value – for example, predicting which applicants will be most appropriate for a job
→ p.ex: someone high on emotional stability would be good for bomb diffusion
What does it mean to be able to explain a personality using trait theory?
- This is the most challenging for a scientific theory
- Some trait theories confine themselves by using traits to describe and predict, without being able to explain, this is a limitation to trait theories
- Some trait theorists suggest that trait constructs can be used to explain a person’s behavior.
–> p.ex: One might say that a student shows up on time for class and takes good lecture notes because the person is high on the trait of conscientiousness - Others treat traits as if they can explain by identifying biological factors that underlie traits
- Most trait theorists believe that inherited biological factors are a primary determinant of individual differences in traits
Explain the hierarchical organization of personality.
- Eysenck suggests 4 levels:
1) Specific response level - These are particular ways you respond to things in your environment
2) Habitual response level - However, some of these responses are linked together and form more general habits
3) Trait level - Groups of habits that tend to occur
together form traits
–> For example, people who prefer meeting people to reading also generally enjoy themselves at a lively party (habitual response); this bit of information suggests that these two habits can be grouped together under the trait of sociability
4) High order factors (superfactors) - traits, but at the highest, most abstract level of generalization
Explain Gordon Allport’s trait theory and its componenents.
- Allport distinguishes personality traits from temporary states and activities
- He identifies 3 types of traits
1) Cardinal traits express dispositions that are so pervasive that virtually every act is traceable to its influence - Every act you engage in can be traced back to this trait
- p.ex: being “machiavellian” is about a man with the name, thus is expressions were all traced back to this one trait that it was named after him
- Not a very supported concept, people don’t typically have these
2) Central traits express dispositions that cover a more limited range of situations - p.ex: kindness, sociable, lively
3) Secondary dispositions are traits that are the least conspicuous, generalized, and consistent - people possess traits with varying degrees of significance and generality
- These are things that occur in very specific situations, specific traits
What were some of Allport’s beliefs about the expression of traits in varying situations that were different from other trait theorists?
- Allport recognized the importance of the situation in explaining why a person does not behave the same way all the time (contrary to other theorists)
–> He recognized that “traits are often aroused in one situation and not in another”, for example, even the most introverted person may behave in an extraverted fashion in certain situations - Felt that both trait and situation concepts are necessary to understand behaviour
- Traits are necessary to explain consistency, whereas situations are necessary to explain variability
→ p.ex: someone who is moderate to high on extraversion will have different behaviour when in a social setting rather than when they’re at home doing work
→ in one context, they’ll use the extraversion - A trait expresses what a person generally does over many situations, not what will be done in any one situation
What is idiographic research from Allport’s theory?
- Focus is on the potentially unique individual
- In-depth studies of individual persons are viewed as a path for learning about people generally
- Contrasts with other trait theorists, who generally adopt nomothetic procedures in which large numbers of individuals are described in terms of a common universal set of personality traits
What are some critiques of Allport’s theory?
- Clarified the trait concept but did little research to establish the utility of specific trait concepts because it can’t be applied to other people
- Believed that many traits were hereditary, but did no research to substantiate this
- Documented that people display unique and consistent patterns of trait-related behaviour, but provided no detailed processing model to explain that behaviour
What statistical tool is used by trait theorists for summarizing the ways in which a large number of variables are correlated?
Factor analysis
How is factor analysis used in trait theory? Give an example
- In a typical factor-analytic study, a large number of test items are administered to many subjects
- Some items will be positively correlated with one another, others will be negatively correlated
- These correlations might reflect the influence of an underlying “factor”
→ the correlations explain why some of the traits are related - For example, we might find correlated statements which reflect the influence of an underlying factor or trait, such as neuroticism
Of the big 5, what do these statements relate to?
→ I find that I often worry about the future
→ I tend to not adjust well to new routines
→ If something upsets me, I do my best to try not to think about it
Neuroticism
Of the big 5, what do these statements relate to?
→ I find that I’m happiest when I’m with other people
→ I like to be in the midst of a lot of activity
→ I have no trouble showing affection for people
Extraversion
Of the big 5, what do these statements relate to?
→ People can count on me to get a job done well
→ It is important that my work area be very organized
→ I believe that punctuality is a sign of good character
Conscientiousness
Of the big 5, what do these statements relate to?
→ I get along with many people
→ I like to pitch in and help whenever possible
→ I find I am able to forgive others rather easily
Agreeableness