Cognitive - Savage-Rumbaugh Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

What was the main aim of this study?

A

The main aim was to describe the language acquisition of two Pygmy chimps in the first instance without training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

What was the main focus of this study?

A

Language acquisition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the secondary aim?

A

To compare language capabilities of the Pygmy chimps with some common chimps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research method of the first aim?

A

Longitudinal Case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Research method of the secondary aim?

A

Quasi experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the sample technique?

A

Opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the sample used in this study

A

Two Pygmy chimps, one Kanzi (make) and the other Mulika (female). Both were born in captivity and had contact with their mother Matata.
Also, two common chimps names Sherman and Austin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main research aim IV and DV?

A

Had none

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Secondary research aim IV and DV?

A

IV- sources of the chimp

DV- the amount of language acquired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Controls of this study

A
  • Video tapes and a computer recordings all data.
  • Along with the fact the observer didn’t know the data would be used for reliability - meaning no fraud of it.
  • Then there had to be 100% agreement on all decisions and on the trips the independent clarifier was unaware of where to go
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the procedure

A
  • the use of a electrical, synthesised lexigram which lit up when touched, and a board when outside
  • showed interest since 1 and a half years old due to Matata
  • compared to the common chimps who had no outside lexigram or synthesiser
  • food places at 17 locations. Could pick what food they wanted and walk there
  • complete record of kanzi’s utterances for 17 months
  • each word had to be spontaneous or in a correct context to count
  • Kanzi and Mulika were tested on their words with a visual and aural test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline the results of this study

A
  • Kanzi and Mulika used gestures to communicate
  • had no trouble using the lexigram of moves or altered
  • Kanzi acquired 46 words, Mulika acquired 37
  • Kanzi produced 2,540 combinations with only 10 being wrong
  • 80% of utterances were spontaneous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline some conclusions of the study

A
  • the Pygmy chimps learned to use utterances spontaneously

- the acquisition of language is easier in Pygmy than common chimp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline practical applications of this study

A

Helps us understand our closest living relative in more detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluate the ethics of this study

A

On one hand the conditions they lived in represented their natural environment, on the other hand they were born in captivity - and had lots of human contact, not with their own kind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate the ecological validity of this study

A

On one hand they did natural things which monkeys do in the wild - like play and eat. In the other they were studied in a humanised environment, which isn’t natural for them

16
Q

What data types were used in this study?

A

Quantitative - the lexigram utterances, words learnt

Qualitative - combos and gestures

17
Q

Two strengths of the study

A
  • longitudinal case study

- both data types collected

18
Q

Two disadvantages of the study

A
  • environments were not identical

- small sample size

19
Q

Outline two changes to this study

A
  • increase the sample size

- rear chimps in identical environments