Cognitive Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Cognitive Approach

A

Mental processes needed to make sense of the world. Cognitive psychologists believe that behavior is influenced by cognition, so they way we perceive and think determines the way we behave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 cognitive assumptions

A

1 - Information processing model - describes the flow of information using the terms input, process and output.
2 - Human mind is like a computer. A computer is also and information processor - we input information via a keyboard, then the information is processed and can be stored on a hard drive, and an output in the form of sound, print out of email can be made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lab experiment

A

study conducted in a tightly controlled environment, where the independent variable is directly measurable by the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Field experiment

A

Field experiment is similar to lab but carried out in a natural environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Natural experiment

A

Similar to filed experiment but the independent variable is not manipulated directly by the researcher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Experimental hypothesis

A

Statement made about the predicted outcome of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Directional hypothesis

A

Predicts the likely direction of the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-directional hypothesis

A

States that a difference or relationship will be found but its direction could go either way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Null hypothesis

A

Statement that the results will be due to chance not to what was predicted. Whether the difference is big enough to accept that no other factors played a part.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Independent variable

A

IV is the variable that is manipulated or changed in order to demonstrate a difference between the experimental conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dependent variable

A

The DV is the variable that is measured or the result of the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Operationalisation

A

Once you have decided on the IV and DV of a study, it is important to make an operational definition of both, defining precisely how you intend to measure the DV and alter the conditions of the IV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Independent measures design

A

When only one of the experimental conditions is tested on a group of participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Repeated measures

A

Same participants are used in all experimental conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Matched pairs

A

Essentially the same as an independent measures design but all participants are matched on a quality of characteristic important to the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Any variable, other than the IV, that can have an influence on your findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Situational variable

A

Extraneous variable that might affect your results found in the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Participant variables

A

Participants themselves may affect the results of the study - some are highly motivated, easily distracted etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Ecological validity

A

How well a study represents a natural situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Experimenter effects

A

Subtle cues, expectations, gender and personality type of the researcher may influence the way a participant responds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Demand Characteristics

A

Human participants may respond to the experimental conditions in which they are involved.Humans are not passive, and they may change their normal behavior in unusual situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Objectivity

A

Being objective refers to being detached or neutral in terms of judgement, without the influence of personal interpretation or emotion.

23
Q

Reliability

A

Reliability is achieved when a study is repeated and the same results are found

24
Q

Construct validity

A

How well a measure being used is a good indicator of what is supposed to be studied.

25
Q

Craik and Lockhart

A

MOM - Types of rehearsal maintenance rehearsal means we rehearse information in order to preserve it for a short time. Elaborative rehearsal refers to a deep consideration of the information, often by giving it meaning, resulting in a more durable memory.

26
Q

Craik and Lockhart Part 2

A

Information processing - we have a central processor that handles all kinds and quantities of perceptual information and determines how it is processed. Distinctive, relevant information it is likely to be processed at a deeper level

27
Q

Craik and Lockhart Eval Support

A

Hyde and Jenkins (73) asked participants to learn a set of 24 words under five different conditions which required different levels of processing. There was significance increase in recall when participants were asked to judge pleasantness of the world

28
Q

C + L advantages

A

Applications are wide. accounts for the diversity of memories stored.

29
Q

C + L Disadvantages

A

Many variables determine whether a durable memory is achieved. It can only be used to explain improved recall in memory that requires conscious recall. It has been criticized for being descriptive rather than explaining how memory works and it does not account for all leaning

30
Q

C + L disadvantage study

A

Morris et al (97) found participants recalled more words that were phonetically processed than semantically processed.

31
Q

Craik and Tulving (1975) aim

A

To see whether material, which had been more deeply processed, would be recalled better.

32
Q

C + T procedure

A

24 participants shown 60 words via tachistoscope and asked questions that required structural, phonetic or semantic processed. Then asked to recognize words from a list of 180 words containing the original 60.

33
Q

C + T results

A

17% at structural level, 36% of words processed at phonetic level and 65% processed at semantic level.

34
Q

Multi Store Model (Atkinson and Shiffrin, 68, 71)

A

Three stores - Sensory - buffer for all information in environment that bombards our perceptual system . Hold information for a brief period. STM is a limited store for attended information, holding about 7 bits to around 18 for 30 seconds. Rehearsal here leads to LTM, which has a potentially infinite capacity and can hold memories for minutes or many years.

35
Q

MSM advantages

A

Glanzer and Cunitz (1996) - first words recalled well, primacy effect and last words remembered well - recency effect with ones in middle forgotten. Clive Wearing shows damage to hippo campus can result in failure to store STM.

36
Q

MSM disadvantages

A

Hard to say what capacity means If you use a span test you can remember 20 items in STM. Experiments to test it are usually artificial

37
Q

Cue dependent Forgetting

A

When we encode a new memory we also store information that occurred around it, if we can’t remember its because we are not in a similar situation

38
Q

Tulving’s encoding specificity principle

A

‘The greater the similarity between the encoding event and the retrieval event, the greater the likelihood of recalling the original memory’

39
Q

Tip of the Tongue Phenomenon.

A

Brown and McNeill, 66 - Knowing that a memory exists but being temporarily unable to recall it.

40
Q

Context dependent forgetting

A

Context is a powerful aid to recall. If we are not in the same situation as when learning, we may not be able to access the memory easily. e.g. Godden and Baddeley

41
Q

Smith (85)

A

54 participants list of words to learn with either Mozart or jazz playing in the background or it was quiet. 2 days later the participants were asked to recall the words again in quite, Mozart or Jazz backgrounds. Forgetting occurred when the background was not the same

42
Q

State dependent forgetting

A

When we learn information, we also encode details about our emotional and physical state at the time.

43
Q

Duka et al (2000)

A

48 participants alcohol or placebo, prior to list of 40 word pairs. Participants were either in 1 of 4 conditions: alcohol-alcohol, alcohol-placebo, placebo-alcohol or placebo-placebo. Duka found recollection of the worlds was better if the same state for learning was in place for recall.

44
Q

Cue-Dependent Evaluation

A

Both Godden and Baddeley and Abernathy (1940) demonstrated cue dependent forgetting in a natural environment. A meta analysis by Smith and Vela (2001) on 75 experiments of context-dependent forgetting between 1935 and 1997. Across all studies they found the reinstatement of context, did play an important role in remembering

45
Q

Interference Theory

A

In LTM, forgetting may occur due to interference or confusion between old and new memory. This might not mean its lost but has become distorted or changed.

46
Q

Retroactive interference

A

Difficulty recalling old information because of newly learnt information interfering.

47
Q

Proactive interference

A

Difficulty of learning new information due to already exiting information interfering.

48
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931)

A

Gave participants a list of 10 words to learn until they were able to recall them all accurately. Then required to rest for 10 minutes, learn a list of 3 digit numbers, list of nonsense syllables, or list of antonyms or synonyms of the original list. They found the more similar the new information was to the old memory the lower recall became.

49
Q

Godden and Baddeley (1975) Aim

A

To investigate whether a natural environment can act as a cue for recall

50
Q

G + B details.

A

18 participants fro university club. Learn a list of 38 unrelated 2 or 3 syllable words. Open water site in Oban. Each diver experienced all conditions.

51
Q

G + B conditions

A

Learn on dry and recall on dry, lean underwater and recall underwater, learn on dry and recall underwater, learn underwater and recall on dry.

52
Q

G + B what participants actually did

A

Tested 2 at a time, divers were submerged and played tape recording of word list. Recorded words were presented in blocks of 3 , with a 4 second interval . Each list was presented twice and after a 4 minute delay the participants had to write down the words, in any order, in 2 mins.

53
Q

G + B results

A

Recall was around 50% higher when it took place in the same environment as learning. The mean number of words recalled in the dry land learning and recall condition was 13.5 and 11.4 for underwater learning and recall, contrasted with 8.4 in underwater leaning and dry recall, and 8.6 for dry learning and underwater recall.