coding capacity duration Flashcards

1
Q

sensory memory

A

initial contact for stimuli
- only capable of retaining information for a very short time`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

short term memory

A
  • the information we are currently aware of/thinking about
  • comes from paying attention to sensory memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

long term memory

A
  • continual storage of information which is largely outside of our awareness, but can be called into working memory to be used when needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

coding

A

how the information is processed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

capacity

A

how much can be stored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

duration

A

the amount of time information stays in the memory store for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

duration in SM

A

millisecond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

duration in STM

A

15-30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

duration in LTM

A

unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

capacity in SM

A

very large (composed of all your senses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

capacity in STM

A

5-9 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

capacity in LTM

A

unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

coding in SM

A

depends on sense organ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

coding in STM

A

acoustically - sounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

coding in LTM

A

semantically - meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

research on coding

A

Baddeley:
- different lists of words to 4 groups of pts to remember
- G1: acoustically similar
- G2: “”””””””””” dissimilar
- G3: semantically similar
- G4 “””””””””””””””” dissimilar

pts were shown the original words and asked to recall them in the correct order
- when they did this task immediately (from STM) they tended to do worse with acoustically similar words
- when they recalled the list after 20 minutes (LTM), they did worse with semantically similar words
- suggests that STM is acoustic and LTM is semantic

17
Q

research on capacity

A

digit span: Jacobs
- researchers read out 4 digits and the pt recalls these out loud in the correct order
- if this is correct, the researcher reads out 5 digits and so on until the pt cannot recall the order correctly -> this indicates the individuals digit span

found that the mean span for digits across all pts was 9-3 items, the mean span for letters was 7.3

18
Q

research on capacity: memory chunking

A

Miller made observations of everyday practice
- noted things come in 7s, 7 notes in music, 7 days of week, 7 sins ect.
- though that the span for STM was 7 +- 2, but noted people can recall 5 words as easily as they can recall 5 letters
- we do this by chunking, grouping sets of digits or letters into units or chunks

19
Q

research on duration: STM

A

Peterson + Peterson
- tested 24 students in 8 trials
- on each trial the student was given a consonant syllable - YPG - to remember
- also given a 3 digit number
- student counted backwards from this number until told to stop > this was to prevent any mental rehearsal of the consonant syllable

  • on each trial they were told to stop after varying periods of time: 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds
  • after 3s the average recall was 80%, after 18s it was 3%
  • findings suggested that STM duration may be about 18 seconds, unless we are able to have verbal rehersal
20
Q

research on duration: LTM

A

Bahrick et al
- 392 American participants ages between 17 and 74
- high school yearbooks were obtained from the pts or directly from schools
- recall tested in various ways:
> photo-recognition test consisting of 50 photos, some of which the pt went to highschool with
» free recall test where pts recalled all the names of their graduating class

  • those within 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate in photo recognition, after 48 years declined to 70$
  • free-recall was less accurate than recognition: 60% after 15 years, dropping to 30% after 48 years

shows LTM may last up to a lifetime for some material

21
Q

strength of Badeley

A

identified a clear difference between memory store, led to an important step in our understanding of memory and helped lead to the understanding/development of the multi-store model

22
Q

limitation of Badeley

A

artificial stimuli
- didn’t use meaningful material
- word lists had no personal meanings to the pts, may not tell us much about significant and regular tasks that we do in everyday life
- when processing more meaningful information people may use semantic coding even for STM tasks
» overall, limited application

23
Q

strength of Jacobs

A
  • very old study so had potential lack of adequate controls, some pts digit spans might have been underestimated because they were distracted during testing (confounding variable)
  • however better controlled studies such as Bopp and Verhaeghen) found similar results
  • valid test
24
Q

limtiation of Peterson

A

artificial material

25
Q

strength of Bahrick

A

high external validity, meaningful memories