CLP 5 - Witnesses Flashcards
Is a defendant competent to be a prosecution witness?
No - therefore cannot be compelled by prosecution. Unless they have plead guilty when they may be called as a witness by the prosecution against a co defendant.
Is a defendant competent to be a DEFENSE witness for another defendant?
Yes but they cannot be compelled to do so.
Are children/ those with a disorder competent to be witnesses?
Yes, if:
- they understand the questions AND
- they can give comprehensible answers
If competent, they can be compelled
Can a spouse be competent witness
Yes
Can Deaf or speech impaired people be witnesses?
Yes as long as they understand the solemnity of taking oath
if competent, they are compellable
When can a spouse be compelled to give evidence for the prosecution?
Only for:
- domestic violence
- assault or injury to a child under 16
- sexual offence against someone under 16
- attempts, conspiring, aiding and abetting of any of the above.
When can a witness give an opinion rather than a fact?
- the opinion is in relation to a common place occurrence about which the witness’s perception appears relevant and proper
- they’re an expert.
Can a witness (who is not the defendant) refuse to give evidence if it might incriminate him?
Yes
When can a jury be instructed to accept expert opinion as correct?
when the expert opinion and all the other evidence leads inevitably to only one conclusion.
What are the two types of legal professional privilege to consider
Litigation privilege, and
legal advice privilege
when can a child take an oath / affirmation?
have sufficient appreciation of the solemnity of taking oath
What is the remedy if one refuses to take an oath/affirmation
contempt of court
Can questions be leading for examination in chief?
no - the response may be inadmissible or carry less weight
what is a hostile witness?
one that the judge forms the view that they are not desirous of telling the truth
What does a hostile witness allow?
Witness statement can be put to the witness and inconsistencies used to prove the truth of the statement notwithstanding the statement was not made under oath in court