Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer AUA Guideline 2017 Flashcards
what does AUA say for number of cores that can be positive for the very low risk localized prostate cancer?
no more than 1/3 positive.
so for extended template no more than 4.
the 2 that is mentioned in the text is in a sextant biopsy. targeted biopsies should not be included in this count
if someone has a tumor that is more than 0.2 ml on imaging does that mean they are not very low risk?
they can still be if they meet other criteria
what is very low risk localized prostate ca as per this guideline?
PSA <10 ng/ml AND Grade Group 1 AND clinical stage T1-T2a AND <34% of biopsy cores positive AND no core with >50% involved, AND PSA density <0.15 ng/ml/cc
what is low risk localized prostate ca as per this guideline?
PSA <10 ng/ml AND Grade Group 1 AND clinical stage T1-T2a
what is intermediate risk localized prostate ca as per this guideline?
PSA 10-<20 ng/ml OR Grade Group 2-3 OR clinical stage T2b-c
what is favorable intermediate risk localized prostate ca as per this guideline?
Favorable: Grade Group 1 (with PSA 10-<20) OR Grade Group 2 (with PSA<10)
what is unfavorable intermediate risk localized prostate ca as per this guideline?
Unfavorable: Grade Group 2 (with either PSA 10-<20 or clinical stage T2b-c) OR Grade Group 3 (with PSA < 20
what is high risk localized prostate ca as per this guideline?
PSA >20 ng/ml OR Grade Group 4-5 OR clinical stage >T3*
what should counselling of the patient include?
Cancer severity
Patient values and preferences
Life expectancy
pre-treatment general functional and GU symptoms
expected post treatment functional status
potential for salvage treatment
what are some patient related factors that are modifiable and patient should be counselled about?
smoking
obesity
associated with higher prostate cancer death and worse functional outcomes after.
Patients can delay therapy for a few months if appropriate to work on above.
frailty also associated with poor outcomes
functional status
Should physicians order CT or bone scan for staging of very low risk patients?
No
what should be the recommended treatment for men with very low risk prostate cancer?
Active surveillance
what is the metastatic progression rate of patients with very low risk prostate ca? what about low risk?
<1%
3%
what is the recommended option for most low risk patients?
Active surveillance
Which low risk patients should be offered RT or RP>
PSAD>0.15
Obesity (BMI)( >35)
Africa american race
Extensive GS 6 cancer on systematic biopsies
men with family history of aggressive prostate cancer
Can you use ADT in treatment of low risk localized prostate cancer?
not routinley
BUT can be used to shrink gland for Brachy
in RTOG 9408 addition of ADT for 4 months did not confer an OS benefit at 9 years. 2000 men in the study
List side effects of cryosurgery? does it work in comparison to AS?
survival benefit has not been shown in comparison to AS Side effects: ED should be expected (90%) Urinary retention irritative symptoms
Clinicians should inform low-risk prostate cancer patients who are considering focal therapy or high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)
that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking
Clinicians should recommend ——— for men with a life expectancy ≤5 years with low-risk localized prostate cancer.
observation or watchful waiting
Among most low-risk localized prostate cancer patients, tissue based genomic biomarkers
have not shown a clear role in the selection of candidates for active surveillance.
what are three genetic tissue assays approved by FDA for men with prostate cancer?
GEnomic classifier(GC): risk of mets
Genomic Prostate Score (GPS): risk of non organ confined disease
Cell Cycle Progression(CCP) : risk of death
What is the recommended staging for unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer?
CT scan/MRI and Bone scan
Clinicians should recommend ……….. as standard treatment options for patients with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
what were the findings of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4 (SPCG-4) and PIVOT? ( relating to intermediate risk disease)
SPCG-4: most patients were intermediate risk disease and there was a reduction of death from prostate cancer from 21% to 15% with RP at 10 years in comparison to watchful waiting.
PIVOT: no difference as per trial but subgroup analysis of intermediate risk patients should there was a benefit in RP vs watchful waiting.
what were the findings of ProtecT?
Active surv vs RT vs RP
most patients low risk
AS: 50% got treatment by 10 years
no difference in OS at 10 years
metastasis and prostate cancer progression lower in patients who recieved RT or RP
there are Meta analysis of retrospective data that suggest surgery patients may do better but no good RCT in this domain.
Clinicians should inform patients that favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer can be treated with radiation alone….
but that the evidence basis is less robust than for combining radiotherapy with ADT.
Describe twp RCT that are relevant for ADT + RT for Intermediate risk prostate cancer
RTOG 9408:
2000 men, 1000 intermediate
OS improved from 54% to 61% if 6 months of ADT was added to RT(66 gy), these days we use higher doses
EORTC 22991 added ADT to 78Gy RT and PFS improved but not OS. so seems to be beneficial with higher doses of radiation as well.
In which patient with intermediate risk prostate cancer can clinician consider cryosurgery?
patients with contraindications to more traditional therapies such as prostatectomy or radiotherapy
There is a lack of evidence for AS, cryosurgery or watchful waiting in this space.
Active surveillance …………. to select patients with favorable intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer;
may be offered
however, patients should be informed that this comes with a higher risk of developing metastases compared to definitive treatment.
For these patients MRI and biopsy should be done to make sure you are dealing with what you think you are dealing with.
Patients with small volume cancer on biopsy who have < 10% Gleason pattern 4 may reflect ……..
artifactual upgrading due to tangential cut of a Gleason 3 acinus, in which case the lumen is not seen and the pathologist’s impression is of a solid clump of cells (i.e. higher grade)