Clinical Swallow Evaluation (CSE) Flashcards

1
Q

Clinical Swallow Evaluation

A

Designed to provide the clinician with the
following info:
- Current medical dx
- Medical history
- Medical status
- Oral anatomy of patient
- Respiratory function
- Oromotor function
- Cognitive-Communicative status
- Patient reactions/symptoms during PO trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Swallow Screening

A
  • Used to determine the need for a full
    swallow evaluation and make further
    referrals
  • Screens are a “pass/fail” procedure (ASHA)
    Involves:
  • Review chart/client interview
  • Identify risk factors via observation and/or trial
    swallows
  • Identify warning signs
  • Identify signs and symptoms of dysphagia

Screening procedures attempt to answer: Is the person possibly dysphagic?

They do NOT answer the question: What is the nature of the patient’s physiology during the swallow?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of Swallow Screens

A
  • Modified Mann Assessment of Swallow
    Ability (MMASA)
  • Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST)
  • Gugging Swallow Screen (GUSS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Yale Swallow Protocol

A

(aka 3 Ounce Water Test)
- One of the most frequently used screening approaches
- Starts with simple cognitive screen and oral mech
- Ask the client to drink 3 ounces of water without
interruption
- Coughing, choking, wet-gurgly vocal quality during
test or 1 minute later-”fail screen”
- If fail water test, refer for CSE and possibly get MBS?
FEES? (Suiter & Leder , 2008)
- If “pass”- reg diet/thin liquids with dentures
- If edentulous, puree diet/ thin liquids
- If patient improves, retes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST)

A
  • Present 5- to 20-cc amounts of thin-liquid and
    pudding and nectar liquids
  • Monitor for s/s of swallow difficulty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indications for CSE

A
  • For any patient referred for assessment of
    suspected swallowing problem
  • Usually occurs when patient, caregiver,
    family, feeder, and/or physician express
    concerns with eating/swallowing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the goal of the CSE…?

A
  • To form a working hypothesis of the problem
  • Begins the process towards treatment
    strategy recommendations
  • But unfortunately, we do NOT have X-Ray
    vision so the CSE is limited….let’s discuss!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Components of CSE

A
  • Thorough Chart Review
  • Obtain case history
  • Oral-motor exam
  • Assess structural and functional integrity
  • Assess safety of oral feeding via PO trials
  • Determine need for additional diagnostic
    tests and/or referrals
  • Gather baseline data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Parts of Case history

A
  • Current Medical Diagnosis
  • Chief Complaint (e.g. duration, frequency)
  • Reason for Referral
  • Medical and surgical history
  • Swallowing history
  • Respiratory status (labored breathing? On oxygen?)
  • Medications
  • Observations (e.g., cognitive status, voice quality,
    fatigue)
  • Staff and family observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Common Clinical Findings in People
with Dysphagia

A

General Health Status:
- weight loss
- fluctuation low fever
- pulmonary infiltrates
- increased or insufficient oropharyngeal secretion
- lacking teeth
- drooling
- ineffective cough
Behaviors of Observations During Mealtimes
- resistance to eating/drinking
- increased time to consume meal
- oral residue
- difficulty in swallowing foods of specific texture
- complaint of food stuck in throat
- coughing or choking during or after swallow
- wet vocal quality during or after mealtime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Patient Interview

A

Patient Self-Perception/QOL Questionnaires:
- SWAL-QOL & SWAL-CARE (McHorney et al., 2006)
- EAT-10 (Belafsky et al., 2008)
- Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ; Wallace et
al., 2000);
- MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI; Chen
et al., 2001)
- Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI; Silbergleit et al.
2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Other things to consider

A
  • Method & Schedule of Feeding/Eating
  • Current Diet: Functional Oral Intake Scale
  • Variability: Foods, Eating Time, Temperature, Secretions
  • Compensations: Rate, Consistency, Posture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Assessing Cognitive-Communication During CSE

A
  • Alertness/Arousal/Consciousness
  • Speech (Dysarthria? Apraxia?)
  • Voice (dysphonia?)
  • Language (Comprehension? Expression?)
  • Cognitive-linguistic skills: attention, memory, following directions (1,2,3 step), problem solving, safety awareness, insight
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Equipment for CSE

A
  • Pen and paper
  • Small flashlight
  • Tongue blades
  • Lateral view diagram of anatomy (useful to explain normal swallow)
  • Spoons/cup/straw
  • Food/liquids (e.g., water, ice chips, thick liquid, puree, soft solid, crackers)
  • Emesis basin, washcloth, or paper towels (just in case!)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Oral Peripheral Examination

A
  • Oral motor structure and function
  • Inspect oral cavity for xerostomia, appearance or oral mucosa, dentition

Cranial Nerve Assessment:
- Facial symmetry
- Labial, lingual, and buccal structure and function:
- Symmetry
- Range of motion (ROM)
- Strength
- Precision
- Coordination
- Sensation

  • Velopharyngeal structure and function: some physicians still think no gag = no swallow (yikes)
  • Laryngeal function: voice (quality/loudness/pitch), strength of cough/throat clear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Swallowing Assessment

A
  • Controlled trials of food
  • Assess acceptance of food, chewing and bolus manipulation, timeliness of movements, signs/ symptoms of aspiration
  • Palpate submandibular, hyoid, laryngeal movements

Other techniques used by some (with caution!)
* Cervical auscultation-normal swallow sounds are “crisp”,
abnormal swallow sounds are “bubbly” (very controversial!)
* Pulse Oximetry – measure oxygen saturation level (SpO2) of hemoglobin in blood, may help in identifying aspiration, normal range >90% (though several factors impact readings…

17
Q

Assessment of Liquid/Food Trials

A
  • Dry swallow: Saliva
  • Controlled trials of food
  • Liquids: Thin, Thickened liquids (nectar-thick, honey-thick), Pudding, Solids: Puree, Ground/ Mechanical Soft solid, Solid

*Liquid or solid food trials should only be attempted if
patient is deemed safe to attempt PO

18
Q

Assessment of Food Trials via Standardized Measure

A
  • Test of Mastication and Swallowing
    Solids (TOMASS)
  • Quantifiable measure of oral preparatory
    phase: Number of masticatory cycles per cracker, Number of swallows per cracker, Total time to ingest cracker
  • Normative data available for various crackers (including Nabisco Saltines)
19
Q

More Standardized Bedside
Swallow Assessments

A
  • Clinical Observational Dysphagia Assessment (CODA)
  • Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA)
  • Swallowing Ability and Function Evaluation (SAFE)
20
Q

Signs/Symptoms of Dysphagia

A
  • Difficulty recognizing food
  • Difficulty controlling food/ liquid
  • Difficulty controlling saliva
  • Coughing/Throat Clearing
  • Change in vocal quality
  • Abnormal volitional cough
  • Dysphonia
  • Dysarthria
  • Cough after swallow
  • Abnormal gag reflex
21
Q

Assessing Compensation during CSE

A

Compensatory strategies:
- Address the sign
- But do we really know this info on the CSE?
- How do we know the compensation is truly working?

22
Q

Impressions & Recommendations

A
  • Summary should provide an impression of factors that may impact and likely dictate further intervention
  • Indication of problems at pharyngeal stage of swallow will warrant an instrumental assessment; can say what you “suspect”, but cannot say for sure
  • E.g., Cannot say “Patient aspirated” during CSE
  • Provide baseline info re: swallow function to track and
    compare change over time
  • First and crucial step toward providing critical info
    relevant to both diagnostic & therapeutic process…
23
Q

Limitations of CSE

A
  • Doesn’t allow for evaluation of entire
    swallowing tract
  • Cannot tell you about timing of the swallow
    through pharynx or pharyngeal strength or if
    residue remains
  • Cannot provide definitive info about
    aspiration
  • HOWEVER, it still provides important info
  • Info obtained, in conjunction with instrumental
    exam, will facilitate and optimize appropriate tx decisions.
  • Cannot rule out aspiration
  • 50-60% of patients who aspirate do not respond to aspiration with e.g. a cough (“silent aspiration”)
  • 40% of patients with aspiration are not adequately
    diagnosed at bedside (Logemann, 1997)
  • Provides limited information on the
    physiological impairments underlying dysphagia
24
Q

Summary of CSE

A
  • Develop a rapport with the patient, family,
    caregivers, and team to better serve them ongoingly.
  • Assess the patient’s cognitive-linguistic status,
    especially orientation and ability to follow
    commands.
  • Deficits in these areas have been shown to increase
    the odds of aspiration (Leder, et al, 2009).
  • Assess oral motor status, especially lingual strength
    and range of motion.
  • Leder, Suiter, Murray & Rademaker (2013) found
    patients with decreased lingual range of motion had a
    higher aspiration risk.
  • Analyze the speech and voice.
    Develop a hypothesis regarding the patient’s ability to take in food, liquid, and medications effectively and safely.
  • Make good judgements as to when a patient requires an instrumental examination (MBSS or FEES)
  • Train, educate and counsel the patient, family,
    caregivers and medical team regarding the safest
    interventions to take prior to instrumental testing.
  • If the patient refuses further testing, and especially in
    instances of palliative care, you may be able to help them
    “aspirate more safely”
  • Trial interventions. Train and prepare the patient for the
    next steps (i.e., prepare them for the instrumental
    testing)
  • All of this is a holistic approach to dysphagia
    management