clinical reasoning Flashcards
By any other name…..
Clinical reasoning (landmark studies in 1980’s and 1990’s)
Professional reasoning
Therapeutic reasoning
Professional and therapeutic reasoning used to de-emphasize medical model and settings, and encompass educational settings and wellness models. Although all are acceptable, clinical reasoning is still the widely accepted term.
Metacognition
Metacognition: thinking about thinking, aware of the cognitive process of reasoning rather than just acting without reflection. Requires conscious thought and reflection
Clinical reasoning is NOT an intervention technique or a theory; it is the process of thinking that is informed by theory, observation, experience to direct and frame intervention
clinical reasoning
PROCESS of providing and directing services
HOW and WHY we do what we do
Cognitive processes of therapist / metacognition
Reflection on client care
a form of artistry, difficult for the novice to master, and relies on clinician experience, conscious reflection, critical analysis and self-criticism to develop this complex set of skills (Rogers, 1983)
“largely tacit, highly imagistic, and deeply phenomenological mode of thinking” (Mattingly, 1991, p. 979)
Clinical Reasoning Contributors
Observation, evaluation of occupational performance Assessments, including client factors Gathering complete data Understanding impact of context Therapeutic use of self, interviewing Tacit information and knowledge Experience
how to inform reasoning
Therapist uses their own sensory information to inform reasoning (what does client feel like, ie tone, how much physical assistance do we provide, etc.)
Therapeutic use of self needed to get best information
Assessments
Assessments: standardized, non-standardized, choose what is relevant. Just make sure to get enough data to make informed decisions.
context
Context: may need to find out what home is like for client, what environments and supports will influence occupational performance.
tacit
Tacit – implied, unspoken. What do you “feel” or how does your intuition influence the case?
Clinical Reasoning involves…
Gathering, understanding and integrating information based on:
- Prior experience
- Knowledge of condition
- OT theory
- OT process
- Paradigms / procedures
experience
Experience: What have been key issues for people with these conditions in the past? What are the things that might contribute to understanding of prognosis? From similar patients, what are the current expectations? How do the therapists frame or “chunk” information from the past to understand the current client?
knowledge
Knowledge: What are typical deficits of this condition? What should be included in assessment and intervention?
ot theory
OT Theory: provide a structure for framing and understanding the deficits and developing interventions that fit those problems and their causes. Theory used more in unfamiliar settings or with new conditions, when experience is limited.
ot process
OT Process: development of interventions based on assessment / evaluation data
Paradigm / Protocols / Procedures:
Paradigm / Protocols / Procedures: how are things done at that setting? What personal theories or perspectives influence how you work with individuals?
Cognitive Processes
Organization of information into frames / chunks and that promote scripts.
- Cue acquisition
- Pattern recognition
- Problem and asset formulation
- Prioritization
- Problem solution
Framing / chunking information
Framing / chunking information
- Decide what the issues might be for this patient, based on all the pieces of clinical reasoning (from last slide)
- Relies on therapist’s memory and making connections between past clients, knowledge, and current observations / assessments
- Frames support effective information processing
Cue acquisition:
Cue acquisition: Find the most relevant and useful information, based on cues from the client (what they say or do, may be formal or informal cues). Search for targeted information
Pattern recognition:
Pattern recognition: what are similarities / differences when compared to past clients?
Problem / asset formulation (only problems in text):
Problem / asset formulation (only problems in text): understanding what is going on with current client; what the main problems are that may be addressed in therapy, and what strengths / supports the client has that may support.
Prioritization:
Prioritization: given constraints of setting / time, what is important to address first? Should there be a focus on the overall functional skills (top down approach) or the client factors and performance skills that make up function (bottom up approach)
Problem solution:
Identify course of action / intervention
Therapist as Multi-tasker
Concurrent and conditional processes of:
- Scientific reasoning
- Procedural reasoning
- Narrative reasoning
- Interactive reasoning
- Pragmatic reasoning
- Ethical reasoning
scientific reasoning
Scientific: based on knowledge of diagnosis, review of evidence (usually assumes Diagnostic reasoning as well – this is explicit in Willard and Spackman).
procedural reasoning
Procedural: included as type of scientific in Willard and Spackman, separate in most other sources. What are the protocols or routines for specific conditions? What procedures must be followed for safety?