clinical psychology Flashcards
what is clinical psychology
applied psychology
understanding, explaining, treating clinical disorders
used to increase quality of life for individuals
what is the HCPC
organisation that regulates clinical psychologists practice
set standards that clinicians must adhere to ensure their quality of practice is regulated, vulnerable patients are protected and receiving best possible care
5 main HCPC guidelines for clinicians
act in the best interest of the patient
being able to ensure quality of practice
able to maintain records appropiatley
work and communicate effectively with others
practice and follow ethical guidelines of practice
explain hcpc guideline act in best interst of patient (5)
dont allow sex/religion to influence how theyre treated
invlove patients in decisions of care if possible
dont do anything that could put patients in danger
break confidentiality if patient is at risk
communicate with other providers such as mental health team so patient is fully undertstood
explain hcpc guideline ensure quality of practice (4)
follow ethical guidelines including confidentiality
only act within limits of knowledge, second opinion when necessary
regular training each year to ensure they’re up to date on knowledge
need masters degree with BPS qualification and a doctorate
explain hcpc guideline able to maintain records appropriately (6)
initials to keep anonyminity
online notes must be kept secure
in person notes must be locked
consent/informed about records
give necessary people access
accurate and comprehensive records
explain hcpc guideline work and communicate effectively with others (5)
if you feel the person is danger to themselves or others report to higher authority
talk about accurate information with team eg education
be welcoming for the patient
speak clearly and explain reason for each treatment
only act within limit of own skills
explain hcpc guideline practice and follow ethical guidelines of practice (7)
protection from harm
know ethical guidelines
competence
maintain anonyminity
protection from harm
involve patients in decisions
gain consent for treatment if not sectioned
what is used by clinicians to determine if someone’s behaviours are abnormal and need further diagnosis
4 D’s
list the 4 D’s
deviance
distress
dysfunction
danger
explain deviance
behaviours and emotions that are not seen as the norm in society and thus are seen as unacceptable
eg someone who is paranoid may experience hallucinations
explain distress
subjective experience of the individual when the behaviour is causing high levels of negative feelings
eg someone who is paranoid will experience extreme anxiety
explain dysfunction
person is unable to partake in everyday activities due to significant interference of behaviour
eg a paranoid person may not leave the house due to fear of persecution
explain danger
putting themselves or others lives at risk, thus requires intervention
eg someone who is paranoid may hurt others to protect themself
2 strength of the 4 D’s
DAVIS- difficult to measure when a behaviour is problematic enough to become a clinical diagnosis. the 4 D’s can help by mathcing to the DSM criteria t/f practical apps as used by clinician to decide when a condition may need a DSM diagnosis
VALIDITY OF DSM- various diagnosises using the DSM are shown to focus on specific Ds indicating each one holds importance, t/f supports validity of the DSM as a diagnosis
2 weaknesses of the 4 D’s
Subjective application- no clear measure of each D, what one professional views as dysfunctional such as not going to work might not be considered dysfunctional by another, t/f reducing the validity of using the 4 D’s as it requires subjective interpretation which could lead to misdiagnosis
Davis (2009) a 5th D- Duration is the length of time an individual has the symptoms eg having low mood for 2 days is different to 3 moths, t/f the 4 D’s are insufficient in themselves to diagnose
A01 classifying abnormal disorders
classifying mental health disorders involves grouping of symptoms into mental disorders in order to provide effective treatment
a classification system is a comprehensive list of categories including detailed descriptions of the symptoms
2 of the main classification systems are the DSM and ICD
what does DSM stand for
diagnostic and statistics manual of mental disorders
what does ICD stand for
international classification of disorders
what edition of DSM am i focusing on
DSM-IV-TR
how many categories in DSM IV TR
16 major categories
3 examples of categories in DSM IV TR
anxiety disorders
sleep disorders
eating disorders
what type of system is the DSM IV TR
multi axial system
individuals mental state is rated on 5 seperate dimensions
axes 1-3 deal with the individuals current condition
whereas 4-5 is about their life situation
what and how is the Global Assessment Functioning used in the DSM IV TR
axis 5 of DSM IV TR
determines psychological functioning
assigned number based on severity
areas examined include:
- psychological
- social
- occupational
ranked 1-100 in groups of 10 in relation to current period
increaesd score = better functioning
summarise the DSM IV TR
16 categories used to identify clinical disorders- eg anxiety disorders, sleep disorders, eating disorders
multi axial systems of classification (5th most important)
published in 2000
used to classify and diagnose clinical disorders
contains GAF in axis 5, high rank, better functioning
changes from DSM IV TR to DSM 5
elimination of multi axial system/GAF due to concpetual lack of clarity and questionable psychometric properties
disorder reclassification (eg mood disorders is now bipolar and related disorders OR depressive disorders)
eliminated disorders such as hyphocondriasis
added disorders such as gender dysphoria
changes to the ICD from manual 10 to 11
new chapters- eg sleep wake disorders
allows for more straightforward coding
french language now available
new disorders- eg binge eating disorders
harmonising with DSM
summarise the ICD 10
multilingual and multidisciplinary
section F contains mental health disorders
disorders coded with letters and numbers- alphanumerical
EG depression (F32), mild depression (F32.0)
also includes health disorders
ICD 10 can classify symptoms and diagnose disorders (physical and mental)
published by world health organisation
used by clinicians
reliability of classification systems (2)
interrate reliability: present the same case study to a variety of clinicians and assess the extent of agreement, if their is agreement is diagnosis then there is inter rate reliability
test re test reliability: assess the same patients two or more times and see if they receive the same diagnosis, (not over a long time period as symptoms may change due to improvement )
2 strengths of reliability of classification systems
Jakobsen et al- found there was agreement is the diagnosis of schizophrenia between the ICD 10 and other classification systems, t/f suggesting diagnosis can be repeated with the ICD and other classficiation systems to establish the same diagnosis, thus improving the reliability of the ICD 10 helping to ensure correct diagnosis and thus correct treatment
Andrews- assessed 1500 patients using the DSM IV and compared this to a diagnosis using the ICD, he found agreement on diagnosis for depression, substance dependence and generalised anxiety, t/f suggesting the DSM IV and ICD have established similar findings on the diagnosis of depression, substance dependence and anxiety thus increasing the reliability of these classificiation systems
2 weaknesses of reliability of classification systems
Unstructured interviews: clinicians gather information about their patients through undtructured clinical interviews meaning patients may provide different descriptions of sypmtoms to different practicioners, t/f making it harder to establish consistent findings and leading to unrelaible diagnosis when using classification systems
Subjective interpretations: the way a criterion is phrased within the DSM can be open to interpretation eg manic syndrome states that the mood must be abnormally and persistently elevated, t/f the same patient may not receive the same diagnosis when diagnosed by multiple clinicians decreasing test retest reliability
validity of classificiation systems (3)
Concurrent validity: system is consistent in diagnosis with a manual that has already been found to be valid
Predictive validity: valid system if it can predict the course of the illness accurately eg whether the patient is likely to recover
Construct validity: symptoms shown by the patient match symptoms considered to be present for that disorde and thus the symptoms in the manual must be representative of the illnesss
2 strengths of the validity of classification systems
Lee et al: found that for the diagnosis of ADHD there was agreement between the DSM IV and questionairre data t/f the DSM can be seen to have concurrent validity for ADHD
Powers et al: found that women who had suffered complex ptsd trauma also had high levels of alchohol and substance misuse as predicted by the ICD 11, t/f suggesting that the ICD 11 has predictive validity for the diagnosis of complex ptsd
2 weaknesses of the validity of classification systems
Rosenhan: all but one pseudo patient was diagnosed as schizophrenic and upon release 7 were given the diagnosis schizophrenic in remission using the DSM 2, t/f the DSM 2 lacks construct validity for schizophrenia as when using it 7 pseudo patients were misdiagnosed
Reductionist: the DSM and ICD split clinical disorders into lists of symptoms and features, this simplifies complex behaviours and reduces it down to a list, this may not be representative of everyone’s behaviour and not all individuals suffer from the disorder the same, t/f this can lead to incorrect diagnosis and ignoring opf individual differences and lack of a holistic approach, decreasing the validity of these classificiation sysrtems
A01 culturural issues with diagnosis
A language barrier is where a clinician and patient have differing native languages and are using a common language which is less easy for one or both patients to understand during treatment or diagnosis
Culturally bound syndromes are illnesses with a set of symptoms found and recognised as an illness in only one culture
The spiritual model is an understanding that if a clincian is from a different cultural background to their patient, some behaviours may be interperetted as abnormal even though they are not
Influence of cultural norms and stereorypes is where different psychiatrists may have variance in their teachings and thus may diagnose disorders differently leading to misdiagnosis
how may language barriers impact diagnosis (A03)
a language barrier may the understanding that the therapist has of the patients symptoms, if the symptoms descrivbed by the patient do not translate to the therapists native spoken language, t/f resulting in misdiagnosis or potentially no diagnosis if the symptoms are not recognised or lost in translation, suggesting culture influences diagnosis
how may culturally bound syndromes impact diagnosis (A03)
culturally bound syndromes may impact diagnosis as in some cultures diagnosis of certain symptoms may vary, eg ghost sickness in native america can be characterised by obessions with death, nightmares and tremors which could be diagnosed as manic in the uk, t/f resulting in misdiagnosis and inconsistent disorders throughout cultures suggesting culture does impact diagnosis
how may the spiritual model impact diagnosis (A03)
the spiritual model may impact diagnosis, littlewood and lipsedge found that calvin a rastaferian in the USA was arrested sue to his abnormal appreance seen as eccentric however in his culture this would be the normal way to dress, t/f diagnosis can be ethnocentric as their is no global definition for abnormality suggesting that culture impacts diagnosis
how may cultural norms and sterotypes impact diagnosis (A03)
cultural norms and stereotypes impact diagnosis because Cooper found that after the examinstion of 250 psychiatric admissions at hospitals in New York and London, they wwatched filmed interviews that used the DSM 2 and found in NY SZ was diagnosed 8x more than bipolar whereeas in London it was 1:1, therefore as the same syptoms did not result in the same diagnosis in the 2 countries, this suggests that culture influences diagnosis
A01 primary data in clinical psychology
primary data is information collected first hand by the researcher on mental health disorders, the researcher plans and conducts a study and collects and analyses the data specifically for their research hypoythesis, data can be qualitative or quantitative
methods used to collect:
unstructured interview
observation
first hand questionairres
strengths of primary data used in clinical psychology
data is fit for purpose: as the researcher conducts their own research and chooses the correct procedure they can produce data that fits their research hypothesis, t/f primary data collected on clinical disorders are fit for purpose and valid
range of data can be collected: data collected on clinical disorders can be qualitative or quantitiative, so can be analysed in various ways, furthermoe clinicians have contact with patients so further info can be gathered when necessary, t/f this can produce a detailed analysis of clinical disorders, increasing the validity
temporal validity: research will be conducted using the current DSM criteria to diagnose patients from the current population using methods releavnt at that point, t/f the data collected on mental health has external validity as it is releavnt to current mental health disorders
weaknesses of primary data used in clinical disorders
population validity: large populations on MH patients can be hard to find due to time and restrictions so primary research will often have small samples due to secondary data, t/f the patients will be unrepersentative and the findings on mental health cannot be generalised to the whole MH population reducing the validity
practical: researchers need to pla, accquire a sample and collect and analyse the data, this can be time consuming and expensive compared to secondary data, t/f it is not an economical method for researchers to use to study mental health compared to secondary dat5a
researcher effect: researcher has contact with the patients taking part and could influence the patients, features of the influencer could influencve ppants behaviour this could lead to demand characteristics, t/f behaviour displayed not be naturally occuring and cannot be generalised to everyday behaviour for that disorder reducing external validity
A01 secondary data in clinical psychology
secondary data is data collected second hand on mental health disorders
the researcher uses data from other people’s data and research
data can be quantitative (closed questionairres done by another researcher) or qualitative (hospital notes)
3 strengths of secondary data in clinical psychology
Large sample size- as the clinician is using data that has already been collected they can gather it from across multiple data sources meaning that they can have large sample sizes, t/f the patients will be more representative of the mental health population and the findings can be generalised, so the clinician can draw more meaningful conclusions on mental health
Practical- as the researcher does not have to plan and conduct research it is less time consuming and expensive for the clinician, t/f it is a cheaper and quicker way to study mental health compared to using primary data
Ethical- as the clinician is not interacting with the patient there is no way they can make there condition worse or impact the patient negatively and consent will have already been obtained, t/f it is a more ethical method compared to primary data as there is no contact with the patient
3 weaknesses of using secondary data in clinical psychology
May not be fit for purpose- as the research has not been conducted by the clinician, the data may not answer the specific clinical research question thus it is less relevant to the research question than primary data, t/f secondary data collected on clinical disorders is not always fit for purpose or valid
Lacks temporal validity- as the research done by the clinician was done in the past it may use an out of date version of the DSM or use methods that are no longer used, t/f the data collected on mental health lacks external validity as it may not be relevant to current mental health disorders and thus cannot be generalised to the current mental health population
Internal validity issues- as the data used was not done by the clinician the clinician cannot be sure that the researcher controlled for extraneous variables, t/f the clinician cannot be sure that the research on mental health has internal validity
aim of rosenhan
investigate if sane people could be distinguished from insane people using the DSM II, and if they can be differentiated how sanity can be identified
also to see if the DSM II is a valid diagnostic tool
rosenhan procedure
8 pseudo patients were sent to 12 different hospitals across the East and West coast of America
hospitals were a range of new, old, private and public
the pseudo patients gave the hospitals pseudonyms and false occupations when they phoned
they said they could hear unfamiliar voices (same sex) saying EMPTY, HOLLOW and THUD
apart from these details all other information was true
once admitted pseudo patients acted normally
did ward activities
covertly kept notes but later overtly
when asked how felt they said fine
asked “Pardon me when am i likely to be discharged”
pocketed/flushed medication
rosenhan findings
pseudo patients were identified as insane
all admitted and none detected as sane
all but 1 diagnosed as schizophrenic
7 released with diagnosis of sz in remission
stayed in hospital 7-52 days (average 19 days)
30% of patients realised pseudo patients were sane
visitors also thought pseudo patients acted normally
saw other patients medication in toilet
diagnosed with oral acquisition syndrome (because queue early for lunch) and pathalogical writing behaviour (because writing about experience)
experienced DEPERSONALISATION due to having no privacy
average therapist patient contact was 7 minutes a day
rosenhan conclusion
staff were unable to distingush those who were sane from those who were insane
behaviours were interpreted via expectations from diagnosis rather than objectively from their behaviour
the power of the label of insane leads to the subjective interpretation of behaviours displayed
4 strengths of rosenhan
Range of hospitals- used a range of 12 hospitals across the west coast of America including new old private and public, t/f findings that psychiatrists couldnt distinguish dane from insane is can be generalised to psychiatrists in America
Practical applications: from Rosenhans’s findings the DSM II was improved as a diagnostic tool, we can see this now with the DSM IV TR as it is a much more rigorous diagnostic tool for SZ, t/f rosenhan’s findings have benefited society by improving the reliabiloity of SZ diagnosis
Ecological validity- rosenhan’s study took place in a natural setting within the 12 american hospitals, t/f the environment was natural for the psychiatrists and thus there diagnosis of insane for the sane pseudopatients was naturally occuring and can be generalised to their everyday diagnosis
Mundane realism- diagnosing patients admitted to the hospital was an everyday familiar tasks for the clinicians and thus their diagnosis was naturally occuring, t/f the findings that clinicians couldnt distinguish the sane from the insane are representative of the clinicians everyday practice and thus the behaviour is generalisable
4 weaknesses of rosenhan
Standardised procedure- although all pseudo patients were trained before, they did not all follow the same procedure for example one pseudopatient struck up a romantic relationship with a nurse, t/f the procedure was not repeated the same for each of the 12 hospitals and thus rosenhan did not establish consitent findings throught and his findings that clinicians cannot distinguish the sane from insnane lack reliability
Temporal validity- the findings that clinicians couldnt distinguish the sane from the insane is only applicable to the DSM II, the DSM IV TR is more generalisable to current mental health, t/f the findings that clinicians cannot distinguish the sane from the insane are outdated and no longer valid findings for mantal health
Doctors play it safe- it is better for the doctors to misdiagnose a sane person and keep them in hospital rather than possibly release an insane patient as it could put their life in danger so the doctors could have diagnosed the pseudo patients with SZ as it was the closest diagnosis of the symptoms, t/f the clinicians may not have thought the pseudo patients were insane but may still have diagnosed them to keep them safe, decreasing the validity of rosenhans findings
Deception- the 8 pseudo patients gave the doctors fake names, occupations and symptoms of auditory hallucinations (empty, hollow, thud), thus the clinicians were unaware they were paticipating in research, t/f the clinicians from the 12 hospitals were deceived by the 8 pseudo patients and rosenhan breached the ethical BPS guideline of deception, so rosenhans study is unethical
false positive
say something happened but it didnt
false negative
say something didnt happen but it did
A01 clinical interviews
- clinical interviews are typically face to face whereby the clinician will ask a range of open and closed questions about the MH patients symptoms and the patient will respond describing their symptoms
- multiple clinicians could used an unstructured interview technique to gather rich detailed data about the patient and see if they give the same diagnoses eg if the patient says they hear voices the clinician could ask what gender are the voices
- the interview can be videod and transcribed by the clinician and thematically analysed to determine a full understanding of the disorder to make a correct diagnosis
- interviews gather in depth detailed qual data on the patients symptoms so they can be diagnosed and treated
2 strengths of clinical interviews
Gather in depth data- as the clinician generates the questions based on the previous answer (eg if the patient says the hear voices the clinician could ask what they say) so the clinician is able to understand the depth of the symptoms t/f the clinician can use their in depth detailed knowledge of the patient to make the most accurate diagnosis and increasing likelihood of succesful treatment thus increasing the validity of clinical interviews
Practical applications- by gaining an understanding of the patients symptoms this could help the clinician gain a deeper insight into the disorder and lead to future research t/f clinical interviews can lead to research into disorders which can help the patient and future patients thus lesding to more succesful diagnosis and treatment in society and increasing the validity of using clinical interviews
2 weaknesses of clinical interviews
Consistency- as clinical interviews are often semi structured two patients with the same symptoms could come in but based on the wording of there answers may receive different questions which could lead to different diagnoses and potentially misdiagnosis t/f the use of unstructured clinical interviews could lead to different diagnosis of the same questions and misdiagnosis thus reducing the validity of clinical interviews
Subjectivity- when the clinician analyses the transcripts of the clinical interviews they may interpret the qualitative data on the patient in a biased way (eg may be swayed towards disorders they have the greatest knowledge on), t/f the interpretation on the data gathered by the clincian about the patient may be subjetive leading to misdiagnosis, incorrect treatment and thus decreasing the validity of using clinical interviews
A01 grounded theory
it’s a method used for developing theories about mental health from research evidence.
qualitative research on mental health is the focal point.
research is conducted to gather info about a patient and the theory about mental health emerges from the gathered and analysed data (inductive method)
how its done:
1. identify the behavioural area they’re interest in and where they can gather information on this from
2. Caterogies are created from the collected data
3. they add comments to try and develop the clarity about what the data is showing them which helps identify links between different concepts emerging from the data
4. once a concept has developed researchers can review other literature and develop the theory in more detail
1 strength of grounded theory
Evidence is intergrated into the theory- as the theory is generated from the evidence being used this means the theory is relevant to making a diagnosis t/f the theory on mental health will have high validity
2 weaknesses of grounded theory
Subjective analysis- theory is based on the subjective opinion of the researcher the researcher picks aspects of the data to focus on and may force the data they are using to support the emerging theory t/f the researcher is selecting information and may miss information thus reducing validity of the theory on mental health
Reliability- theory is based on the subjective interpretation of the researcher and the researcher will choose to only focus in on the information that supports their emerging theory t/f when another researcher conducts the same research or codes the data different theoretical concepts may emerge so the findings will not be consistent
A01 thematic analysis
- analyses a primary source generating qualitative data
- bottom up approach typically uses a two tailed hypothesis
- summarises large amounts of data into themes enabling conclusions to be made
- creates themes with supporting quotes
6 phases
1. familarise with data
2. generate initial codes
3. search for themes
4. reveiw themes
5. define and name themes
6. produce report